Moral relativism: open discussion

[Yakuda]

You are agreeing with a non-sequitur.

Thats your opinion and like your morals they are yours and you can force your opinion onto others

 

[Yakuda]

It is blame, not an observation. Don't try word games with me.

That I have.

I already did. DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!

An act is not a moral.

True, but your morals are your opinions. An act is nor a moral.

A chicken is not a moral.
A pig is not a moral.

"An act is not a moral"

Where has anyone but you claimed an act is a moral? You are wasting everyones time with your repeated foolishness on this

 

[Into the Night]

Thats your opinion and like your morals they are yours and you can force your opinion onto others

Logic is not an opinion.
Logic is not a moral.

 

[Into the Night]

"An act is not a moral"

Where has anyone but you claimed an act is a moral?

RQAA. DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!

You are wasting everyones time with your repeated foolishness on this

Omniscience fallacy.

 

[Yakuda]

Logic is not an opinion.
Logic is not a moral.

Thats your opinion and like your morals they are just yours

 

[Yakuda]

RQAA. DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!

Omniscience fallacy.

Nonsensical replies now.

If you have nothing new to say I'll bid you farewell on this issue.

 

[Into the Night]

Thats your opinion and like your morals they are just yours

Logic is not an opinion.
Logic is not a moral.
I did not invent logic.

 

[Into the Night]

Nonsensical replies now.

If you have nothing new to say I'll bid you farewell on this issue.

Inversion fallacy. You aren't even discussing the issue.

 

[Jerry Mathers]

Inversion fallacy. You aren't even discussing the issue.

you've become a wrecked idiotic fool.

 

[Jerry Mathers]

great thread moronic fuckface/

 

[Into the Night]

you've become a wrecked idiotic fool.

great thread moronic fuckface/

So your idea of the golden rule is to spend your time throwing insults. Lame.

 

[Jerry Mathers]

RQAA. DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!

Omniscience fallacy.

no retarded fuckstick. its just you.

 

[Jerry Mathers]

So your idea of the golden rule is to spend your time throwing insults. Lame.

I'm fine with it.

 

[ZenMode]

I don't discuss graphic details to satisfy your perversions.

I am not trying to convince any teenage girl of anything.

Some are forced into it, yes. Some do it voluntarily.

Some places don't use anesthetic, yes. Some do.

Okay. Don't describe it in graphic detail. I'm certain that you have enough grasp of the English language to talk in generalities.

For example, You could talk about the fact that you are convincing a teenage girl to do something that she can't possibly understand the long-term ramifications of. You can talk about the denial of physical please that she can never recover.

You could also talk about the possibility that the girl is being forced, against her will, to do something that she can't possibly understand the long-term ramifications of. You could also talk about the excruciating pain involved in what is being done.

Convincing a teenage girl to do something she can't possibly understand , likely using the leverage of religion and eternal punishment, is immoral in itself.

So, do you agree that there is (a) moral aspect to cutting off a teenage girl's clitoris?

New thread. Same result.

 

[Jerry Mathers]

New thread. Same result.

yes. everyone is onto ITN's pernicious toxic nature.

I mean, you and disagree on things, but we don't try to destroy language and thought in our efforts. we disagree like men and ignore each other.

 

[Yakuda]

Inversion fallacy. You aren't even discussing the issue.

Ive done nothing but while all you have offered is repeated nonsense about fallacies and acts as a moral.

 

[Into the Night]

Ive done nothing but while all you have offered is repeated nonsense about fallacies

You can't blame your fallacies on anybody else. They are your fallacies.

and acts as a moral.

You are describing yourself. It is YOU claiming an act is a moral. Inversion fallacy.

 

[Yakuda]

You can't blame your fallacies on anybody else. They are your fallacies.

You are describing yourself. It is YOU claiming an act is a moral. Inversion fallacy.

Nice try.

Where did I say, "an act is a moral"? Thats right i never did. Its you that.

An act is moral or immoral not a moral. But I'll wait for you show where I said that. I'll be waiting a while

 

[Into the Night]

Nice try.

'Nice try'?? They are YOUR fallacies. YOU made them. Only YOU can correct them.

Where did I say, "an act is a moral"? Thats right i never did. Its you that.

RQAA. DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!

An act is moral or immoral not a moral. But I'll wait for you show where I said that. I'll be waiting a while

An act is not a moral.
You just said it again.

 

[ZenMode]

I don't discuss graphic details to satisfy your perversions.

I am not trying to convince any teenage girl of anything.

Some are forced into it, yes. Some do it voluntarily.

Some places don't use anesthetic, yes. Some do.

Okay. Don't describe it in graphic detail. I'm certain that you have enough grasp of the English language to talk in generalities.

For example, You could talk about the fact that you are convincing a teenage girl to do something that she can't possibly understand the long-term ramifications of. You can talk about the denial of physical please that she can never recover.

You could also talk about the possibility that the girl is being forced, against her will, to do something that she can't possibly understand the long-term ramifications of. You could also talk about the excruciating pain involved in what is being done.

Convincing a teenage girl to do something she can't possibly understand , likely using the leverage of religion and eternal punishment, is immoral in itself.

So, do you agree that there is (a) moral aspect to cutting off a teenage girl's clitoris?

New thread. Same result.