Predictions for the 2026 Midterms

[Into the Night]

What you present yourself as is a partisan.

So do you.

Your guy right or wrong. Even when your guy is an obvious crook with a rap sheet as long as the dining room table.

What crime? What 'rap sheet'?

You do deny the obvious.

Inversion fallacy.

Trump is what the public record makes of him.

No. Trump is what his mother and father made.

He proves it almost everyday in his continuing feathering of his nest from behind the Resolute Desk, where your lot put him, at the cost of yourselves and everyone you’ve dragged along for this very bumpy ride.

Attempted proof in open functional system.
Trump has the authority to decorate his office as he pleases.
What 'bumpy ride'?
TDS.

You prove the above every time you call the obvious false.

Attempted proof in open functional system.
Buzzword fallacy. Go learn what 'proof' means.
Your hallucinations are our own problem. You can't blame them on anybody else.

 

[Into the Night]

I’ve done what I’ve accomplished which was to level up my station, work a man’s job from the age of 13, help others for a living, make decisions in moments others get to review over weeks and longer, many of them impacting life and liberty, Lived to tell about it. Been successful in small business and navigate to retirement, seeing most of this before it’s coming to put myself in a place where, even at 70, I’m helping those with less foresight.

I’ve got a track record to point at that backs up my perception. I trust you can say as much?

Stop pretending.
Courtier's fallacy.
Cliche fallacy.

You are a nothing. You are obviously uneducated. You continue to have grammatical problems. You continue to ignore history, even recent history. You ignore the Constitution of the United States and all State constitutions. You cannot run a successful business on socialism.

 

[Into the Night]

^^^^0h and I forgot to mention^^^^

All of which is known to anyone that it is important for me to know it, and with no need or desire to prove it to anyone else.

Which I also hope is a situation others here enjoy.

I wish you well…

You don't get to speak for everyone.
Omniscience fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Like I said, there is a track record. There are metrics I can point to if I was of a mind to do so.

Cliche fallacy.
Argument from randU fallacy. No metrics. Random numbers are not data.

OK, now you are sounding like we are approaching similar ground. I have no great love of the oligarchical minded.

Blatant lie.

The wealthy are a necessary component of any capitalist system, and I am a capitalist,

Blatant lie. You despise capitalism. Socialism is not capitalism.

but they shouldn't be given political power. They do not, as a rule, play well with others and are frequently ethically small minded.

Again, you show you have never run a successful business.
If you don't serve your customers, you won't be in business long!

Trump is a successful real estate developer. He has been elected President of the United States twice (some say three times!).

You are a nothing. You have accomplished nothing. All you can do is whine about Trump.

Being a survivor who did so without doing harm to others, who climbed as high as they could without using the backs of others, is something to be proud of in any economy,

You again show you have no idea what it takes to run a successful business.

 

[Into the Night]

Everytime you leave something like this for public eyes to see you prove to the majority of those reading along that you are a tad unhinged.

Mantra 1d insult fallacy. Lame.

 

[Into the Night]

I’m not concerned with what you perceive about me.

Says the idiot that constantly tries to puff himself up with fake credentials.
DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!

Your conclusions on Trump’s fitness for leadership already prove to DISCERNING individuals you haven’t a clue about people.

Attempted proof in open functional system.
You don't get to speak for everyone. Omniscience fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Says the man who voted thrice for the fraud because he thinks the scripted reality TV game show host is POTUS material.

Random words. No apparent coherency.

You’re the example. Your posts are all the proof required. Seriously. It’s why I respond, to give you another opportunity to show it.

Attempted proof in open functional system.
Argument of the Stone fallacy.
Bulverism fallacy.

MAGA is sad, but what is sadder is we all have to get dragged along for the ride.

MAGA is not a person.
You don't get to speak for everyone. Omniscience fallacy.

Our current situation with inflation,

Caused by Democrats. It was DEMOCRATS that brought about fiat currency. It was DEMOCRATS that caused the last two economic depressions, both of which devalued the dollar severely.

gas pricing, energy costs, the war with Iran… it’s all on MAGA. It’s YOUR fault.

MAGA is not a person.
Gasoline price is not dictated by anyone.
Energy prices are not dictated by anyone.
The United States has no troops in Iran.
I'm glad Trump finally did something about Iran.
It was DEMOCRATS that set Iran on it's current warlike stance.

You non-discerners, fact deniers,

Go learn what 'fact' means. Go learn what 'discern' means.

who put Trump in office when it was obvious he was unfit due to character and ethics issues. All of this is on you.

The President is not elected by popular vote, Pretender.

MAGA truly screwed the pooch on this and we are all paying, literally, for it.

MAGA isn't a person.

That’s the issue. Please deal with that. Fix it before you make it worse.

What issue?
Fix what?

Void argument fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

I voted Libertarian, because the state I reside in was predetermined.

So you don't vote.

It votes Democratic since Reagan in POTUS election. But if it wasn’t I’d have voted democratic with Trump as the Republican candidate. I always put character and ethics before my politics. The way any right thinking voter ought to.

Pretending isn't ethical, Pretender.
You don't get to speak for everyone. Omniscience fallacy.
You don't get to declare your way of thinking is 'right thinking' for everyone. Omniscience fallacy.

I don’t recall ever saying that. Post the link.

DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!

No way to know with Trump. There are those who swear he’ll resort to tactical nukes. I don’t think he’s that dumb but I can’t 100% rule it out. Same situation with troops. I don’t think he’ll do it but… we’ll know for sure when Trump is out or the war has ended.

What war?

That’s insane. The Russian invasion of Ukraine caused the war.

The United States is not fighting either Russia nor Ukraine.

You don’t know that? You say some pretty whacky shite.

Inversion fallacy.

I’m driven by ethics and common sense. Try it sometime.

You don't get to speak for everyone. Omniscience fallacy.
I don't agree with your ethics.

 

[Into the Night]

This is getting old. The points are made.

Yet you choose to repeat them, like a mindless mantra.

As I said these exchanges on my part are to allow exposure of the MAGA mindset, but we’ve driven the audience from the room. The last pages are just we four going at it.

MAGA isn't a person.
You don't get to speak for everyone. Omniscience fallacy.

 

[Uncensored2008]

He gave Trump’s inauguration a cool million.

Nope - and you've been corrected on this several times. That means you are deliberately lying at this point.

He gave it another million in Amazon live streaming support.

This is a new trope - which hate site did you get this nonsense from?

He gave $40 million for Trump’s wife’s movie b

Another blatant lie you've been corrected repeatedly on.

Bezos blocked WaPo’s endorsement of Harris in 2024.

Bullshit.

Bezos narrowed the scope of WaPo’s editorial pages to personal liberties and free markets in February 2025. That made things like the Epstein files out of bounds.

Are you HONESTLY trying to sell the lie that WaPo is "right wing?"

LOL

Do you ever post anything that isn't an outright lie?

Hey, you're a democrat - no ethics or integrity.

 

[Uncensored2008]

If the Democrats win either the house or senate the Trumppers will cry and scream without any evidence that there was massive fraud.

If you don't want the Americans to think you are engaged in fraud, stop blocking voter ID and periodic cleansing of voter registration rolls.

The fact that you fight, spending billions, even the most basic common sense integrity measures shows that fraud is the intent of you and your party.

 

[Uncensored2008]

So do you.

What crime? What 'rap sheet'?

34 counts of entering into a Non-Disclosure Agreement. The thugocracy of New York has a special law that if you defeat the democrats in a presidential election, perfectly legal NDA's a FELONIES.

Just like if someone accuses you of rape 35 years after the fact, with no police report, no witnesses, not a shred of evidence - you are GUILTY even if proven innocent if you are Donald Trump. New York is a very special place. "Laws" are specific to individuals. New laws can be found in an instant and applied to specific enemies of the party.

Not since the Khmer Rouge has a state operated in the way New York does.

 

[ModernDiogenes]

And with of your 10 posts of unhinged bloviation I rest my case. Thank you.

 

[ModernDiogenes]

Nope - and you've been corrected on this several times. That means you are deliberately lying at this point.



This is a new trope - which hate site did you get this nonsense from?



Another blatant lie you've been corrected repeatedly on.



Bullshit.



Are you HONESTLY trying to sell the lie that WaPo is "right wing?"

LOL

Do you ever post anything that isn't an outright lie?

Hey, you're a democrat - no ethics or integrity.

You’ve not made a case yet. Just attacks. No information to back up anything. Nada. I point to court cases, books, articles, etc. You point to…. Air. Say bullshit, cast insults. Suggest you know me, someone you’ve exchanged a few posts with in a forum, better than I know myself.

It’s all very boring.

 

[Uncensored2008]

You’ve not made a case yet.

What case is that? You have made claims that you not only fail to support, but which have repeatedly been refuted.

Such as Jeff Bezos "gave $40 million for Trump’s wife’s movie." I personally refuted that several times - yet you persist in flat out lying.

{Bezos has repeatedly and publicly denied any personal involvement. In a May 2026 interview on CNBC’s Squawk Box, he called claims that he was involved “a falsehood that will not die,” stated “I had nothing to do with that,” and noted that both Amazon and Melania’s office have denied it. He described the company’s decision as a “good business decision” based on audience interest, while emphasizing it was made by the Amazon team, not by him.}

Jeff Bezos Defends ‘Melania’ Documentary as a ‘Very Wise Business Decision,’ Denies It Was a ‘Way of Buying Influence’ With Trump Administration

Jeff Bezos insists that Amazon MGM Studios' decision to acquire and release "Melania," a documentary about the First Lady, was smart business -- and not an attempt to curry favor with her husband.

variety.com

Yet you continue to lie.

Just attacks. No information to back up anything. Nada.

I back up everything I claim. You, not so much.

You avoid pointing to where you come up with the crap you post for obvious reasons. You are just parroting the sleaziest of leftist hate sites.

I point to court cases, books, articles, etc.

You virtually never do so. You chant leftist mantras that you get from hate sites.

Most of the crap you chant has been repeatedly debunked

You point to…. Air. Say bullshit, cast insults. Suggest you know me, someone you’ve exchanged a few posts with in a forum, better than I know myself.

This is a message board - you are what you post.

What you post is fringe left and generally dishonest. You SEEM to think that since you are defaming and slandering the enemy of your party that lying is acceptable - good in fact.

It’s all very boring.

Gain some integrity.

 

[ModernDiogenes]

What case is that? You have made claims that you not only fail to support, but which have repeatedly been refuted.

Such as Jeff Bezos "gave $40 million for Trump’s wife’s movie." I personally refuted that several times - yet you persist in flat out lying.

{Bezos has repeatedly and publicly denied any personal involvement.

Different point, not about me, so I’m addressing it.

It’s public record. He’s the major stock holder and Executive Chairman of the board. It was his call. You actually trying to refute it by stating Amazon is a publicly held corporation and Bezos’ claims make any sense: That his company spends $40 large and the Executive Chairman of the board had nothing to say about it? Really? If that’s the case the stock holders ought to fire him. (Like that could truly happen…)

The cost of production and advertisement are public record.

Don’t say it wasn’t pointed to. ALL that I’ve pointed to about Trump is, ALL OF IT, public record. The lawsuits, the divorces, the 4th estate coverage, the books, the articles, his own words. The medical professionals who put their names to their documentation and declaration that Trump is a pathological case. All there to be seen. Not my fault that you deny the obvious when it’s right there before you.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Different point, not about me, so I’m addressing it.

It’s public record. He’s the major stock holder and Executive Chairman of the board. It was his call. You actually trying to refute it by stating Amazon is a publicly held corporation and Bezos’ claims make any sense: That his company spends $40 large and the Executive Chairman of the board had nothing to say about it? Really? If that’s the case the stock holders ought to fire him. (Like that could truly happen…)

The cost of production and advertisement are public record.

Don’t say it wasn’t pointed to. ALL that I’ve pointed to about Trump is, ALL OF IT, public record. The lawsuits, the divorces, the 4th estate coverage, the books, the articles, his own words. The medical professionals who put their names to their documentation and declaration that Trump is a pathological case. All there to be seen. Not my fault that you deny the obvious when it’s right there before you.

Again, public record - Bezos is confirmed by far left Variety no less, to not be directly involved. And it's absurd to think the CEO of billion dollar enterprises get involved in day to day decisions. Yet you persist in lying - because your rage forces you to slander Trump and anyone around him.

You made a claim, it was a lie. I proved it to be a lie. Then you made the same claim again, and again.

You are a democrat, you have no integrity. You repeat lies despite being debunked, in hopes you may still deceive others.

Bezos remains a far left Oligarch. The WaPo remains the most left leaning national daily in the country. Yet you lied about that as well.

Washington Post - Bias and Credibility

LEFT-CENTER BIAS These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording

mediabiasfactcheck.com

 

[ModernDiogenes]

Again, public record - Bezos is confirmed by far left Variety no less, to not be directly involved. And it's absurd to think the CEO of billion dollar enterprises get involved in day to day decisions. Yet you persist in lying - because your rage forces you to slander Trump and anyone around him.

You made a claim, it was a lie. I proved it to be a lie. Then you made the same claim again, and again.

You are a democrat, you have no integrity. You repeat lies despite being debunked, in hopes you may still deceive others.

Bezos remains a far left Oligarch. The WaPo remains the most left leaning national daily in the country. Yet you lied about that as well.

View attachment 97209

Washington Post - Bias and Credibility

LEFT-CENTER BIAS These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording

mediabiasfactcheck.com

Your plastering over with a broad brush. I was specific.

I didn’t say WaPo was suddenly conservative. I said Bezos had a thumb on the scale when he wanted it. I said he banned the editorial staff from endorsing Harris. A matter of public record. I said he has limited editorial commentary to two lanes of topics. Thus eliminating other topics.

I despite, despite Bezos claims, it was highly unlikely Bezos had no knowledge and or call on the Melanie ‘documentary”. I’m pretty sure most folks think as I do on that.

AND, you’re mistaken in your representation of the “Variety” coverage on this (or lying, but I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt). They didn’t investigate this and make any determination on its merits. They simply reported what Bezos said on the matter.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Your plastering over with a broad brush. I was specific.

You posted specific lies that I have, YET AGAIN, proven to be lies.

Will that stop you from repeating those lies? Nope, your party is too important to allow little things like honor and integrity to interfere.

I didn’t say WaPo was suddenly conservative. I said Bezos had a thumb on the scale when he wanted it. I said he banned the editorial staff from endorsing Harris. A matter of public record. I said he has limited editorial commentary to two lanes of topics. Thus eliminating other topics.

Traditionally the Post had not made such endorsements, wasn't this merely a return to traditional policy?

I despite, despite Bezos claims, it was highly unlikely Bezos had no knowledge and or call on the Melanie ‘documentary”. I’m pretty sure most folks think as I do on that.

So regardless of the facts, you persist in your lie - because HATE TWUMP.

Got it.

AND, you’re mistaken in your representation of the “Variety” coverage on this (or lying, but I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt). They didn’t investigate this and make any determination on its merits. They simply reported what Bezos said on the matter.

Again, if a publication on your side puts this out, it means they could not refute it.

Variety isn't as "conservative" as you and the Washington Post are.

 

[ModernDiogenes]

Traditionally the Post had not made such endorsements, wasn't this merely a return to traditional policy?

Bold faced lie.

Google A.I.:

• 2024: Declined to endorse a candidate, with Publisher Will Lewis announcing a permanent halt to presidential endorsements (shelving a drafted endorsement for Kamala Harris). (Added - by Bezos’ order)

• 2020: Endorsed Joe Biden (Democratic)

• 2016: Endorsed Hillary Clinton (Democratic)

• 2012: Endorsed Barack Obama (Democratic)

• 2008: Endorsed Barack Obama (Democratic)

• 2004: Endorsed John Kerry (Democratic)

All PUBLIC RECORD.

You have a problem DISCERNING fact from fiction. A very MAGA problem.