Into the Night
Contributor
Why do you say he has no impact in the States, Gunky? He doesn't have to vote to have an impact in the States.
A little education for our Maga/Alt-Right friends.
- Thread starter Taichiliberal
- Start date
IBDaMann
Probably the worse human in the threads
It's more likely that you simply don't express yourself very well but drastically overestimate your ability nonetheless.
You have yet to post a coherent point. You don't even understand any rebuttals.
Yep, that's me, ...
When were you planning to start?
What you meant to say is that when someone crushes your argument, you put him on ignore for a month, so you have time to recover?
IBDaMann
Probably the worse human in the threads
You're talking to yourself again. You have no "readers".
So, your echo chamber didn't prepare you for the eventuality that your fallacies would be noted, revealed, explained and used to debunk your otherwise vapid and inane underlying argument. What a shame.
Let me know when you want to play again. None of your imaginary "friends" are going to waste any time with you when they could be numbing their minds in their echo chambers.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
1. Projection
2. Projection
3. A lie, as the chronology of the posts shows. Hell as anyone who's dealt with you over the years knows.
4. Childish retort
5. A fantasy as the chronology of the posts clearly shows.
Once again, another intellectually dishonest maga/alt-right clown thinks his revisionist rhetoric is sufficient to disprove what others say. Sad, but strangely entertaining. Let's watch for IBDman's next version of his SOS.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
1. The system states differently, as you and you moronic brethren are part of the "views" tally on my posts and thread, along with the likes and responses I get.
2. And beyond your worthless opinion, EXACTLY what post(s) did YOU or your brethren FACTUALLY disprove using VALID SOURCES and DOCUMENTATION? The reading audience awaits
3. Projection of a maga/alt-right blowhard. Pitiful.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
And as the rational, objective reader can see. Squawkie picks up the gauntlet for his moronic brethren and shows he's even a more preposterous figure! His bag of default phrases are (once again) improperly applied to discussions at hand, as the chronology of the posts shows. He can't debate on facts, so he just indulges in his self aggradizing rhetoric. That's all he has. He's done.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
1. Translation: a maga mook blowing smoke to try to either cover his ignorance or avoid admitting his failure or both.
2. Squawkie must be off his meds! Realizing he can't debate in print using facts and logic mistook much for him. I hope he gets help.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Actually, you're not talking about anything. You just post a word. The chronology of the posts shows what your responding to. Since the readers are not privy to the what's on your mind, you'll have to elucidate by typing it out. We'll wait.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Projection and childish babble....take your medicine.
IBDaMann
Probably the worse human in the threads
You haven't said anything to counter my evisceration of your video other than "nuh-uh."
You haven't posted another video that attempts to make your point in some valid way without committing any gross fallacies.
You have forfeited. The discussion died with the ball in your court. You watched strike three fly by. Hit the showers.
You still haven't made any valid point on JPP. You are a raving lunatic.
IBDaMann
Probably the worse human in the threads
You stated that you were not addressing me. That leaves only your imaginary "readers."
Just because someone looks at your post, sees that it's yours and scrolls onto something that is value-added, you shouldn't delude yourself into believing that it was somehow another one of your imaginary "readers".
You don't know my opinion. You haven't stated any sort of valid argument on which I can opine.
Your raving literaly contains no salvageable concepts.
Yep, you forfeit. Your arguments have to pass internal consistency, i.e. they can't contain glaring fallacies.
Go find a video that isn't fallacious on its face. Oh, and learn what "Cause > Effect" means.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
And here's where IBDaMan's facade of intellectual honesty, courage and competence comes to a crashing halt. He doesn't have the cojones to let the reader see what he is actually responding to. Instead he inserts his opinion followed by a screed loaded with accusations he cannot prove beyond his own generalized and vague denouncements. In his world, only IBDaMan's narrow views are important an legit.
But as always, the chronology of the posts will always be his undoing, I leave him to his delusional "victory".
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
1.
and I'm sure the grinning fool in your mirror nods in agreement with this desperate blather of yours. Once again, you deluse yourself into thinking your opinions are on par with facts and the logic derived from them. Ask yourself, why are you reading and responding you my post to others if my material is assumed not worth reading by others who just scrolll by? And how do yo explain the likes I receive? And does not your "logic" apply to yourself?2. If you have no opinion, then why post a response to me when I debating others. Why comment to others about my posts? Are you off your meds or just under a delusion of intelligence?
3. Projection.
4. Projection.
5. You stupidly keep trying to use a phrase while denying how it fits directly into the OP video regarding the DOCUMENTED generational effects of red lining and a bias application of th GI Bill.
Now blow smoke as usual. I leave the reading audience to judge your insipidly stubborn repetitious stupidity.
the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts
Same shit. Every day.
Same shit. Every day.
IBDaMann
Probably the worse human in the threads
Too late. You have already forfeited. You whimpered away with your head hung low. You were humiliated and you don't know what you can do to save face, except to begin a long chain of pivots to irrelevance.
You still haven't said anything to counter my evisceration of your video other than "nuh-uh."
You still haven't posted another video that attempts to make your point in some valid way without committing any gross fallacies.
You have forfeited. The discussion died with the ball in your court. You watched strike three fly by. Hit the showers.
You still haven't made any valid point on JPP. You continue to be nothing more than a raving lunatic.
IBDaMann
Probably the worse human in the threads
You missed a few:
"the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts"
There, FTFY.
IBDaMann
Probably the worse human in the threads
... but you are mistaken. You haven't gotten anything correct.
Am I free to fix the grammar of the question before I ask myself?
The correct answer is ... they just scroll by, because your material is correctly assumed to not be worth reading. What do I win?
Every single one is a like from a political ally who is similarly not wasting any time reading what he knows is regurgitation from the echo chamber, and is instead just dropping you a "thumbs up" to bolster your score. I notice that not a single one offered any sort of reply, precisely because nobody knows what you wrote.
My purpose is to dissect arguments. I am pointing out that your argument, as expressed in your video, is sadly based on a fallacy, and per the rules of logic that you cannot grasp, your argument carries the truth value of FALSE.
My job is done. You haven't begun yours.
That's a question, not an argument.
Lame. Third-graders have you beat.
No, you are the one who keeps betting the farm on the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts the chronology of the posts
I get it, you're trying to back door your Cause > Effect fallacy back into the discussion ... except that it is still a fallacy and your argument is FALSE.
It appears that @Rusty Bell 65 grasps the main gist of your argument.
FTFY. Get to work on a valid argument.
WCM
Verified User
Yet far more in tune with decency, morality and common sense within your borders.
You should be embarrassed Guno, yet here you are still running your childish mouth about adult topics.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Poor Rusty. I've whupped his ass so many times that I now live rent free in his mind!
