A Megachurch Pastor is Running for Senate. Will Democrats & Moderate Independents Vote for Him?

Cypress

Well-known member

A Megachurch Pastor is Running for Senate. Will Democrats Vote for Him?​

As he seeks to unseat a Republican in Kansas, Adam Hamilton speaks of his work leading the state’s largest church — and making it appealing to nonreligious people.

In the race for U.S. Senate in Kansas, the Democrat quotes the Bible from memory on the campaign trail and has described voting as “an act of Christian discipleship.” He is the pastor of the largest church in the state.

His Republican opponent derides him as a “megachurch C.E.O.”

With just a few weeks until Election Day, the race appears neck and neck in a state that has sent only Republicans to the Senate since 1932.

Adam Hamilton, the Democrat seeking to unseat Senator Roger Marshall, a Republican, is a political newcomer. But Mr. Hamilton had a relatively high profile even before entering the race, thanks to his long career as a pastor at Church of the Resurrection, a Methodist congregation based outside Kansas City. Many Kansans have seen television broadcasts of his church services, read his books in their Bible studies or watched his DVD series tracing the story of Jesus’ birth.

His campaign doesn’t use the word “megachurch,” but with about 24,000 members across nine locations in Kansas, Missouri and Ohio, his church is one by any standard.

Mr. Hamilton, a former Republican who considered running as an independent, has emphasized issues like the rising costs of health care, fuel and fertilizer in his campaign. But he also speaks often of his life in the church, describing it as a role that goes beyond preaching.

He notes in his stump speech that with dozens of pastors on his church staff, there is no need for him to make the kinds of personal visits to members in crisis that are part of the job for leaders of smaller congregations.

“But I still go to the hospital, and I still go to hospices to sit with people while they’re dying,” he told voters at a campaign stop in Wichita last month. “I do it for me, because it helps my heart stay alive.”

Mr. Hamilton is part of a small but notable cluster of Protestant clergy or seminarians who are pursuing national office as Democrats this cycle. A strong showing by these candidates could remind their party that Republicans do not have a monopoly on the religious vote, said Michael Wear, the founder and president of the Center for Christianity and Public Life. Blue and purple states have many religious voters, too, and candidates who appeal to a broader swath of voters should be deployed beyond the country’s deepest red areas, he said.

“It’s one thing for Democrats to be open to a candidate like Adam Hamilton in Kansas,” Mr. Wear said. “A candidate like Adam Hamilton will probably also be really useful in more obviously competitive states.”

The group includes James Talarico, the party’s nominee for U.S. Senate in Texas, who speaks easily and often about how his faith influences his politics. Mr. Talarico is on leave from his studies at a Presbyterian seminary. A candidate for Congress in Iowa, Sarah Trone Garriott, is a Lutheran minister who still preaches several Sundays a month.


 

A Megachurch Pastor is Running for Senate. Will Democrats Vote for Him?​

As he seeks to unseat a Republican in Kansas, Adam Hamilton speaks of his work leading the state’s largest church — and making it appealing to nonreligious people.

In the race for U.S. Senate in Kansas, the Democrat quotes the Bible from memory on the campaign trail and has described voting as “an act of Christian discipleship.” He is the pastor of the largest church in the state.

His Republican opponent derides him as a “megachurch C.E.O.”

With just a few weeks until Election Day, the race appears neck and neck in a state that has sent only Republicans to the Senate since 1932.

Adam Hamilton, the Democrat seeking to unseat Senator Roger Marshall, a Republican, is a political newcomer. But Mr. Hamilton had a relatively high profile even before entering the race, thanks to his long career as a pastor at Church of the Resurrection, a Methodist congregation based outside Kansas City. Many Kansans have seen television broadcasts of his church services, read his books in their Bible studies or watched his DVD series tracing the story of Jesus’ birth.

His campaign doesn’t use the word “megachurch,” but with about 24,000 members across nine locations in Kansas, Missouri and Ohio, his church is one by any standard.

Mr. Hamilton, a former Republican who considered running as an independent, has emphasized issues like the rising costs of health care, fuel and fertilizer in his campaign. But he also speaks often of his life in the church, describing it as a role that goes beyond preaching.

He notes in his stump speech that with dozens of pastors on his church staff, there is no need for him to make the kinds of personal visits to members in crisis that are part of the job for leaders of smaller congregations.

“But I still go to the hospital, and I still go to hospices to sit with people while they’re dying,” he told voters at a campaign stop in Wichita last month. “I do it for me, because it helps my heart stay alive.”

Mr. Hamilton is part of a small but notable cluster of Protestant clergy or seminarians who are pursuing national office as Democrats this cycle. A strong showing by these candidates could remind their party that Republicans do not have a monopoly on the religious vote, said Michael Wear, the founder and president of the Center for Christianity and Public Life. Blue and purple states have many religious voters, too, and candidates who appeal to a broader swath of voters should be deployed beyond the country’s deepest red areas, he said.

“It’s one thing for Democrats to be open to a candidate like Adam Hamilton in Kansas,” Mr. Wear said. “A candidate like Adam Hamilton will probably also be really useful in more obviously competitive states.”

The group includes James Talarico, the party’s nominee for U.S. Senate in Texas, who speaks easily and often about how his faith influences his politics. Mr. Talarico is on leave from his studies at a Presbyterian seminary. A candidate for Congress in Iowa, Sarah Trone Garriott, is a Lutheran minister who still preaches several Sundays a month.


What is Adam Hamilton‘s platform? Did you look at it?
 
What is Adam Hamilton‘s platform? Did you look at it?
The biggest predictor of someone's policy preferences is their political party. It doesn't require weeks of extensive investigation.

As a prominent moderate Democrat running a statewide race he is undoubtedly pro-public education, pro-Medicaid and pro-Medicare, pro-Social Security, pro-social safety net, pro-minimum wage, pro-labor.
 
The biggest predictor of someone's policy preferences is their political party. It doesn't require weeks of extensive investigation.

So you don’t know. Hardly a surprise there.

The Democrats want universal healthcare, open borders, stack the Supreme Court, end the electoral voting process, ignoring Irans nuclear ambitions, shutting down privately run prisons, coddling criminals and criminal illegal aliens. So is Adam on board?

As a prominent moderate Democrat running a statewide race he is undoubtedly pro-public education, pro-Medicaid and pro-Medicare, pro-Social Security, pro-social safety net, pro-minimum wage, pro-labor.

That’s a bunch of meaningless drivel. I can’t say I’m surprised that you think these are policy positions.
 
So you don’t know!!
The biggest predictor of the policy preferences of a national or statewide political figure is their party affiliation.

I do not need to do weeks of extensive research to find out if he is a strong supporter of Medicaid, public schools, Social Security, Medicare, SNAP, environmental laws, and minimum wage.

Almost the only thing to consider after that is his character and integrity.
 

A Megachurch Pastor is Running for Senate. Will Democrats Vote for Him?​

As he seeks to unseat a Republican in Kansas, Adam Hamilton speaks of his work leading the state’s largest church — and making it appealing to nonreligious people.

In the race for U.S. Senate in Kansas, the Democrat quotes the Bible from memory on the campaign trail and has described voting as “an act of Christian discipleship.” He is the pastor of the largest church in the state.

His Republican opponent derides him as a “megachurch C.E.O.”

With just a few weeks until Election Day, the race appears neck and neck in a state that has sent only Republicans to the Senate since 1932.

Adam Hamilton, the Democrat seeking to unseat Senator Roger Marshall, a Republican, is a political newcomer. But Mr. Hamilton had a relatively high profile even before entering the race, thanks to his long career as a pastor at Church of the Resurrection, a Methodist congregation based outside Kansas City. Many Kansans have seen television broadcasts of his church services, read his books in their Bible studies or watched his DVD series tracing the story of Jesus’ birth.

His campaign doesn’t use the word “megachurch,” but with about 24,000 members across nine locations in Kansas, Missouri and Ohio, his church is one by any standard.

Mr. Hamilton, a former Republican who considered running as an independent, has emphasized issues like the rising costs of health care, fuel and fertilizer in his campaign. But he also speaks often of his life in the church, describing it as a role that goes beyond preaching.

He notes in his stump speech that with dozens of pastors on his church staff, there is no need for him to make the kinds of personal visits to members in crisis that are part of the job for leaders of smaller congregations.

“But I still go to the hospital, and I still go to hospices to sit with people while they’re dying,” he told voters at a campaign stop in Wichita last month. “I do it for me, because it helps my heart stay alive.”

Mr. Hamilton is part of a small but notable cluster of Protestant clergy or seminarians who are pursuing national office as Democrats this cycle. A strong showing by these candidates could remind their party that Republicans do not have a monopoly on the religious vote, said Michael Wear, the founder and president of the Center for Christianity and Public Life. Blue and purple states have many religious voters, too, and candidates who appeal to a broader swath of voters should be deployed beyond the country’s deepest red areas, he said.

“It’s one thing for Democrats to be open to a candidate like Adam Hamilton in Kansas,” Mr. Wear said. “A candidate like Adam Hamilton will probably also be really useful in more obviously competitive states.”

The group includes James Talarico, the party’s nominee for U.S. Senate in Texas, who speaks easily and often about how his faith influences his politics. Mr. Talarico is on leave from his studies at a Presbyterian seminary. A candidate for Congress in Iowa, Sarah Trone Garriott, is a Lutheran minister who still preaches several Sundays a month.


His career choice isn't what would make me vote for a person to represent what I am since conception. Religion doesn't teach equally created as genetically alive today anymore than politics honors equality cradle to grave within each generation gap and all generation gaps intellectually designed as combined ancestors living forward by heartbeats this rotation of the planet like it always has and will arrive tomorrow 7 days a week as scheduled outcomes are protected by rule of law..
 
The biggest predictor of someone's policy preferences is their political party. It doesn't require weeks of extensive investigation.

As a prominent moderate Democrat running a statewide race he is undoubtedly pro-public education, pro-Medicaid and pro-Medicare, pro-Social Security, pro-social safety net, pro-minimum wage, pro-labor.
its actually gender.
 
I bet he's pro-war and pro big pharma.

sounds like the leadership of tomorrow.

:yay:

something smellls like a whole quiver of masonic fucksticks.
Why won't you include thespians with masonic? masonic build temples to honor idealists that act larger than genetically displaced in plain sight.
 
and the world thanks you.

we need do'ers and sayers. sayers of the things that need to be said.
We need? I need people to be honest about evolving in plain sight and your "we need" is nobody dare question reality or else tyranny by mob rules democracies led by power of suggested policies to work every generation forward and dictator leaderships eliminating anyone that doesn't comply to their mindset now isn't eternity self evident results biologically here by genetic outcomes daily here never same details twice each ancestor evolving now since conception only recorded in history after date of birth charted every rotation of the planet until dead.
 
Last edited:
We need? I need people to be honest about evolving in plain sight and your "we need" is nobody dare question reality or else tyranny by mob rules democracies led by power of suggested policies to work every generation forward and dictator leaderships eliminating anyone that doesn't comply to their mindset now isn't eternity self evident results biologically here by genetic outcomes daily here never same details twice each ancestor evolving now since conception only recorded in history after date of birth charted every rotation of the planet until dead.
question reality all the way.

the Zionists are fucking up earth. hows that bitch?
 
question reality all the way.

the Zionists are fucking up earth. hows that bitch?
What makes reality different from actual time evolving as genetically added to a specific ancestral lineage and generation gap since conception as proportionately alive every heartbeat daily here?

Chromosomes define the image of the ancestor inhabiting time alive now exactly located in the longitude and latitude occupying time daily here conceived in a womb changing from a fertilized cell into the infant at birth.

DNA is the highway of changing population living series parallel current events.

Zionists is a contextually shared ideology, not chromosomes. Who are you again by social decree compared to what you been since a fertilize cell?
 
I bet he's pro-war!
Adam Hamilton, the Democratic nominee, has characterized the Iran war as a major foreign policy blunder. He has regularly highlighted its cost, which was estimated in early September to be in excess of $43 billion.

"President Trump told us last year after he dropped bombs on the nuclear facilities in Iran that we had taken care of the problem; it was buried under rubble," Hamilton said at the debate. "And suddenly this year we needed to send an armada to Iran because we were in imminent danger of nuclear weapons being developed."

He has said he would vote for a War Powers Resolution to halt military action. One such resolution failed 49-50 in the Senate last month.

 
Back
Top