The Supreme Court has cleared the way for President Trump's executive order restricting mail-in voting ahead of midterms

ziggy

ziggy

Verified User
The Supreme Court on Monday cleared the way for President Donald Trump to move ahead with his executive order restricting mail-in voting, though it remains unclear how much his administration can implement before the fast-approaching midterm elections.

The decision appears to leave room for additional court challenges that could further slow Trump’s order. The U.S. Postal Service laid out how it would implement the order last week, but time is running short to impose major changes with some states beginning to send mail ballots to voters in just a few weeks.

The Supreme Court’s three liberal-leaning justices dissented from the unsigned order.

Mail balloting has long been a favorite target for Trump, who has claimed that it breeds fraud despite strong evidence to the contrary and his own use of the voting method.

The case could be one of multiple voting-related challenges before the justices. The Justice Department had filed an emergency appeal asking the high court to allow work on implementing the changes before the midterms.

Trump’s executive order, signed in March, calls on his administration to create lists of eligible voters and orders the U.S. Postal Service to deliver mail ballots only to people on those lists.

apnews.com

Supreme Court clears the way for Trump mail voting order in advance of midterms

The Supreme Court has cleared the way for President Donald Trump to move ahead on his executive order restricting mail-in voting, though it remains unclear how much his administration can implement before the fast-approaching midterm elections.
apnews.com apnews.com
 
ziggy said:
The Supreme Court on Monday cleared the way for President Donald Trump to move ahead with his executive order restricting mail-in voting, though it remains unclear how much his administration can implement before the fast-approaching midterm elections.

The decision appears to leave room for additional court challenges that could further slow Trump’s order. The U.S. Postal Service laid out how it would implement the order last week, but time is running short to impose major changes with some states beginning to send mail ballots to voters in just a few weeks.

The Supreme Court’s three liberal-leaning justices dissented from the unsigned order.

Mail balloting has long been a favorite target for Trump, who has claimed that it breeds fraud despite strong evidence to the contrary and his own use of the voting method.

The case could be one of multiple voting-related challenges before the justices. The Justice Department had filed an emergency appeal asking the high court to allow work on implementing the changes before the midterms.

Trump’s executive order, signed in March, calls on his administration to create lists of eligible voters and orders the U.S. Postal Service to deliver mail ballots only to people on those lists.

apnews.com

Supreme Court clears the way for Trump mail voting order in advance of midterms

The Supreme Court has cleared the way for President Donald Trump to move ahead on his executive order restricting mail-in voting, though it remains unclear how much his administration can implement before the fast-approaching midterm elections.
apnews.com apnews.com
Click to expand...
The best part above is “who has claimed ,” meaning based on a lie, and he himself votes by mail

Probability is that given the time element and logistics involved it has no effect on the midterms

Ironic how all these MAGA’s who say they love the Constitution and supposedly hate a strong Central Government and Federal interference are all giddy with Trump is using his power and influence in anyway he can to control elections
 
If the stay is lifted timely, is it "too late for this election" (midterms)?


No — not if the stay is lifted promptly.


USPS itself addresses this directly in the final rule published August 21/22, 2026. The agency states that it issued the rule with an immediate effective date (and published it despite the injunctions) specifically so that:


“If the government obtains timely relief from the injunctions, implementation immediately thereafter will provide election officials as much time as possible before the next election to comply with the rule’s preparation standards for Federal Ballot Mail envelopes, and to prepare to submit data to the Federal Ballot Mail Portal… before the mail-in and absentee ballots subject to this rule are mailed (which generally occurs in September or thereafter, as determined by state law).”
Click to expand...


  • Election Day: November 3, 2026.
  • Typical start of domestic mail-ballot mailing:
    • Some states begin more than 45 days out (before mid-September).
    • Many begin at the 45-day mark (~September 19) or in the 30–45 day window.
    • Others start later in September or into October.
    • All-mail states (CA, CO, HI, NV, OR, UT, WA, etc.) and high-volume states have earlier/larger mailings.

That leaves roughly 3–6+ weeks of runway from now until the bulk of outbound ballot mailings begin in most places, depending on the state.
 
archives said:
The best part above is “who has claimed ,” meaning based on a lie, and he himself votes by mail

Probability is that given the time element and logistics involved it has no effect on the midterms

Ironic how all these MAGA’s who say they love the Constitution and supposedly hate a strong Central Government and Federal interference are all giddy with Trump is using his power and influence in anyway he can to control elections
Click to expand...
Poor anchovies, nobody said mail in ballots would be eliminated, just not drop shipped.
 
Well see.....I spect the states will soon be in front of judges with "Your honor.....this is insane....surely you can see this".
 
The rule requires unique serialized Intelligent Mail barcodes on both outbound and return envelopes, specific Official Election Mail markings, automation compatibility, and USPS mailpiece design review. Ballot envelopes also carry state-mandated instructions, security features, and often prepaid return postage options.

Commercial bulk-mail operations (catalogs, fundraising, political direct mail, etc.) routinely turn around new envelope designs, barcodes, testing, and high-volume printing on compressed schedules because that is their core business. They maintain standing relationships with printers, keep flexible stock, absorb cost overruns, and treat redesigns as routine. There is no structural reason a well-resourced state election office or its contracted vendors could not do something similar for ballot envelopes.

The rule builds in flexibility for ongoing list updates, and portal user registration is required only a couple of business days before a given outbound mailing. USPS’s position is that a timely lift still allows implementation for the 2026 cycle.

The primary lever for compulsory enforcement is operational.

As of August 24, 2026, the Supreme Court has lifted one of the key injunctions (the one covering the coalition of mostly Blue states from the California et al. case). This allows the administration to move forward on implementing parts of Executive Order 14399 and the related USPS final rule in those states. A separate nationwide injunction tied to the USPS rule remains a complicating factor and is expected to face further litigation.

What USPS can do under the rule​


The rule’s core enforcement mechanism is straightforward and has been stated repeatedly by the Postmaster General and in the final rule text:

  • States that do not submit the required Mail-In and Absentee Participation Lists (with matching unique barcodes) or that fail to use compliant envelopes (Official Election Mail markings + unique serialized Intelligent Mail barcodes on both outbound and return envelopes) will have their outbound federal ballot mailings rejected.
  • USPS will not accept or transmit those non-compliant mailings. Ballots simply will not be delivered through the postal system for that state (or for voters not on the submitted list).

This is the functional equivalent of a hard stop on mail-ballot delivery for non-compliant jurisdictions. It does not require court action to apply once the rule is fully operative.

What the Executive Order and DOJ can do​


Section 5 of EO 14399 directs the Attorney General and relevant agencies to:


  • Take all lawful steps to deter and address noncompliance with federal law, including withholding federal funds from noncompliant states or localities where such withholding is authorized by existing law.
  • Refer evidence of violations by state or local election officials, contractors, or entities involved in printing, producing, shipping, or distributing ballots to the Department of Justice for investigation or charges under statutes including:
    • 18 U.S.C. §§ 2(a), 241, 371 (aiding/abetting, conspiracy against rights, conspiracy)
    • 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001, 1015 (false statements)
    • 52 U.S.C. §§ 10307, 20511 (election-related prohibitions under the Voting Rights Act and National Voter Registration Act)

The EO frames prioritization of investigations and prosecutions of officials who issue ballots to individuals deemed ineligible. These would still require establishing the elements of existing criminal statutes; the EO itself does not create new crimes.


Court options​


Once any remaining stays are fully lifted and the rule is enforceable:


  • Courts could issue further injunctions or orders compelling compliance if states actively defy a final, operative rule.

​

Practical bottom line​


The most immediate and concrete consequence for a Blue state that simply refuses to submit lists or redesign envelopes is that USPS will not deliver its mail ballots. That is the rule’s designed enforcement tool.
 
ziggy said:
The Supreme Court on Monday cleared the way for President Donald Trump to move ahead with his executive order restricting mail-in voting, though it remains unclear how much his administration can implement before the fast-approaching midterm elections.

The decision appears to leave room for additional court challenges that could further slow Trump’s order. The U.S. Postal Service laid out how it would implement the order last week, but time is running short to impose major changes with some states beginning to send mail ballots to voters in just a few weeks.

The Supreme Court’s three liberal-leaning justices dissented from the unsigned order.

Mail balloting has long been a favorite target for Trump, who has claimed that it breeds fraud despite strong evidence to the contrary and his own use of the voting method.
Click to expand...
Stop making shit up.
Mass mail-in voting is ripe for fraud.
I am glad Trump is using the USPS to put roadblocks in the way of it.
You are lying because you don't want elections at all.
ziggy said:
The case could be one of multiple voting-related challenges before the justices. The Justice Department had filed an emergency appeal asking the high court to allow work on implementing the changes before the midterms.
Click to expand...
USPS has already done most of the work.
ziggy said:
Trump’s executive order, signed in March, calls on his administration to create lists of eligible voters and orders the U.S. Postal Service to deliver mail ballots only to people on those lists.
Click to expand...
If the States refuse the information, USPS will not mail or carry their ballots. It's really pretty simple.
 
archives said:
The best part above is “who has claimed ,” meaning based on a lie, and he himself votes by mail

Probability is that given the time element and logistics involved it has no effect on the midterms

Ironic how all these MAGA’s who say they love the Constitution and supposedly hate a strong Central Government and Federal interference are all giddy with Trump is using his power and influence in anyway he can to control elections
Click to expand...
MAGA isn't a person, anchovies. It is DEMOCRATS that want to discard the Constitution and all State constitutions.
DON'T TRY TO HIDE BEHIND THE DOCUMENT YOU DESPISE!
 
Misleading title. The court didn't "clear the way" for Trump's order. It cleared the way for certain preliminary steps that by themselves the court found unaffected by The Constitution.
 
ziggy said:
The Supreme Court on Monday cleared the way for President Donald Trump to move ahead with his executive order restricting mail-in voting, though it remains unclear how much his administration can implement before the fast-approaching midterm elections.

The decision appears to leave room for additional court challenges that could further slow Trump’s order. The U.S. Postal Service laid out how it would implement the order last week, but time is running short to impose major changes with some states beginning to send mail ballots to voters in just a few weeks.

The Supreme Court’s three liberal-leaning justices dissented from the unsigned order.

Mail balloting has long been a favorite target for Trump, who has claimed that it breeds fraud despite strong evidence to the contrary and his own use of the voting method.

The case could be one of multiple voting-related challenges before the justices. The Justice Department had filed an emergency appeal asking the high court to allow work on implementing the changes before the midterms.

Trump’s executive order, signed in March, calls on his administration to create lists of eligible voters and orders the U.S. Postal Service to deliver mail ballots only to people on those lists.

apnews.com

Supreme Court clears the way for Trump mail voting order in advance of midterms

The Supreme Court has cleared the way for President Donald Trump to move ahead on his executive order restricting mail-in voting, though it remains unclear how much his administration can implement before the fast-approaching midterm elections.
apnews.com apnews.com
Click to expand...
Is there anyway the system can be implemented between now and election day?

So my question is, if the system cannot be implemented between now and election day, do they vote by mail the old way, or does it specifically end voting my mail for this election?

Another question I have is if the system is such a mess ballots don’t get through before election day, do those votes not count?
 
archives said:
The best part above is “who has claimed ,” meaning based on a lie, and he himself votes by mail

Probability is that given the time element and logistics involved it has no effect on the midterms

Ironic how all these MAGA’s who say they love the Constitution and supposedly hate a strong Central Government and Federal interference are all giddy with Trump is using his power and influence in anyway he can to control elections
Click to expand...
and you who loves a strong central gobblement now all of a sudden are all states rights.

funny how that works isn't it?
 
The post office should not act for one side in the election. Trump is politicizing the post office, and this slanted right-wing court is helping him. Trump breaks all the rules routinely. To Trump. " If you ain't cheating, you ain't trying".
 
Teflon Don said:
and you who loves a strong central gobblement now all of a sudden are all states rights.

funny how that works isn't it?
Click to expand...
Love, no, acknowledging the purpose of a strong Central Government, yes, but one that recognizes and follows the Constitution, which this one does not, especially when it comes to personally profiteering by abusing it
 
Jarod said:
Is there anyway the system can be implemented between now and election day?

So my question is, if the system cannot be implemented between now and election day, do they vote by mail the old way, or does it specifically end voting my mail for this election?

Another question I have is if the system is such a mess ballots don’t get through before election day, do those votes not count?
Click to expand...
It is already being implemented, Pretender.
If a State does not comply with USPS and federal requirements for a federal election, such ballots cannot go out through the mail, and they won't be processed through the mail.

They won't count, since you won't receive them.

States can provide ballots and process them by another means, though. You know, an actual polling place.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top