California Revokes First Amendment.

Uncensored2008

Uncensored2008

Well-known member
Contributor
Gavin Newsom today signed Assembly Bill 2624, which outlaws journalists exposing fraud or printing stories critical of democrats and organizations protected by democrats. Ending the long tradition of freedom of the press in America.

Without respect for the United States Constitution, Newsom and the politburo in California outlawed a free and independent press as a prelude to ending freedom of speech and freedom of religion.

https://twitter.com/x/status/2091389975073816640
View: https://x.com/SenStricklandCA/status/2091389975073816640?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E2091389975073816640%7Ctwgr%5E7c7399353f550c0c83b60cccacde54d5a6c14eb1%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftownhall.com%2Fnews%2Fjosephchalfant%2F2026%2F08%2F23%2Fgavin-newsom-signs-the-stop-nick-shirley-act-into-law-n2681740
 
Uncensored2008 said:
Gavin Newsom today signed Assembly Bill 2624, which outlaws journalists exposing fraud or printing stories critical of democrats and organizations protected by democrats. Ending the long tradition of freedom of the press in America.

Without respect for the United States Constitution, Newsom and the politburo in California outlawed a free and independent press as a prelude to ending freedom of speech and freedom of religion.

https://twitter.com/x/status/2091389975073816640
View: https://x.com/SenStricklandCA/status/2091389975073816640?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E2091389975073816640%7Ctwgr%5E7c7399353f550c0c83b60cccacde54d5a6c14eb1%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftownhall.com%2Fnews%2Fjosephchalfant%2F2026%2F08%2F23%2Fgavin-newsom-signs-the-stop-nick-shirley-act-into-law-n2681740
Click to expand...
wow.

fucking pathetic.

trump Zionists arent much better on free speech these days, however.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
Gavin Newsom today signed Assembly Bill 2624, which outlaws journalists exposing fraud or printing stories critical of democrats and organizations protected by democrats. Ending the long tradition of freedom of the press in America.

Without respect for the United States Constitution, Newsom and the politburo in California outlawed a free and independent press as a prelude to ending freedom of speech and freedom of religion.

https://twitter.com/x/status/2091389975073816640
View: https://x.com/SenStricklandCA/status/2091389975073816640?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E2091389975073816640%7Ctwgr%5E7c7399353f550c0c83b60cccacde54d5a6c14eb1%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftownhall.com%2Fnews%2Fjosephchalfant%2F2026%2F08%2F23%2Fgavin-newsom-signs-the-stop-nick-shirley-act-into-law-n2681740
Click to expand...
You think doxxing should be allowed? Well talk to Damocles.
 
@Jarod and @Walt - do you agree with your fellow Communist Lefty that the 1st Amendment is a hindrance to party goals and must be gotten rid of?

Do you think federal courts will uphold California's action in ending constitutional rights?
 
AProudLefty said:
Obviously you don't know what the bill is about.
Click to expand...

Obviously you oppose civil rights.

This LAW ends freedom of the press.

Fair warning, this is from the United States Constitution, you may break out in hives or have convulsions if you read it:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

It doesn't say "unless the press exposes fraud by people tied to the ruling party."
 
Uncensored2008 said:
Obviously you oppose civil rights.

This LAW ends freedom of the press.

Fair warning, this is from the United States Constitution, you may break out in hives or have convulsions if you read it:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

It doesn't say "unless the press exposes fraud by people tied to the ruling party."
Click to expand...
Again, you have no clue what the bill is about.

It's about doxxing.
 
AProudLefty said:
Do you think Damocles should allow doxxing?
Click to expand...

I think red herring fallacies are a fallacy for a reason.

You can't defend the frontal assault on fundamental constitutional rights, so you start in with gibberish.

What do you think the ruling Junta in California will do when the federal courts strike this down - tomorrow or the next day? Will they ignore the courts as they have ignored the Constitution? Will they attempt to secede, perhaps attempt to join Communist China?
 
AProudLefty said:
Again, you have no clue what the bill is about.
Click to expand...

Again, your mindless claptrap has no value.

You seek to end freedom of the press, because massive fraud has been exposed by your party.

AProudLefty said:
It's about doxxing.
Click to expand...

ROFL

So this was "doxxing" Comrade?

apnews.com

Report: Solyndra misrepresented facts to get loan guarantee

WASHINGTON (AP) — A four-year investigation has concluded that officials of the solar company Solyndra misrepresented facts and omitted key information in their efforts to get a $535 million loan guarantee from the federal government.
apnews.com apnews.com

What fucking idiocy.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
I think red herring fallacies are a fallacy for a reason.

You can't defend the frontal assault on fundamental constitutional rights, so you start in with gibberish.

What do you think the ruling Junta in California will do when the federal courts strike this down - tomorrow or the next day? Will they ignore the courts as they have ignored the Constitution? Will they attempt to secede, perhaps attempt to join Communist China?
Click to expand...
Grok, is stop Nick Shirley Act a violation of the First Amendment?

No, California’s AB 2624 (nicknamed the “Stop Nick Shirley Act” by critics) is not a clear or facial violation of the First Amendment
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top