Epstein "victims"

Life is Golden said:
They went back for years for the money. They knew the deal, just as you or I would have.

Suddenly, decades later they became "victims" after there was more money to be gained by morphing into one.

This isn't rocket science.
Click to expand...
No, it’s victim blaming.
 
Life is Golden said:
They went back for years for the money. They knew the deal, just as you or I would have.

Suddenly, decades later they became "victims" after there was more money to be gained by morphing into one.

This isn't rocket science.
Click to expand...
Right...

Because girls from 9 years old and up should be equal to multi billionaire old men in terms of seeing thru predatory actions and society should just stay out of it.



According to U.S. congressional reviews of unsealed Department of Justice files, records explicitly mention victims who were 14, 10, and 9 years old. [1]
Click to expand...
 
QP! said:
Right...

Because girls from 9 years old and up should be equal to multi billionaire old men in terms of seeing thru predatory actions and society should just stay out of it.
Click to expand...
Its not clear to me that girls that young were part of the operation other than just being around sometimes. They wanted females that wanted to be there, that would not be a problem, that would for instance keep their mouths shut....like 14 and up.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
Its not clear to me that girls that young were part of the operation other than just being around sometimes. They wanted females that wanted to be there, that would not be a problem, that would for instance keep their mouths shut....like 14 and up.
Click to expand...
I don't give Epstein any benefit of the doubt.

...The released image shows Epstein and two other men sitting calmly at a table operating a laptop. Underneath the table, a woman in a bikini is crawling on the floor. A painting of a nude infant hangs on the wall behind them. The woman's body and the infant's genital area in the painting were pixelated before release. The photo's origin and location are unclear, though Epstein's pants bear the initials "LSJ," possibly referring to his private island, Little Saint James...
Click to expand...
Screenshot_2026-02-10_at_7_41_40_PM.png


Screenshot_2026-02-10_at_7_41_53_PM.png
 
QP! said:
Right...

Because girls from 9 years old and up should be equal to multi billionaire old men in terms of seeing thru predatory actions and society should just stay out of it.
Click to expand...
They weren't 9 year olds. Most were 15, 16, 17, 18. Old enough to say no and refuse to go back.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
Its not clear to me that girls that young were part of the operation other than just being around sometimes. They wanted females that wanted to be there, that would not be a problem, that would for instance keep their mouths shut....like 14 and up.
Click to expand...
While i think the vast majority of Epstein girls were likely around 14 and up, he was a black mailer and if he could find a billionaire who wanted a full on pedophilic relationship, i think Epstein gladly provides it.

I think that is exactly what he had on Leon Black.

Everyone agrees that it makes no sense that Black would give Epstein full Executor custody over his estate and hundreds of millions of dollars for private jets and islands for just an 'embarrassing' relationship with a gal who was legal but young.
 
Life is Golden said:
They weren't 9 year olds. Most were 15, 16, 17, 18. Old enough to say no and refuse to go back.
Click to expand...
Says you as you race to defend all things Trump.

I will stick to the information released in the Epstein files which show 9 and 10 years old and up.
 
Life is Golden said:
Why did they keep coming back?

They knew this involved a creepy older man who wanted massages and sex, yet they returned willingly for years and accepted money, tuition, luxury items, and other benefits.

I believe they made the choice to continue returning. It only became a problem decades later when they saw there was a possble windfall from being a so-called victim.
Click to expand...
Epstein for sure capitalized on the the fact there's a lot of young, gullible, pretty women out there who will do things for money.
Idk about the pedo and frazzledripping stuff. Have not seen anything with a direct link.
Oh, that's so nasty. :(
Supposedly Wiener had a deadman switch on his laptop. Where is that?
 
Last edited:
QP! said:
I will stick to the information released in the Epstein files which show 9 and 10 years old and up.
Click to expand...


That 9- and 10-year-old claim comes from lawmakers (Jamie Raskin and Ro Khanna) who claimed they'd reviewed remaining unredacted DOJ files in February 2026 and told reporters they saw mentions of girls that young. Raskin specifically said he saw a reference to a 9-year-old. Those files have not been fully released to the public, so the statement is second-hand claim.

So the faggot's post is using the lawmakers' allegations of the still-redacted files to push back on the "they were old enough to say no" argument.
 
Diogenes said:
That 9- and 10-year-old claim comes from lawmakers (Jamie Raskin and Ro Khanna) who claimed they'd reviewed remaining unredacted DOJ files in February 2026 and told reporters they saw mentions of girls that young. Raskin specifically said he saw a reference to a 9-year-old. Those files have not been fully released to the public, so the statement is second-hand claim.

So the faggot's post is using the lawmakers' allegations of the still-redacted files to push back on the "they were old enough to say no" argument.
Click to expand...
Ray McGovern said today on Dialog Works that the youngest credible claim is 13.
 
I have a theory.


Why didn’t the man who shamelessly pawed underage girls in public and on camera ever release the government’s Epstein investigative files?


Not the civil depositions a judge unsealed in January 2024.

Not flight logs that had already leaked years earlier.

The actual FBI/DOJ investigative files — grand-jury material, seized digital evidence, the 300-gigabyte cache, the case file that later took an act of a GOP majority Congress to try to access.

Those sat under lock and key in the Democrat-controlled Justice Department for the entire Biden presidency.

Timeline:

  • The two federal investigations were 2006–08 (Bush) and 2019 (Trump 1). Epstein was arrested and died in 2019. Maxwell was tried and convicted in 2021 — on gropin' Joe Biden’s watch.
  • Creepy Joe Biden’s DOJ did not release the government’s investigative files. Judges unsealed some civil records from Giuffre v. Maxwell. That is not the same thing as DOJ opening the case file.
  • The big dumps of the investigative records came after Congress passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act in November 2025. Handsy Joe was on his beach in Delaware by then.

The man who reportedly showered with his own underage daughter was POTUS.

His Justice Department had four years to spill the beans.

Ghislaine Maxwell was already convicted, and Democrats had every political incentive in the world to open up the whole record.

They didn’t.
 
Life is Golden said:
Why did they keep coming back?

They knew this involved a creepy older man who wanted massages and sex, yet they returned willingly for years and accepted money, tuition, luxury items, and other benefits.

I believe they made the choice to continue returning. It only became a problem decades later when they saw there was a possble windfall from being a so-called victim.
Click to expand...
What you believe is irrelevant. Why do you think they call it sex trafficking?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top