Renee Good's family sues Trump administration over fatal Minneapolis shooting

[T. A. Gardner]

So she was supposed to drive?

No. She was supposed to get out of the vehicle as ordered.

 

[Into the Night]

I am relying on the bullet hole in the windshield as evidence that he was not in directly front of the vehicle when the shot was fired.

So you are denying physics again.

IBDaMann was nice enough to provide pictures. The autopsy says she was shot in the right breast.

...and the head, and the arm.

This is simple stuff. Draw a straight line from the right side of the driver's seat through the hole in the windshield. Could the bullet have come from in front of the vehicle? Draw a straight line from the middle of the driver's seat through the hole in the windshield. Could the bullet have come from in front of the vehicle?

RQAA

 

[Into the Night]

It seems you were hit on the head repeatedly. Was Ross 3' tall with an 8' wingspan?

I see you are still trying to deny physics as well as history.

 

[Into the Night]

The officer was struck by the vehicle. That is a fact.

Not a fact. an argument. You are talking to someone that denies this.
However, video evidence and hospital records show he was struck by the vehicle.

A second officer was holding the door handle and did start to get drug by the vehicle.

Dragged. A car is not a drug. Otherwise correct.

In the less than a second that was all starting to happen, the officer in front of the vehicle had to decide on a course of action and his was to stop felony flight while using a motor vehicle as a weapon with deadly force.

...and he managed to get an excellent shot in while dodging the car. He got in two more as the car passed by him while turning to make a getaway.

All Good had to do to avoid that was obey the officers and get out of her vehicle.

Absolutely.

She resisted and then tried to run. That was 100% her mistake and it cost her her life.

Absolutely.

 

[Into the Night]

If the LEO fired that shot from beside the vehicle, and hit the window straight-on from that angle, the bullet would have gone out the passenger window you fuckin dummy. Maybe even the other side of the front window.

If a bullet went in through there and hit the driver, then the gun would have to have been IN FRONT OF THE CAR WHEN IT WAS FIRED lol. Get it?

Shoot into the window from in front of the driver, the bullet hits the window in front of the driver, then the bullet hits the driver.

He denies physics, geometry, and history.

 

[Into the Night]

This all happened in a very condensed time frame, with the car driving towards him.

He was being struck by the vehicle as he lined up that shot.

...and an excellent shot it was at that!

 

[Into the Night]

Yes. I understand the officer was violating procedure by moving in front of the vehicle and thus creating the situation he then will attempt to use to justify his actions.

Courts have ruled that officers violating proper procedures are liable for their actions.

No officer violated any procedure, Poorboy.

 

[Into the Night]

Because she didn’t. It will all come out in the trial.

She did, Phanty.

 

[Into the Night]

No it did not.

Yes it did, Phanty.

Several different angles have shown he was not struck.

He was struck, Phanty.

I don’t know what your sources are, but they are wrong.

Video, hospital records, affidavit, etc.

 

[Into the Night]

Yup.

Training requires approaching from the rear quarter panel area and giving instructions while maintaining that position.

No, it doesn't.

@T. A. Gardner keeps repeating 'but all she had to do was comply',

He is correct. All she had to do was comply.

which is NEVER justification for shooting someone.

Felony fleeing itself is justification for shooting someone. Attempting to ram a law enforcement officer is justification for shooting someone.

And as it appears from video impossible to establish any one was at any risk based on the vehicles direction of super slow travel i cannot see a jury accepting a 'fear' based reason for the shooting.

Because you deny physics, geometry, history, and the law.

When the cop loses Terry will switch to biased court and jury complaints.

Assumption of victory fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

I guess you missed the part where she turned it into felony flight, resisting arrest, drug one officer and hit another.


Like you're some kind of expert on that...

My bet is her family gets nothing.

Filing such a frivolous lawsuit should come with substantial penalties.

 

[Into the Night]

Ya you are confused or lying but feel free to time stamp video that shows otherwise.

--------------

Where the Claim Fails to Match Verified Reports and Video

• Claim: "One officer had his hand on the door handle... was pulled with the vehicle before letting go."
• The Fact: No video or official report describes an officer grabbing the handle and being pulled. In the video, as Renée Good's car begins to roll, another agent reaches through the open window to order her out, but he is not dragged or pulled along. The specific concept of an agent being "dragged 100 meters" by a car door handle belongs to a completely different case from June 2025 involving the same ICE agent (Jonathan Ross) and a different suspect.

It will never work to deny physics, geometry, hospital records, forensic records, or the video, Kewpie.

 

[Into the Night]

"They" did not.

They did, Wally.

One told her to get out of the car,

She mouthed off and willfully failed to comply.

but multiple others told her to drive away.

None.

"They" is a plural, so they told her to drive away.

Lie. Synthesis.

Killing of Renée Good - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

False authority fallacy.

According to Secretary Noem, they were traveling to their headquarters, and not about to attack the school. The reason she is ashamed of the plan to attack the school is there were no warrants for specific people. ICE just knew that there were parents dropping off children at a school with a large English as a second language program. Nothing more specific than that.

No school. No kids (fortunately!), No headquarters. Renee Good was strictly there to block law enforcement officers.

 

[Into the Night]

To detain her law enforcement needed "reasonable articulable suspicion", so it very much matters what their reasons for detaining her was. They also needed to speak with a unified command. When they were ordering her to leave, and she left, she was obeying commands.


Actually, they need a reasonable articulable suspicion to detain someone. They cannot just detain anyone for any amount of time.


Almost all the lawyers disagree with you.

Felony fleeing is not obeying commands.
Attempting to run over law enforcement officers is not obeying commands.

 

[Into the Night]

I am sure that in your world, trump is unconditionally loved. In the real world, most Americans are not seeing any of the miracles that trump promised.

You just keep up your TDS. It only helps Trump.

 

[Into the Night]

So she was supposed to drive?

RQAA

 

[Earl]

These far left loons think it’s just swell to disobey an officer’s commands and then try to run over him.

They embrace the perpetrator and vilify the police who were trying to keep everyone safe.

Loons, the whole bunch of them.

They are making themselves irrelevant with their horse mierda.

 

[BartenderElite]

These far left loons think it’s just swell to disobey an officer’s commands and then try to run over him.

They embrace the perpetrator and vilify the police who were trying to keep everyone safe.

Loons, the whole bunch of them.

They are making themselves irrelevant with their mierda.

She didn't try to run over him.

That's a false narrative. We've all seen the video.

 

[Earl]

She didn't try to run him over.

That's a false narrative. We've all seen the video.

Wrong, BE…but you usually are wrong.

 

[QP!]

These far left loons think it’s just swell to disobey an officer’s commands and then try to run over him.

They embrace the perpetrator and vilify the police who were trying to keep everyone safe.

Loons, the whole bunch of them.

They are making themselves irrelevant with their horse mierda.

You know the history of this is far deeper in the south in the 'free men' and other such 'Constitutional' citizen movements who refuse to cooperate with the law citing the absolute requirements and protections of the Constitution.

All sorts of citizens stopped and being questioned by police who refuse to cooperate one iota more than the Constitution allows.

Do i need to show you videos?