Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's dissent on a case was so absurd that even fellow liberal Justice Sonya Sotomayor was forced to correct her.
www.bizpacreview.com
In January 2022, one year after Joe Biden assumed the White House, Justice Stephen Breyer of the US Supreme Court announced his impending retirement. Biden, who had selected the intellectually challen...
uk.news.yahoo.com
Justice’s strange analogy during major birthright citizenship case raises eyebrows as Donald Trump watches from the courtroom.
bigleaguepolitics.substack.com
If Harvard Law School grads were paying attention to Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson's testimony in responding to Sen. Marsha Blackburn's simple but revealing question on defining
www.americanthinker.com
She's a stone cold idiot.
The articles provided are ALL opinion blogs rewriting standard, high-level legal definitions and judicial caution as 'cluelessness.'
If you look at her actual resume—magna cum laude from Harvard, federal appellate judge, district judge, public defender, and a unanimous 'Well Qualified' rating from the non-partisan American Bar Association—she is objectively one of the most qualified legal minds on the bench. Disagreeing with her legal philosophy is fair, but pretending she lacks intelligence relies entirely on taking legal jargon out of context.
---------
AI Fact check:
The forum user is
pulling from hyper-partisan blogs and op-eds that strip complex legal arguments or standard political friction entirely out of context to manufacture an narrative.
When evaluating a Supreme Court Justice's credentials, the objective, gold-standard benchmark used by the U.S. Senate is the
American Bar Association (ABA) Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary. The ABA unanimously rated Ketanji Brown Jackson
"Well Qualified"—
their highest possible rating—following an exhaustive peer-review process evaluating her legal ability, professional competence, and integrity. [
1,
2]
When professional watchdog groups actually looked at her data, the numbers spoke for themselves. The Alliance for Justice tracked her entire career on the bench: out of nearly 600 written legal decisions, her rulings were only reversed 12 times. That is an incredibly strong record for any judge, showing her mastery of federal law. Even conservative groups like the Federalist Society didn't attack her resume or competence; they just disagreed with her judicial philosophy.
The idea that she isn't qualified is completely contradicted by the data.
www.theguardian.com
