Hitler was on the Right side of the spectrum. . .

[Into the Night]

Adolf Hitler and the Nazi regime are classified as far-right rather than left-wing because their core policies, actions, and alliances targeted leftist movements, preserved private enterprise, and promoted racial hierarchy instead of class equality. [1, 2, 3, 4]

Hitler was a fascist and a communist and a racist, Kewpie. That happens to be the core policies, actions, and goals of the DEMOCRATS.

Destruction of the Left

• • Banned and persecuted leftists: Immediately after taking power in 1933, Hitler used the Reichstag Fire Decree to arrest and imprison communists, socialists, and trade union leaders, making them the very first inmates in Nazi concentration camps. [1, 2]

He imprisoned Stalin communist, not Nazi communists.
Hitler didn't want any competition for his socialism from Stalin.

• • Outlawed trade unions: Hitler abolished independent trade unions, replacing them with the state-run German Labour Front, which stripped workers of the right to strike and bargained in favor of industrial production. [1, 2]

This is fascism and communism, Kewpie.

• • Prohibited leftist parties: The US Holocaust Memorial Museum notes that the Nazi regime officially banned the Communist Party and the Social Democratic Party, eliminating any left-wing political opposition. [1]

He didn't.

Economic and Social Structure

• • Preserved private property: Unlike the Marxist left, which sought the collective ownership of the means of production and the expropriation of private property, Hitler partnered with wealthy industrialists and kept private property intact, provided businesses served the war effort. [1]

He didn't.

• • Privatization: During the 1930s, the Nazi regime embarked on a massive campaign of selling off state-owned railways, banks, and steel mills to private capitalists—coining the term privatisierung (privatization).

He didn't. These industries were under Hitlers fascism, another form of socialism, Kewpie.

• • Purge of the socialist wing (Night of the Long Knives): In 1934, Hitler ordered the execution of Gregor Strasser and Ernst Röhm alongside leadership elements of the Sturmabteilung (SA). This purged the anti-capitalist, pseudo-socialist working-class faction within his own party (Strasserism) to secure the backing of traditional German military elites and conservative capitalists. [1]

He didn't purge the socialist wing. It would be purging themselves.

Ideology of Hierarchy and Nationalism

• • Racial supremacy over class struggle: Left-wing politics center on class conflict and the abolition of social classes. Hitler explicitly rejected this, arguing that race and the supremacy of the "Aryan" nation mattered more than economic class. [1, 2]

The same kind of racism that Democrats have.
There is no 'economic class'.

• • Alliances with traditional elites: Hitler rose to power through coalitions with conservative nationalists, monarchists, and military leaders who viewed him as a useful tool to crush the political left and stabilize Germany. [1, 2]

Never happened, Kewpie.

 

[Into the Night]

Your own citation PROVES you do not understand what the words Subjective versus Objective mean.

Your word games won't work, Kewpie. Attempted proof by word game.

A discussion on whether Hitler is right wing or left wing is SUBJECTIVE by default. It is dealing in definitions created by man, that are subjective, have some fluidity and not everyone will agree upon.

Irrelevance fallacy.

At no point, NONE, is a question of 'was HItler right or left wing' a OBJECTIVE discussion not, AS YOU OWN LINK SAYS TERRY "..,.Objective most commonly means not influenced by an individual’s personal viewpoint...

Hitler was a socialist, a communist, and a facist, and was racist. All the same qualities that Democrats have. You can't blame your problems on Trump or Republicans, Kewpie. Inversion fallacy.

This entire discussion is BY DEFAULT influenced by individuals views right down to which definitions APPLY and which ones do not.

Your word games won't work, Kewpie.

YOu need to try and be less stupid and try to understand big words you try to use and then stop doing it, as you ALWAYS get them wrong.

Inversion fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

I will post it again, since you are intent to ignore it and point out THOSE LARGE WORDS ARE DATA. THINGS HITLER ACTUALLY DID!

Not data, and not what Hitler did.

 

[Hume]

There is no Lake Ontario, Hugo.

There is no Lake Ontario, Hugo.

 

[Hume]

You don't get to speak for everyone, Hugo. Omniscience fallacy.

You don't get to speak for everyone, Hugo. Omniscience fallacy.

 

[Hume]

Random cliche. Random words. No apparent coherency.

Random cliche. Random words. No apparent coherency

 

[T. A. Gardner]

It is clear that I was referring to the French Revolution. Those who opposed Monarchy sat on the left.

One authoritarian government was replaced by another that went out of its way to slaughter the previous one.

 

[AProudLefty]

One authoritarian government was replaced by another that went out of its way to slaughter the previous one.

So the right?

 

[T. A. Gardner]

So the right?

Both were Leftist. Authoritarianism is a Leftist value.

 

[AProudLefty]

Both were Leftist. Authoritarianism is a Leftist value.

You're confusing yourself. Those who opposed Monarchy sat on the left. That's where the terms came from.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

You're confusing yourself. Those who opposed Monarchy sat on the left. That's where the terms came from.

Okay, those replacing the Leftist monarchy were even more radical Leftists than the monarchy.

 

[Matt Dillon]

You see, when you’re wrong, you deflect.

 

[AProudLefty]

Okay, those replacing the Leftist monarchy were even more radical Leftists than the monarchy.

So the right?

 

[T. A. Gardner]

So the right?

Many communes, much of the Old West in the US, that sort of thing. Simply being to the Right of someone more radical on the Left doesn't put you on the Right.



It comes back this graph.

 

[AProudLefty]

Many communes, much of the Old West in the US, that sort of thing. Simply being to the Right of someone more radical on the Left doesn't put you on the Right.

View attachment 95954

It comes back this graph.

Did you create the graph?

What would make a government right wing?

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Did you create the graph?

What would make a government right wing?

Yes. That's because every political graph I've ever seen makes ZERO sense as to how persons, parties, whatever are placed. No sense whatsoever.

 

[AProudLefty]

Yes. That's because every political graph I've ever seen makes ZERO sense as to how persons, parties, whatever are placed. No sense whatsoever.

It's quite simple. The terms "left" and "right" came from the French Revolution. You're smarter than that.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

It's quite simple. The terms "left" and "right" came from the French Revolution. You're smarter than that.

If they do then they are ill-defined and archaic.

 

[AProudLefty]

If they do then they are ill-defined and archaic.

Because you say so? History doesn't back you up.

You said that Kim Jong Un is a monarch. Which side would his followers have sat?

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Because you say so? History doesn't back you up.

You said that Kim Jong Un is a monarch. Which side would his followers have sat?

Yes, he is. He is the sole head of state in N. Korea. He is above the law. His position is hereditary. He is on the Left politically.