Judge strikes down Texas ban on drag shows, tells people offended by them ‘just don’t go’

That is exactly what they are. Drag queens are nothing but sexualized clowns.


But lefties love them...

They also love this:


Dancing-Queen-e1550790761676-1000x600.jpg


THESE ARE ALL MALES, BTW



Any guesses?
 
I think that there should be no federal limit on who can enter bars.

I wasn't aware that there was a federal limit on who can enter bars.

Alcohol licensing, age-of-entry rules, and most door policies are state and local matters (plus the bar’s own house rules). The 21st Amendment left primary authority over alcohol to the states.

The closest federal law is the National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984 (23 U.S.C. § 158). It does not ban people under 21 from entering bars. It withholds a portion of federal highway funds from any state that allows people under 21 to purchase or publicly possess alcohol. Every state complied, so the purchase age is uniformly 21. The law says nothing about physical presence.

I also think 21 is way to old.

LOL; Brad the Great Emancipator.

The government should not control who can enter bars or see movies.

Tilting at windmills, are we?

Movie ratings (G, PG, PG-13, R, NC-17) are a voluntary industry system created in 1968 by the Motion Picture Association. They have no force of federal law. Theaters enforce them as private business policy, not because a statute requires it. A few states have enacted or considered statutes that piggyback on the industry ratings for theater admission. That is the exception.
 
As an adult, you can go watch men pretend to be women to your hearts delight. You just can't bring the kiddies along. And why would you WANT to bring the kiddies along?

But HE CAN bring the kiddies along. In fact, he could watch kiddies in drag, should that be his wish . He could even stuff dollar bills into their clothing, if he wanted to.

The federal government does not set age limits on who may attend or perform in drag shows. Drag is treated as expressive conduct protected by the First Amendment unless it meets obscenity standards (Miller v. California) or the narrower “harmful to minors” / variable-obscenity standard that states may apply to children. There is no federal statute that says “no one under 18 may watch drag” or “you must be 18 to perform it.”


What exists is a patchwork of state laws, mostly from 2023, plus ordinary child-labor and entertainment rules.

Audience (minors attending)​


A handful of states passed laws restricting minors from certain live performances. Most do not ban “drag” by name. They ban “adult live performances,” “sexually oriented performances,” or “adult cabaret” that include specified sexual or lewd conduct (nudity, simulated sex, lewd exposure of prosthetic/imitation breasts or genitals, etc.) and that fail a three-part test modeled on Miller but adjusted for the age of the child present.


Current status as of late August 2026:

  • Florida — Enforceable. The full 11th Circuit (8–5) vacated the injunction on the 2023 Protection of Children Act. Knowingly admitting a child to a qualifying “adult live performance” is a misdemeanor. Parental consent is not described as an exception. Further district-court proceedings continue.
  • Texas — Blocked again. A federal judge struck down SB 12 a second time (Aug. 25–26, 2026) as overbroad and vague. The law had briefly been live after a Fifth Circuit remand.
  • Tennessee, Montana, Arkansas, North Dakota — Have statutes aimed at adult/cabaret performances on public property or in the presence of minors; some mention impersonators or drag story hour. Enforceability has been mixed after lawsuits (standing, overbreadth, injunctions).
  • Many other states introduced bills; most failed, were narrowed to obscenity language, or were blocked.

These laws do not automatically cover every lip-sync or family-style drag show. They target performances that meet the statutory sexual/lewd + prurient + no serious value-for-that-age test. Vagueness about where that line sits is why most of the cases were filed.

Performers​


There is no special government age floor just for drag. A minor who is paid to perform is subject to the same child-entertainment and child-labor rules that apply to theater, film, and similar work (work permits, hour limits, sometimes a studio teacher or parent present). Those rules are mostly state law; federal FLSA has entertainment exemptions. A 13-year-old performing at an all-ages event is not automatically illegal, but the venue and producers still have to follow labor, obscenity, and (in some states) the new “adult performance” statutes if the content qualifies.
 
Are laws against the sale and use of narcotics "abusive to people?" Since they infringe on people doing whatever they please?

What about laws that restrict anyone under 21 to be in a bar?

I have no issue with drag shows that are restricted to audiences of people 18 or over. I doubt anyone else here does either.

Remember - despite the blatant lies of Guano and NBC, all the law did was restrict drag shows to 18 and older - just as bars are restricted to 21 and older.

And this is why the judge will lose on appeal.

The difference between your examples and the topic is obvious. Narcotics cause great harm to the person and to our society.

As for the bars, that is usually the choice of the owner of the establishment. Plenty of bars do not restrict access by age.
 
U.S. District Judge David Hittner, a Reagan appointee, said the measure, known as Texas Senate Bill 12, improperly restricted speech, violating the First Amendment of the Constitution.
The 1st amendment does not apply to the State of Texas. No judge has any authority to change the Constitution. Any such attempt by any judge can be ignored.
 
But lefties love them...

They also love this:


Dancing-Queen-e1550790761676-1000x600.jpg


THESE ARE ALL MALES, BTW



Any guesses?
No, we do not. Those kid beauty contests are mostly Southern-states crap.
 
Back
Top