She voted for Trump every time. Then came cancer and the bills

Guno צְבִי

We fight, We win, Am Yisrael Chai

McALLEN, Texas (AP) — The Ford Expedition rumbled to a stop and Cindy Banda's bedazzled flip-flops landed on the asphalt of the Houston cancer center's vast parking lot. She threaded through the rows of cars, a tally of patients who gather here to sit with chemotherapy needles or lie on radiation machines.​



The elevator dinged open. A year ago in this building, surgeons removed Banda's right breast, and she still didn't know whether treatment had expunged the cancer from her body. Doctors had told her it would be tough to beat.

"I'm more of a positive person myself," Banda said, now sitting with a white wristband in a dim waiting room. But the bills are harder to dismiss, and the single mother with six children in her care repeated something like a mantra. "Keep the house. Keep the cars. And just keep the kids stable."

She had been on sick leave from her job selling internet service for one year, and she needed the income to support her three kids and three more she had taken in after her sister's death.

The doctor said her reconstruction surgery could be scheduled early next year. "I was hoping for maybe December," Banda said, "only because I've met my deductibles." Come January, she would have to pay down the $7,500 again. Earlier may be possible, the doctor replied, if the skin around her surgical scar loosens.

Banda's first impulse was to maintain normalcy, stability, for the children.

But that requires roughly $7,000 a month for utilities, mortgage, car payments and groceries, along with the two water leaks. Then, even with insurance through her job, the surgeries, chemo and radiation added up to over $25,000 that she's been paying off, making Banda one of tens of millions of other people in the United States in medical debt.

Banda tries not to dwell on death and debt.


Turning on Trump and voting Democratic for the first time​

A lifelong Christian, Banda had voted her anti-abortion stance in past elections. When her sister was kidnapped and murdered by her ex-husband in 2020, Banda retreated from religion. The cancer brought her back to church with an apology to God, but it also made her rethink her politics.

She voted for Trump in 2016, and his first four years seemed steady, so she voted for him again in 2020. Democratic President Joe Biden's tenure, including the tail end of a global pandemic and rising inflation, felt like bedlam, so she voted for Trump to return to the White House in 2024.



But two years later and fighting an expensive disease, she had found no respite from high prices.


So when James Talarico, a Presbyterian seminary student running for U.S. Senate as a Democrat, visited one of Banda's fundraisers — speaking about his diabetes and his work in the Texas Statehouse to lower the price of insulin — it moved her. "Imagine if he can do that for the cancer," she said.

Talarico and his Republican opponent, state Attorney General Ken Paxton, have different approaches to healthcare. Talarico wants all Americans to be able to join Medicare; Paxton proposed a $25,000 tax deduction for out-of-pocket medical expenses.



Talarico also supports a law guaranteeing abortion access nationwide, which Banda has voted against for years. But after she slid into debt to stay alive, after her grocery bills mounted and the high school had to comp the kids' soccer gear she couldn't afford, Banda's anti-abortion concerns have been superseded by costs.



"Because it's what I'm living," she said. "I'm living it."

Banda cast an early ballot for Talarico. "Never voted Democrat before today!!" she wrote in a text with blue heart emoji.



 
Understand they DELIBERATELY set these cuts to take affect AFTER the midterms knowing how badly it would hurt poor magats in Red States and would cost them votes.


-------------

An estimated 22 million people ages 50 and older—including millions of low-income adults aged 60 and older—are affected by the Medicaid and health coverage changes in the 2025 budget reconciliation law known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA). [1, 2]

Key Impacts on Older Adults (Ages 60+ and pre-65)
    • Total Scope: The law cuts roughly $790 billion to over $1 trillion in federal Medicaid funding over a decade, projecting that around 10 million to 15 million people nationwide will lose Medicaid or health insurance coverage. [1, 2, 3, 4]
    • In states like West Virginia, Alaska, and Wyoming, etc, a typical 60-year-old couple can expect massive premium jumps—exceeding $10,000 to over $15,000 annually. [1, 2]
 
Understand they DELIBERATELY set these cuts to take affect AFTER the midterms knowing how badly it would hurt poor magats in Red States and would cost them votes.


-------------

An estimated 22 million people ages 50 and older—including millions of low-income adults aged 60 and older—are affected by the Medicaid and health coverage changes in the 2025 budget reconciliation law known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA). [1, 2]

Key Impacts on Older Adults (Ages 60+ and pre-65)
    • Total Scope: The law cuts roughly $790 billion to over $1 trillion in federal Medicaid funding over a decade, projecting that around 10 million to 15 million people nationwide will lose Medicaid or health insurance coverage. [1, 2, 3, 4]
    • In states like West Virginia, Alaska, and Wyoming, etc, a typical 60-year-old couple can expect massive premium jumps—exceeding $10,000 to over $15,000 annually. [1, 2]
Some of the cuts DID go into effect right away but not all.
As I have been asking since they passed the BBB just what is in it that is so bad and is going to hurt even the MAGAS that they didn't want all of it to go into effect right away.
And trying to read it and understand it takes an army of lawyers there are so many changes in it, it is a real mess.
And after the mid terms when all of it goes into effect your going to start hearing the MAGAS really cry.
From not only the cuts in Medicaid and Medicare but in SNAP and other programs that help the poor, working poor and the middle class, Just wait this is going to hurt a LOT of people and they are NOT going to like it.
But as for the MAGAS I say YOU voted for it and you got it so shut the fuck and suffer YOU have NO right to cry YOU got what you wanted.
 
OH and a LOT of MAGAS in states like AK, AL, Miss, Fla have already started crying with the cuts in Medicaid, Medicare and Snap just wait till AFTER the mid terms when the rest kicks in.
Yup, Red States and within Red States the heart of deep magat country are the ones who will suffer the most with these cuts.

so just as Trump has grifted and conned the most loyal magat base out of more of their needed money than any other group, so to is he making them pay the biggest part of the cost of the 'tax cuts for the rich'.

Trump truly hates his base and loves them too. His hate is shown in his disdain and abuse of them. His love is for how they take it and take it, and remain loyal as the poorly educated they are.
 

McALLEN, Texas (AP) — The Ford Expedition rumbled to a stop and Cindy Banda's bedazzled flip-flops landed on the asphalt of the Houston cancer center's vast parking lot. She threaded through the rows of cars, a tally of patients who gather here to sit with chemotherapy needles or lie on radiation machines.​



The elevator dinged open. A year ago in this building, surgeons removed Banda's right breast, and she still didn't know whether treatment had expunged the cancer from her body. Doctors had told her it would be tough to beat.

"I'm more of a positive person myself," Banda said, now sitting with a white wristband in a dim waiting room. But the bills are harder to dismiss, and the single mother with six children in her care repeated something like a mantra. "Keep the house. Keep the cars. And just keep the kids stable."

She had been on sick leave from her job selling internet service for one year, and she needed the income to support her three kids and three more she had taken in after her sister's death.

The doctor said her reconstruction surgery could be scheduled early next year. "I was hoping for maybe December," Banda said, "only because I've met my deductibles." Come January, she would have to pay down the $7,500 again. Earlier may be possible, the doctor replied, if the skin around her surgical scar loosens.

Banda's first impulse was to maintain normalcy, stability, for the children.

But that requires roughly $7,000 a month for utilities, mortgage, car payments and groceries, along with the two water leaks. Then, even with insurance through her job, the surgeries, chemo and radiation added up to over $25,000 that she's been paying off, making Banda one of tens of millions of other people in the United States in medical debt.

Banda tries not to dwell on death and debt.


Turning on Trump and voting Democratic for the first time​

A lifelong Christian, Banda had voted her anti-abortion stance in past elections. When her sister was kidnapped and murdered by her ex-husband in 2020, Banda retreated from religion. The cancer brought her back to church with an apology to God, but it also made her rethink her politics.

She voted for Trump in 2016, and his first four years seemed steady, so she voted for him again in 2020. Democratic President Joe Biden's tenure, including the tail end of a global pandemic and rising inflation, felt like bedlam, so she voted for Trump to return to the White House in 2024.



But two years later and fighting an expensive disease, she had found no respite from high prices.


So when James Talarico, a Presbyterian seminary student running for U.S. Senate as a Democrat, visited one of Banda's fundraisers — speaking about his diabetes and his work in the Texas Statehouse to lower the price of insulin — it moved her. "Imagine if he can do that for the cancer," she said.

Talarico and his Republican opponent, state Attorney General Ken Paxton, have different approaches to healthcare. Talarico wants all Americans to be able to join Medicare; Paxton proposed a $25,000 tax deduction for out-of-pocket medical expenses.



Talarico also supports a law guaranteeing abortion access nationwide, which Banda has voted against for years. But after she slid into debt to stay alive, after her grocery bills mounted and the high school had to comp the kids' soccer gear she couldn't afford, Banda's anti-abortion concerns have been superseded by costs.



"Because it's what I'm living," she said. "I'm living it."

Banda cast an early ballot for Talarico. "Never voted Democrat before today!!" she wrote in a text with blue heart emoji.



MY ALLAH - TWUMP gived her CANCER!!!
 
Yup, Red States and within Red States the heart of deep magat country are the ones who will suffer the most with these cuts.

so just as Trump has grifted and conned the most loyal magat base out of more of their needed money than any other group, so to is he making them pay the biggest part of the cost of the 'tax cuts for the rich'.

Trump truly hates his base and loves them too. His hate is shown in his disdain and abuse of them. His love is for how they take it and take it, and remain loyal as the poorly educated they are.
YEP they take it and take it and are so stupid they come back for more.
Then cry about it when they get hurt in the pocketbook.
Well a I said they voted for this mess and got it so they shouldn't cry about it when it bites them in the ass.
 
Understand they DELIBERATELY set these cuts to take affect AFTER the midterms knowing how badly it would hurt poor magats in Red States and would cost them votes.


-------------

An estimated 22 million people ages 50 and older—including millions of low-income adults aged 60 and older—are affected by the Medicaid and health coverage changes in the 2025 budget reconciliation law known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA). [1, 2]

Key Impacts on Older Adults (Ages 60+ and pre-65)
    • Total Scope: The law cuts roughly $790 billion to over $1 trillion in federal Medicaid funding over a decade, projecting that around 10 million to 15 million people nationwide will lose Medicaid or health insurance coverage. [1, 2, 3, 4]
    • In states like West Virginia, Alaska, and Wyoming, etc, a typical 60-year-old couple can expect massive premium jumps—exceeding $10,000 to over $15,000 annually. [1, 2]
Medicare has not been cut, Kewpie.
Stop making shit up.
 
^ this was planned and deliberate and they knew how much it would hurt magats which is why they made sure they took affect right after midterms all because the uber rich need more tax cuts to get more money.
Magats is not a word, Kewpie.
Tax cuts were for everyone, Kewpie.

Stop making shit up.
 
Some of the cuts DID go into effect right away but not all.
As I have been asking since they passed the BBB just what is in it that is so bad and is going to hurt even the MAGAS that they didn't want all of it to go into effect right away.
And trying to read it and understand it takes an army of lawyers there are so many changes in it, it is a real mess.
And after the mid terms when all of it goes into effect your going to start hearing the MAGAS really cry.
From not only the cuts in Medicaid and Medicare but in SNAP and other programs that help the poor, working poor and the middle class, Just wait this is going to hurt a LOT of people and they are NOT going to like it.
But as for the MAGAS I say YOU voted for it and you got it so shut the fuck and suffer YOU have NO right to cry YOU got what you wanted.
Medicare has not been cut, Tball.
 

McALLEN, Texas (AP) — The Ford Expedition rumbled to a stop and Cindy Banda's bedazzled flip-flops landed on the asphalt of the Houston cancer center's vast parking lot. She threaded through the rows of cars, a tally of patients who gather here to sit with chemotherapy needles or lie on radiation machines.​



The elevator dinged open. A year ago in this building, surgeons removed Banda's right breast, and she still didn't know whether treatment had expunged the cancer from her body. Doctors had told her it would be tough to beat.

"I'm more of a positive person myself," Banda said, now sitting with a white wristband in a dim waiting room. But the bills are harder to dismiss, and the single mother with six children in her care repeated something like a mantra. "Keep the house. Keep the cars. And just keep the kids stable."

She had been on sick leave from her job selling internet service for one year, and she needed the income to support her three kids and three more she had taken in after her sister's death.

The doctor said her reconstruction surgery could be scheduled early next year. "I was hoping for maybe December," Banda said, "only because I've met my deductibles." Come January, she would have to pay down the $7,500 again. Earlier may be possible, the doctor replied, if the skin around her surgical scar loosens.

Banda's first impulse was to maintain normalcy, stability, for the children.

But that requires roughly $7,000 a month for utilities, mortgage, car payments and groceries, along with the two water leaks. Then, even with insurance through her job, the surgeries, chemo and radiation added up to over $25,000 that she's been paying off, making Banda one of tens of millions of other people in the United States in medical debt.

Banda tries not to dwell on death and debt.


Turning on Trump and voting Democratic for the first time​

A lifelong Christian, Banda had voted her anti-abortion stance in past elections. When her sister was kidnapped and murdered by her ex-husband in 2020, Banda retreated from religion. The cancer brought her back to church with an apology to God, but it also made her rethink her politics.

She voted for Trump in 2016, and his first four years seemed steady, so she voted for him again in 2020. Democratic President Joe Biden's tenure, including the tail end of a global pandemic and rising inflation, felt like bedlam, so she voted for Trump to return to the White House in 2024.



But two years later and fighting an expensive disease, she had found no respite from high prices.


So when James Talarico, a Presbyterian seminary student running for U.S. Senate as a Democrat, visited one of Banda's fundraisers — speaking about his diabetes and his work in the Texas Statehouse to lower the price of insulin — it moved her. "Imagine if he can do that for the cancer," she said.

Talarico and his Republican opponent, state Attorney General Ken Paxton, have different approaches to healthcare. Talarico wants all Americans to be able to join Medicare; Paxton proposed a $25,000 tax deduction for out-of-pocket medical expenses.



Talarico also supports a law guaranteeing abortion access nationwide, which Banda has voted against for years. But after she slid into debt to stay alive, after her grocery bills mounted and the high school had to comp the kids' soccer gear she couldn't afford, Banda's anti-abortion concerns have been superseded by costs.



"Because it's what I'm living," she said. "I'm living it."

Banda cast an early ballot for Talarico. "Never voted Democrat before today!!" she wrote in a text with blue heart emoji.



So, exactly who does she get her health insurance through?
 
What if you become a billionaire? Do you want to have to pay 10% of that billion dollars to taxes? That is $100 million in taxes, so of course not. That is what Republicans sell you on.

What if you get cancer? Want to go to school? Or an of the other things you could be helped through. Then you would want those billionaire to pay some taxes. That is what the Democrats sell you on.

Now which would be worse? "Only" being worth $900 million, or dying without a penny? Which is more likely to happen? When you think of both options, Democrats become the only option.
 
insurance through her job,
So, her problem is / was that her insurance plan sucked. How would that differ from "free" universal healthcare that sucked? That is, she's paying a premium for good healthcare and that's expensive because she is seriously ill. If instead, her healthcare was free, but the treatments and availability sucked, which is the tradeoff here, would she really be better off?
 
What if you become a billionaire? Do you want to have to pay 10% of that billion dollars to taxes? That is $100 million in taxes, so of course not. That is what Republicans sell you on.

If I were a billionaire, I could choose where I lived quite freely. So, I simply choose somewhere that doesn't soak me for $100 million in taxes. Why should I pay exorbitant, even confiscatory, levels of taxes simply because I happen to be rich? The Republicans realistically see people as selfish and self absorbed to one degree or another. They don't expect people to simply be caring and generous, though they may be.
What if you get cancer? Want to go to school? Or an of the other things you could be helped through. Then you would want those billionaire to pay some taxes. That is what the Democrats sell you on.

As a billionaire, I have the economic freedom to choose where I get all those things from basically anywhere on the planet. The Democrats believe, to one degree or another, that people will automatically be altruistic and willingly help their fellow man whoever that man may be. They are shocked when people react in their own self-interests and ignore the plight of others.
Now which would be worse? "Only" being worth $900 million, or dying without a penny? Which is more likely to happen? When you think of both options, Democrats become the only option.
Which is worse? It's a choice between realistic, factual thinking (Republican) and idealistic, wishful thinking (Democrats). The latter option always has ended in ruin. History is an harsh teacher.
 
Why should I pay exorbitant, even confiscatory, levels of taxes simply because I happen to be rich?
You think 10% is exorbitant? The reason you invest in America is we have a very good return on investment, and a legal system that allows you to protect that money. That 10% tax helps protect both.
 
You think 10% is exorbitant? The reason you invest in America is we have a very good return on investment, and a legal system that allows you to protect that money. That 10% tax helps protect both.
The amount is irrelevant. The idea is that someone who is rich can see the level of taxation, whatever it is, as exorbitant. You want to try and put a number on it. I am pointing out the concept. The exact number varies with the individual. Your view is myopic at best.
 
The amount is irrelevant. The idea is that someone who is rich can see the level of taxation, whatever it is, as exorbitant. You want to try and put a number on it. I am pointing out the concept. The exact number varies with the individual. Your view is myopic at best.
Would you rather make a billion dollars and pay $100 million on it, or make zero, and pay nothing on it?
 
Back
Top