'The Project' explores Project 2025's origins and goals to reshape American culture

What is Project 2025?​

Project 2025 is a federal policy agenda and blueprint for a radical restructuring of the executive branch authored and published by former Trump administration officials in partnership with The Heritage Foundation, a longstanding conservative think tank that opposes abortion and reproductive rights, LGBTQ rights, immigrants’ rights, and racial equity. Project 2025’s largest publication, “Mandate For Leadership,” is a 900-page manual for reorganizing the entire federal government agency by agency to serve a conservative agenda.


www.aclu.org

Project 2025, Explained | American Civil Liberties Union

Learn more about the Heritage Project initiative that threatens to erode our democracy — and how to fight it at ACLU.org.
www.aclu.org www.aclu.org
 

Project 2025: The Blueprint for Christian Nationalist Regime Change 🤢🤮​


Heritage Foundation’s president, Kevin Roberts, recently said, “We are in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be.”

He’s not exaggerating.

The plan is ambitious. The Mandate for Leadership is both specific in detail and vengeful in tone. Its central agenda is to impose a form of Christian nationalism on the United States. Christian nationalism believes that the Christian Bible, as God’s infallible law, should be the basis of government and have primacy over public and private institutions. Its patriarchal view does not recognize gender equality or gay rights and sanctions discrimination based on religious beliefs. Christian nationalist ideas are woven through the plans of Project 2025 and the pages of Mandate for Leadership. Its thousands of recommendations include specific executive orders to be repealed or implemented. Laws, regulations, departments, and whole agencies would be abolished. It portrays anyone who opposes its sweeping ambitions as being enemies of our republic.


kettering.org

Project 2025: The Blueprint for Christian Nationalist Regime Change

kettering.org kettering.org
 
Guno צְבִי said:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boWzW-oouwQ
Click to expand...
Let's unpack this video.

At roughly 20 seconds, a list of three things is posted up.

End of (DEI) programs

Massive immigration crackdown

Overhaul of federal workforce.

All three seem like great goals to achieve. What's wrong with ending what amounts to reverse racism and privilege (DEI)?

Cracking down on illegal aliens in the US and securing the border? That seems a self-evident good.

Improving the quality and efficiency of the federal workforce? Sounds good to me.

So, how can these be construed to be negatives?

Then they bring on a talking head from Politico, a source that generally, even overwhelmingly, hates Trump.

A litany of things supposedly from Project 2025 are cherry picked and then she contrasts this with the (Autopen) administration doing the opposite, or at least implying that. This circles back at 1:50 to the above three listed items.

Throughout this clip, there is an underlying assumption that Trump has done these things because of Project 2025, not just done them because he wanted to anyway regardless of Project 2025. That is, correlation does not imply causation.

correlation_does_not_equal_causation_square_sticker-rbb4880c04ef849f4927eea1fc62420fc_0ugmc_8byvr_630.jpg


Then you get the political opinion that (implied) Project 2025 is somehow evil and wrong and that Trump intended to implement it all along. "Harris warned us about this..." (~2:42)

Then comes unnamed "people within the administration" doing Project 2025 stuff (unspecified) and implying out of that that this is all wrong and evil.

In all of this, there isn't a single word about its effects or effectiveness. They never argue that mass deportations, for example, are bad. They just state they are happening, and imply that they are somehow bad.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Let's unpack this video.

At roughly 20 seconds, a list of three things is posted up.

End of (DEI) programs

Massive immigration crackdown

Overhaul of federal workforce.

All three seem like great goals to achieve. What's wrong with ending what amounts to reverse racism and privilege (DEI)?

Cracking down on illegal aliens in the US and securing the border? That seems a self-evident good.

Improving the quality and efficiency of the federal workforce? Sounds good to me.

So, how can these be construed to be negatives?

Then they bring on a talking head from Politico, a source that generally, even overwhelmingly, hates Trump.

A litany of things supposedly from Project 2025 are cherry picked and then she contrasts this with the (Autopen) administration doing the opposite, or at least implying that. This circles back at 1:50 to the above three listed items.

Throughout this clip, there is an underlying assumption that Trump has done these things because of Project 2025, not just done them because he wanted to anyway regardless of Project 2025. That is, correlation does not imply causation.

correlation_does_not_equal_causation_square_sticker-rbb4880c04ef849f4927eea1fc62420fc_0ugmc_8byvr_630.jpg


Then you get the political opinion that (implied) Project 2025 is somehow evil and wrong and that Trump intended to implement it all along. "Harris warned us about this..." (~2:42)

Then comes unnamed "people within the administration" doing Project 2025 stuff (unspecified) and implying out of that that this is all wrong and evil.

In all of this, there isn't a single word about its effects or effectiveness. They never argue that mass deportations, for example, are bad. They just state they are happening, and imply that they are somehow bad.
Click to expand...
You are a hatfull old maga cracka, thankfully your type is literally dying off. White xtian nationalists are poison to America may their demise be cause for celebration
 
In February 2024, the German bishops stated that ethnic nationalism is incompatible with Christianity and urged Christians to have nothing to do with one nationalistic party. Two months later, two U.S. bishops — John Stowe of Lexington, Kentucky, and Michael Burbidge of Arlington, Virginia — declared that authentic Catholic teaching was not compatible with Christian nationalism.

These American bishops did not identify a particular party, but the evidence is hiding in plain sight.

White Christian nationalism has provided powerful factions inside the Republican Party with a narrative for imposing an agenda called Project 2025, spelled out in a 920-page document. It was funded and promoted by the Heritage Foundation, written by conservative scholars, and identifies the dramatic changes that will be imposed on the country in a new Republican administration.


www.ncronline.org

With Project 2025, US bishops can't stand silently on the political sidelines

Contrasting the white Christian nationalist agenda of Project 2025 with the U.S. bishops' own "Faithful Citizenship" document demonstrates the moral danger in voting for a Republican president.
www.ncronline.org www.ncronline.org
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top