Moral relativism

Ok. WHY is female genital mutilation immoral in your opinion?

Golden rule ethical thinking.

Would you like the head of your penis lopped off? No?

Then don’t lop off anybody else’s parts unless you’ve asked at an age they can consent and they’ve say “Sure thing.”

None of this kind of stuff is very hard. Just flip it about and then don’t do anything to others you wouldn’t want done to you. Easy.
 
Argument of the Stone fallacy.

RQAA. Stop asking the same question over and over and over and over mindlessly. It's been answered.
Start answering the questions and I'll stop asking them.

What SPECIFICALLY about the act of FGM makes the it immoral?
 
Last edited:
Golden rule ethical thinking.

Would you like the head of your penis lopped off? No?

Then don’t lop off anybody else’s parts unless you’ve asked at an age they can consent and they’ve say “Sure thing.”

None of this kind of stuff is very hard. Just flip it about and then don’t do anything to others you wouldn’t want done to you. Easy.
So you think changing a diaper is immoral?
 
RQAA. Stop being mindless. I've already answered your question.
Stop pretending you've answered questions, actually answer them and I'll stop asking. All you said was that you saw it as immoral because of your personal moral views.

Now I'm asking what is it about FGM specifically that you find immoral and why?
 
You don't want answers; you want to virtue signal. You don't want to have a discussion; you want to shout down differing views.

As it stands, you don't understand "relative vs. absolute", "qualitative vs. quantitative," or "subjective vs. objective." You have nothing of value to contribute to this topic, and are only participating to waste bandwidth.

Noting your educational shortfall, I can see why others don't treat you as though you belong in this thread.

The minute you and @IBDaMann started dancing around an answer, the future was clear.
Too funny! You're too stupid to understand what I wrote, so you mischaracterize my response as "dancing around an answer", all in order to blame me for your frustration at not being able to read for comprehension.

You weren't gonna answer.
I like your reenactment of the "Sour Grapes" fable by Aesop.
 
You don't want answers; you want to virtue signal. You don't want to have a discussion; you want to shout down differing views.

As it stands, you don't understand "relative vs. absolute", "qualitative vs. quantitative," or "subjective vs. objective." You have nothing of value to contribute to this topic, and are only participating to waste bandwidth.

Noting your educational shortfall, I can see why others don't treat you as though you belong in this thread.


Too funny! You're too stupid to understand what I wrote, so you mischaracterize my response as "dancing around an answer", all in order to blame me for your frustration at not being able to read for comprehension.


I like your reenactment of the "Sour Grapes" fable by Aesop.
123 words
614 characters
738 characters including spaces

0 answers to my question

That's a lot of work to fail....

tenor.gif
 
Last edited:
Back
Top