Reason #2,374 of why you cannot trust cops and government

CASTLE ROCK, Colo. — More than two years after a police K-9 attacked their 2-year-old daughter during her birthday party, Nick and Bethany Dean are speaking publicly about the lasting toll the incident has taken on their family, including a legal case that ended in acquittal for the dog's handler and medical debt the family says has reached nearly $300,000.

The attack happened Aug. 11, 2024, during a party for the couple's twins, who were turning 2. According to Nick Dean, he was standing on the deck of the family's home talking with friends when he noticed a dog climbing the fence from a neighboring yard.

"I noticed the dog had started to climb the fence," Dean said. "In an instant, the dog climbed our fence and immediately went for my daughter."

The dog, a Belgian Malinois named Ragnar, was an active-duty Jefferson County Sheriff's Office K-9 belonging to a deputy who lived next door.

Dean said he ran to intervene. "I sprinted down the stairs and landed on the dog, put my hands in its jaws, and just pried with every muscle in my body," he said.

Bethany Dean was inside the home at the time. "I was actually upstairs inside, so I didn't witness it, and I'm really thankful for that, but I heard screaming, and I looked out the window, and I remember feeling dread that something bad happened out there," she said. "My friend came running inside and said the dog bit Lily."

Lily suffered a broken femur in the attack. Nick Dean suffered injuries to his chest, back, and hip while trying to pull the dog off his daughter.


The deputy who owned the dog faced two misdemeanor charges of unlawful ownership of a dangerous dog causing injury. A Douglas County jury found the deputy not guilty after his defense argued he was immune from prosecution under state law because he was considered to be performing his duties as a K-9 handler, even while at home.

"We trusted the process; we believed that a child could have lost their life, so surely someone was gonna step up to the plate to help," Nick Dean said.

Following the acquittal, the Deans said their outlook shifted. "That quickly turned to fear because we are on the hook for almost $300,000 in medical bills and still battling to find healing for my body that we haven't found a solution to yet," he said.

 
If I'm right, and I believe that I am, you may live long enough to witness the end of policing in its current iteration.

I believe the left will abolish the police as soon as they can, and the only "crime" in their brave new world will be expressing opinions they don't like.

The irony is that they haven't thought this through.
 
CASTLE ROCK, Colo. — More than two years after a police K-9 attacked their 2-year-old daughter during her birthday party, Nick and Bethany Dean are speaking publicly about the lasting toll the incident has taken on their family, including a legal case that ended in acquittal for the dog's handler and medical debt the family says has reached nearly $300,000.

The attack happened Aug. 11, 2024, during a party for the couple's twins, who were turning 2. According to Nick Dean, he was standing on the deck of the family's home talking with friends when he noticed a dog climbing the fence from a neighboring yard.

"I noticed the dog had started to climb the fence," Dean said. "In an instant, the dog climbed our fence and immediately went for my daughter."

The dog, a Belgian Malinois named Ragnar, was an active-duty Jefferson County Sheriff's Office K-9 belonging to a deputy who lived next door.

Dean said he ran to intervene. "I sprinted down the stairs and landed on the dog, put my hands in its jaws, and just pried with every muscle in my body," he said.

Bethany Dean was inside the home at the time. "I was actually upstairs inside, so I didn't witness it, and I'm really thankful for that, but I heard screaming, and I looked out the window, and I remember feeling dread that something bad happened out there," she said. "My friend came running inside and said the dog bit Lily."

Lily suffered a broken femur in the attack. Nick Dean suffered injuries to his chest, back, and hip while trying to pull the dog off his daughter.


The deputy who owned the dog faced two misdemeanor charges of unlawful ownership of a dangerous dog causing injury. A Douglas County jury found the deputy not guilty after his defense argued he was immune from prosecution under state law because he was considered to be performing his duties as a K-9 handler, even while at home.

"We trusted the process; we believed that a child could have lost their life, so surely someone was gonna step up to the plate to help," Nick Dean said.

Following the acquittal, the Deans said their outlook shifted. "That quickly turned to fear because we are on the hook for almost $300,000 in medical bills and still battling to find healing for my body that we haven't found a solution to yet," he said.

Thats an asinine decision
 
CASTLE ROCK, Colo. — More than two years after a police K-9 attacked their 2-year-old daughter during her birthday party, Nick and Bethany Dean are speaking publicly about the lasting toll the incident has taken on their family, including a legal case that ended in acquittal for the dog's handler and medical debt the family says has reached nearly $300,000.

The attack happened Aug. 11, 2024, during a party for the couple's twins, who were turning 2. According to Nick Dean, he was standing on the deck of the family's home talking with friends when he noticed a dog climbing the fence from a neighboring yard.

"I noticed the dog had started to climb the fence," Dean said. "In an instant, the dog climbed our fence and immediately went for my daughter."

The dog, a Belgian Malinois named Ragnar, was an active-duty Jefferson County Sheriff's Office K-9 belonging to a deputy who lived next door.

Dean said he ran to intervene. "I sprinted down the stairs and landed on the dog, put my hands in its jaws, and just pried with every muscle in my body," he said.

Bethany Dean was inside the home at the time. "I was actually upstairs inside, so I didn't witness it, and I'm really thankful for that, but I heard screaming, and I looked out the window, and I remember feeling dread that something bad happened out there," she said. "My friend came running inside and said the dog bit Lily."

Lily suffered a broken femur in the attack. Nick Dean suffered injuries to his chest, back, and hip while trying to pull the dog off his daughter.


The deputy who owned the dog faced two misdemeanor charges of unlawful ownership of a dangerous dog causing injury. A Douglas County jury found the deputy not guilty after his defense argued he was immune from prosecution under state law because he was considered to be performing his duties as a K-9 handler, even while at home.

"We trusted the process; we believed that a child could have lost their life, so surely someone was gonna step up to the plate to help," Nick Dean said.

Following the acquittal, the Deans said their outlook shifted. "That quickly turned to fear because we are on the hook for almost $300,000 in medical bills and still battling to find healing for my body that we haven't found a solution to yet," he said.


I hope they file a civil lawsuit against that shit of a neighbor.
 
they tried. The cop neighbor got qualified immunity under the claim that even off duty, he was still operating as a K9 officer

What bullshit. There's a legal term for that sort of immunity but it slips my mind at the moment. @Jarod would know. I think it's sovereign immunity or something like that. When a drug-addicted ER doctor killed my late husband, my atty. sued both him and the hospital that hired him KNOWING he had just gotten off license suspension for drug diversion and usage. The hospital had their part dismissed because it was a community hospital supported in part by taxes, thus immune for malpractice. I wonder if this case with the dog is similar. Do you know if that family has a Gofundme?
 
What bullshit. There's a legal term for that sort of immunity but it slips my mind at the moment. @Jarod would know. I think it's sovereign immunity or something like that. When a drug-addicted ER doctor killed my late husband, my atty. sued both him and the hospital that hired him KNOWING he had just gotten off license suspension for drug diversion and usage. The hospital had their part dismissed because it was a community hospital supported in part by taxes, thus immune for malpractice. I wonder if this case with the dog is similar. Do you know if that family has a Gofundme?
 

“They tried. The cop neighbor got qualified immunity…”​


This is the main claim that needs correction.


  • The family did consult civil counsel (Dagny/Dagna Van Der Jagt was publicly identified as preparing a civil case after the criminal acquittal). They considered suing.
  • By the August 2026 follow-up stories, no lawyer would take the case on contingency, and the family said they would not take on more debt to pursue it. There is no public record of a filed civil lawsuit that a court then dismissed on qualified immunity.
  • What actually blocked criminal charges was statutory immunity in the dangerous-dog law, not the federal qualified-immunity doctrine that applies to §1983 civil-rights suits. Colorado also limited qualified immunity for certain state-court claims against officers in 2020; this case is a dog-bite / governmental-immunity / statute-exception problem, not a classic QI ruling.
  • The “always on duty as a K-9 handler even at home” argument is the same theory the defense used in the criminal trial. The county and insurance then treated the incident as involving an on-duty department dog when declining to pay.

So: they explored civil remedies; lawyers and the county treated liability as blocked or too risky to take; the successful immunity argument was the state dangerous-dog exception plus governmental-immunity posture—not a reported court order granting “qualified immunity” after a filed lawsuit.
 
One of the great things about the internet is that you have a plethora of podcasters, independents news sites and general posters who are recording and posting the (sadly) almost daily occurrences of police and court abuses. Like the line from "The X Files" goes, the truth is out there!
 
CASTLE ROCK, Colo. — More than two years after a police K-9 attacked their 2-year-old daughter during her birthday party, Nick and Bethany Dean are speaking publicly about the lasting toll the incident has taken on their family, including a legal case that ended in acquittal for the dog's handler and medical debt the family says has reached nearly $300,000.

The attack happened Aug. 11, 2024, during a party for the couple's twins, who were turning 2. According to Nick Dean, he was standing on the deck of the family's home talking with friends when he noticed a dog climbing the fence from a neighboring yard.

"I noticed the dog had started to climb the fence," Dean said. "In an instant, the dog climbed our fence and immediately went for my daughter."

The dog, a Belgian Malinois named Ragnar, was an active-duty Jefferson County Sheriff's Office K-9 belonging to a deputy who lived next door.

Dean said he ran to intervene. "I sprinted down the stairs and landed on the dog, put my hands in its jaws, and just pried with every muscle in my body," he said.

Bethany Dean was inside the home at the time. "I was actually upstairs inside, so I didn't witness it, and I'm really thankful for that, but I heard screaming, and I looked out the window, and I remember feeling dread that something bad happened out there," she said. "My friend came running inside and said the dog bit Lily."

Lily suffered a broken femur in the attack. Nick Dean suffered injuries to his chest, back, and hip while trying to pull the dog off his daughter.


The deputy who owned the dog faced two misdemeanor charges of unlawful ownership of a dangerous dog causing injury. A Douglas County jury found the deputy not guilty after his defense argued he was immune from prosecution under state law because he was considered to be performing his duties as a K-9 handler, even while at home.

"We trusted the process; we believed that a child could have lost their life, so surely someone was gonna step up to the plate to help," Nick Dean said.

Following the acquittal, the Deans said their outlook shifted. "That quickly turned to fear because we are on the hook for almost $300,000 in medical bills and still battling to find healing for my body that we haven't found a solution to yet," he said.

The plaintiff's lawyer is an idiot.

There clearly is one of two cases present with regard to the deputy here:

A. He wasn't present and supervising the animal, in which case he wasn't doing his duty as a K-9 handler. As the dog was unsupervised and got out of the yard or other enclosure, the handler failed to take reasonable precautions to keep the dog in check when not being used in police duties.

or

B. He was present and supervising the animal. In which case he failed to do his duty as a handler and restrain the dog or issue commands to keep the dog in check.

Either way, he is libel for the dog's actions and his failure to properly handle the dog.

It would be no different than if he mishandled the dog in a police situation. His immunity doesn't extend to negligent actions.
 
The plaintiff's lawyer is an idiot.

There clearly is one of two cases present with regard to the deputy here:

A. He wasn't present and supervising the animal, in which case he wasn't doing his duty as a K-9 handler. As the dog was unsupervised and got out of the yard or other enclosure, the handler failed to take reasonable precautions to keep the dog in check when not being used in police duties.

or

B. He was present and supervising the animal. In which case he failed to do his duty as a handler and restrain the dog or issue commands to keep the dog in check.

Either way, he is libel for the dog's actions and his failure to properly handle the dog.

It would be no different than if he mishandled the dog in a police situation. His immunity doesn't extend to negligent actions.

Yep. If you exchange the K9 for his service weapon, same deal. I don't understand why it was treated differently than if he had left his weapon lying around and someone used it to harm another.
 
Yep. If you exchange the K9 for his service weapon, same deal. I don't understand why it was treated differently than if he had left his weapon lying around and someone used it to harm another.
Because the plaintiffs hired an idiot...err lawyer. Most lawyers are idiots. They are little more than highly paid legal secretaries in a supervisory role.
 
Because the plaintiffs hired an idiot...err lawyer. Most lawyers are idiots. They are little more than highly paid legal secretaries in a supervisory role.

No, they're not all idiots. My brother-in-law is a retired atty. He served as a law clerk for years for one of Missouri's supreme court justices. He's also approved to practice before the U.S. Supreme Court. Before he went to law school, he was a critical care RN.

It's rare for a personal injury lawyer to take a case that he/she thinks can't be won. So yeah, this atty. must be a poor one.
 
No, they're not all idiots. My brother-in-law is a retired atty. He served as a law clerk for years for one of Missouri's supreme court justices. He's also approved to practice before the U.S. Supreme Court. Before he went to law school, he was a critical care RN.

It's rare for a personal injury lawyer to take a case that he/she thinks can't be won. So yeah, this atty. must be a poor one.
You have my sympathies.
 
Back
Top