Post your memes here! Time for some fun.

Nomad said:
I guess you're just too mentally and intellectually limited to understand the idea that in order to argue court cases in the modern world that often involve highly complex, technical scientific, medical and engineering related issues, an attorney has to study and familiarize him/herself with the very same highly complex, technical aspects which are at the heart of these matters.
Click to expand...

No they don't. They just hire experts to do that sort of thing. The lawyers can be scientific illiterates for all it matters, and they often are.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
No they don't. They just hire experts to do that sort of thing. The lawyers can be scientific illiterates for all it matters, and they often are.
Click to expand...

Lawyers need enough functional understanding to ask the right questions, cross-examine opposing experts, and translate complex concepts for judges and juries.

Lawyers who practice in technical niches—such as patent law, intellectual property, or environmental law—often hold undergraduate or advanced degrees (like a Master's or Ph.D.) in fields like chemistry, biology, or computer science.
 
Nomad said:
Lawyers need enough functional understanding to ask the right questions, cross-examine opposing experts, and translate complex concepts for judges and juries.
Click to expand...

No, they don't. They need a list of questions to ask and then read them to the witness. That is, if they're not a total 'tard.
Nomad said:
Lawyers who practice in technical niches—such as patent law, intellectual property, or environmental law—often hold undergraduate or advanced degrees (like a Master's or Ph.D.) in fields like chemistry, biology, or computer science.
Click to expand...

But that sort are more technical experts that just happen to have a law degree (much easier to get than the one in the field of expertise) too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top