Moral relativism

[Jerry Mathers]

Paradox. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox.

of course you can.

that makes it paradox.

you always get this one wrong, dum dum.

 

[Into the Night]

It's not "me". It's not my way. It's focusing on what is important, which is not the action itself, but the result.

You are not focusing on anything.

You are locked in multiple paradoxes.
You wander from topic to topic, seemingly trying to equivocate them.
You spend your time throwing insults and mimicking.
You are trying to assign an event to a moral.

 

[Into the Night]

Okay, that is utilitarianism, or consequentialism.

'Utilitarianism' is not a word.
'Consequentialism' is not a word.

 

[Into the Night]

no argument presented. thanks faggot.

...and you deny the Bible yet again.

 

[Jerry Mathers]

Illiteracy: objective used as subjective.
Adventure is not a moral.

you are not bright.

 

[ZenMode]

Okay, that is utilitarianism, or consequentialism.

You can label it however you like, but actions have results and when you are talking about what is or isn't a moral action, you can't ignore the result.

I said before, would it be immoral to cut the clitoris off of a mannequin or statue or some other object that has no consciousness, can't feel pain, can't feel terror, etc?

 

[Jerry Mathers]

Okay, that is utilitarianism, or consequentialism.

none of which have anything to do with morality.

 

[Into the Night]

of course you can.

that makes it paradox.

you always get this one wrong, dum dum.

Trying to justify irrationality now?

 

[ZenMode]

You are not focusing on anything.

You are locked in multiple paradoxes.
You wander from topic to topic, seemingly trying to equivocate them.
You spend your time throwing insults and mimicking.
You are trying to assign an event to a moral.

Incoherent babbling.

I'm not playing your deflection/ distraction game anymore.

Ignored.

 

[Into the Night]

You can label it however you like, but actions have results and when you are talking about what is or isn't a moral action, you can't ignore the result.

An event is not a moral.

I said before, would it be immoral to cut the clitoris off of a mannequin or statue or some other object that has no consciousness, can't feel pain, can't feel terror, etc?

Depends on who you ask, and if you can find you decide to build such a statue.

 

[Hume]

You can label it however you like, but actions have results and when you are talking about what is or isn't a moral action, you can't ignore the result.

Getting clarity. You are a consequentialist in ethics.

 

[Hume]

none of which have anything to do with morality.

They are literally ethical theories.

 

[Into the Night]

Incoherent babbling.

Ignored.

Inversion fallacy. You cannot blame your problems on anybody else.

 

[Into the Night]

Getting clarity. You are a consequentialist in ethics.

'Consequentialist' is not a word.

 

[Into the Night]

They are literally ethical theories.

Ethics is not a theory. A moral is not a theory either.

 

[ZenMode]

Getting clarity. You are a consequentialist in ethics.

I am talking about morality and what is truly relevant when discussing morality.

 

[Hume]

I am talking about morality and what is truly relevant when discussing morality.

Then you do not disagree with what I said.

 

[ZenMode]

Then you do not disagree with what I said.

I am talking about morality and what is truly important as it relates to morality.

 

[Hume]

I am talking about morality and what is truly important as it relates to morality.

Yes, we both are. Where is the disagreement?

 

[ZenMode]

Yes, we both are. Where is the disagreement?

You already know where it is. We have covered it ad nauseam.

You believe morality is subjective. I believe it is objective.