Ketanji Brown Jackson criticizes supreme court’s handling of emergency docket

"Now why would anyone possibly be against us using the girls bathroom? WTF???"
giphy.gif




a drag queen with a beard is eating a pizza and says welllll .
 
You have to remember,........these are the same people who literally voted for an AUTOPEN.

White House 'Walk of Fame' represents Biden with autopen picture
 
I am not impressed with her background any more than I was impressed with Obama's.

She's an idiot. He's a scammer.

As for the ABA, it is partisan and biased regardless of what it claims.

Despite claiming to be nonpartisan, the ABA has supported and lobbied for a broad left-of-center agenda on issues including criminal justice policy, immigration, abortion, LGBT issues, and gun control. In recent years, the ABA has adopted lobbying priorities including legal status for nearly all illegal immigrants living in the United States, the repeal of mandatory-minimum sentencing laws, taxpayer-funded abortions for low-income Americans, and the implementation of affirmative action programs.



You hate it when the rule of law rips you evil fucks a new one huh



How much unreported grift did thomas take?
 
Last edited:
  • Judicial Activism Concerns: Senators like Lindsey Graham stated that Jackson might set aside the plain text of laws to favor progressive outcomes. [1]
  • Progressive Originalism: Critics challenge her approach to the Fourteenth Amendment, where she has argued that the framers intended the amendment to be race-conscious during the Reconstruction era to protect civil rights. Opponents view this as a departure from a colorblind reading of the Constitution
  • If she is dishonest about not knowing what a woman is, she is dishonest about other things, including the Constitution.
And the magat Justices created via SC vote the concept that does not exist in the Constitution of Presidential Immunity.

Something if either the Executive or Congress would have tried to create would require a full blown Constitutional Amendment process involving super majorities in each house with State votes also passing it.

They just decided they would write a Constitutional Amendment because they could.
 
And the magat Justices created via SC vote the concept that does not exist in the Constitution of Presidential Immunity.

Something if either the Executive or Congress would have tried to create would require a full blown Constitutional Amendment process involving super majorities in each house with State votes also passing it.

They just decided they would write a Constitutional Amendment because they could.
Correction

Because they thought they could get away with it


They will pay for it
 
Back
Top