First Post

Good night. I'm heading to bed.

giphy.gif
 
I just tell the truth, Ross.

That is precious.

1787046190887.png

It sucks for you, because you can't come up with any on-topic replies to refute anything that I've said, but that's where we're at.

Quick recap of facts that you replied to with insults instead of adult rebuttals:
  1. Fauci lied about the origin of covid to cover his ass
  2. you can't quantify how Trump "make da cuntwy wuwse"
  3. you can't deny that Trump has completely fixed the border chaos
  4. you can't deny that the Dems have explicitly called for political violence, they constantly demonize their opponents, and they always fail to condemn extreme political violence
  5. you can't deny that Biden was clearly a vegetable and that trump is quite clearly a very mentally capable adult
  6. you can't deny that I turned all of your stupid insults around by citing blatant facts

You say that I can't.

BUT I DO.

Maybe you meant something else.

My posts aren't angry at all, there's just no reason for me to find a polite way to say that you're just an angry, stupid loser.

You sure about that?

If you wanna shed the title of angry stupid loser then find some adult rebuttals instead of baseless insults.

That's all it takes?

Are you sure about that also?
 
Silly projection on your part. She isn't a "leftist," just an "old school" Dem. None of those things you claim are what she supports.
She's a rare bird. She must feel kind of left behind now.

I really liked Clinton when he was president, but modern Democrats don't resemble him in any way.
 
That was just another example of you being completely unable to address any of the actual topics, Ross. You sound like a grade 3 student.
Sorry, Sonny. Don't mean to embarrass you any more than you are begging to be embarrassed.

Thanks for giving me this opportunity. You are fun to toy with.
 
Sorry, Sonny. Don't mean to embarrass you any more than you are begging to be embarrassed. Thanks for giving me this opportunity. You are fun to toy with.


 
Do I really need to, or can I just guess how stupid it was with a 100% chance of being correct?

Your choice. If I were you, I'd opt for the latter.

In case you need a laugh, though:

 
  • Like
Reactions: WCM
Sorry, Sonny. Don't mean to embarrass you any more than you are begging to be embarrassed.

Thanks for giving me this opportunity. You are fun to toy with.
I know that this will come as a complete surprise to you, but FYI spewing a string of baseless accusations & sandbox insults while dodging the challenges presented to you in a post doesn't constitute "embarrassing someone else", lol.

All of the points I presented still stand as uncontested, which counts as verified, Ross.

The pattern that's clearly forming here is: I write factual, on-point, intelligent posts and rebuttals, and all that you can do is fire back with childish insults while avoiding on-topic discussion entirely. Have a nice day, I suggest you don't skip out on your meds.
 
Your choice. If I were you, I'd opt for the latter.

In case you need a laugh, though:

I would never have recognized that post as his, due to the general lack of snottiness in it. Only the "Mrs Lotsabucks" tag - which he is no doubt extremely proud of - showed his actual low character.

In general there was nothing really more substantial in it than "I won a bartending contest and I met Frank Sinatra", so I don't know what made that "newspaper worthy". It was also rambling and it jumped from topic to topic with seemingly no rhyme nor reason.

I actually feel kinda bad for a guy whose lifetime achievement was refilling the glass of a 1960s crooner with booze.

FFS... Martin, Sinatra, Lawford, and S Davis Jr et al probably averaged 40 drinks a day for ten years... that's 150,000 drinks. "But Ross served one of them" :laugh:
 
I would never have recognized that post as his, due to the general lack of snottiness in it. Only the "Mrs Lotsabucks" tag - which he is no doubt extremely proud of - showed his actual low character. In general there was nothing really more substantial in it than "I won a bartending contest and I met Frank Sinatra", so I don't know what made that "newspaper worthy". It was also rambling and it jumped from topic to topic with seemingly no rhyme nor reason. I actually feel kinda bad for a guy whose lifetime achievement was refilling the glass of a 1960s crooner with booze. FFS... Martin, Sinatra, Lawford, and S Davis Jr et al probably averaged 40 drinks a day for ten years... that's 150,000 drinks. "But Ross served one of them"

I feel confident that the "newspaper" in question was not the NYT.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: WCM
Back
Top