Wrong.
THAT IS A FACT. You just don't like it, so you call it an opinion, yet there's nothing I said that is anything less than 100% true.
I posted the transcript of Obama's own speech.
I cut and pasted HIS OWN WORDS, unedited.
The date of M Brown's violent crime is known to all, video of it was released the day of the incident or maybe a day later, and the date of Obama's speech is written on the transcript that I linked here. It happened at least 6 weeks later.
So the fact remains that:
- Obama KNEW that M Brown was an actual violent criminal, whose fatal interaction with police occurred just moments after one of his violent crimes
- Despite the fact that Obama was fully aware that Brown was not merely some fine young gentleman who was shot for being "guilty of walking black", he chose to pretend that he was. It is a FACT that Obama KNEW that the police had every reason to be there to bring Brown in for questioning, and Obama also knew that Brown was moments removed from a fit of violent rage when the police got there.
- Obama chose to pretend that the "gentle giant, shot for walking black" narrative was the reality in that moment, and that was deceptive.
- Obama engaged in deception to further the narrative that Brown's shooting was almost certainly due to the police officer's racism. Barack Obama was aware that the narrative he was pushing was the cause of many, many violent riots.
It is a fact that Obama incited violent riots and pushed narratives that caused racial hatred and division.
Why do you think people call him the Divider-in-Chief?
If Obama didn't like the rioting, don't you think that he would have been more honest about the most likely causes of Brown's shooting? Why did Obama lie about what happened if he didn't like the rioting and the racial division?
You re not trying to debate any of the facts, or correct any errors in what I said. All you do is cry like a little girl about the fact that I'm calling Obama out for something that you know he did.