Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
it is objective morality.
Oklahoma Bible mandate challenged in Court
- Thread starter Cypress
- Start date
it is objective morality.
I knew you would eventually start retreating and moonwalking backwards away from moral relativism, and try in some convoluted way to prove you believe in objective morality.
Scream in CAPS all you want, but it doesn't make your claim any less preposterous that you restrain yourself from murder, rape, stealing, cheating because you are carefully thinking about how to "stabilize society".
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
building high trust societies, evidenced by collective flourishing, is objective morality.
only nazi eugenicist humanity haters promote otherwise.
The law of the jungle is not equivalent to proper human moral conscience.
Ants are designed to propagate their genetic information by maintaining and protecting the queen.
They are not sacrificing their resources to help competitor ants and non-kin groups of ants.
Ants have no abstract concept of beneficence or justice.
There is no scientific Darwinian evolutionary benefit to sacrificing your tribe's resources to help competitors, rivals, strangers, the terminally diseased and disabled. That requires a moral conscience.
If we are nothing except collections of quarks and electrons, it is delusional to claim every human life has inherent and innate value. You're lying to yourself.
You can claim it is your opinion that your life has innate value. But that doesn't change the fact you are only a finite collection of subatomic particles.
In your worldview of moral relativism, there is nothing objectively wrong for the Nazis to decide their sociey would benefit from the liquidation of inferior life forms like you, the physically disabled, and the mentally retarded.
It's only your opinion that it's wrong.
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
no. the golden rule goes to everyone, all humans. you keep ignoring this.
and yes. you're a nihilist Nazi.
we have established this.
you are an enemy of human life.
Golden rule is a religious moral concept, not a scientific Darwinian concept.
Hardly anyone on this board practices the Golden Rule. You can't be on this board for 30 minutes without being insulted, demeaned, threatened.
That right there tells you the Golden Rule is something we naturally resist. It's not a principle of science we naturally practice.
Even if our conscience tells us it's what we ought to do.
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
there's nothing religious or supernatural about reciprocal treatment of others.
if Jesus said 2+2=4 would you say math was religious?
as I do not care if it is done to me.
there are still pussies who are too sensitive.
that is not victimhood.
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
I reclaim Christianity on behalf of humanity.
You never practice the Golden Rule.
You have spent two decades on this board indulging in insults, foul mouthed belligerence, unrelenting belittlement.
That right there tells you the Golden Rule is something you and almost everyone else on this board resists.
It's not a scientific principle that everyone just naturally practices.
Jesus you are dishonest in a debate. (Honestly, Cy, this is all the more evidence that you would have FLAMED OUT in grad school. You can't defend your own position so you just lie about the opposition.
Wow. I knew you weren't that sharp but this is low-intellect behavior.
Engage with the point or leave. But don't be dishonest.
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
zero actual victims, karen.
you're a fucking Nazis who devalues human life.
cooperative species advantage is science.
its the nature of human evolution specifically.
your hate will be extinguished from earth.
Jesus will heart fuck you with his rod of love, against your will.
and you will thank him for it.
I didn't say it was, fuckwit. I said SOCIAL ANIMALS ALL SHARE A COMMON BEHAVIOR IN HAVING RULES FOR THE SOCIAL GROUP.
And humans are designed to propagate their genetic material as well. (Are you really a Creationist? YOu seem to hate evolution as much as you hate atheism)
But belief in magical fairies you can't see that beam the truth into your mind, that has scientific evidence?
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
If you and virtually no one else on this board consistently practices the Golden Rule, then there is no way can it be a scientific law of nature everyone just naturally practices.
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
its not always natural.
but our evolution is characterized by trying and succeeding.
its hard to do sometimes, and that's why we have laws.
to go back to your religious framework, we are all sinners, but we keep trying.
you nihilist Nazis want to abandon trying and just kill everybody because you have a dysgenic ideology created by Satan.
Humans almost never practice the Golden Rule, including the people on this board. Spending 30 minutes on this board is all the proof you need.
That means the Golden Rule is not a scientific principle of nature.
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
Your claim that the Golden Rule is a solid scientific principle of nature is laughable in the face of the fact you and almost nobody else here practices it.