Into the Night
Contributor
She never applied for citizenship, Sybil.Pirro has been shooting blanks since Trump took her out of Fox's bar and gave her power. Omar was 12 when she came here.
She never applied for citizenship, Sybil.Pirro has been shooting blanks since Trump took her out of Fox's bar and gave her power. Omar was 12 when she came here.
She lied about her citizenship.So why are all your fellow Red Hat Club comrades getting all giddy thinking she is already guilty of something?
Cliche fallacy.Apples and Oranges,
...and...?she isn’t President,
She isn't Biden.nor caught red handed with secret document,
Yet to come.found guilty by a jury of fraud,
Possibly.she did.nor attempted to fix an election
You are describing Democrats again.And cracks anyone up how you maga are so eager to label anyone you agree with as socialist commies when it is Messiah who kisses the asses of the likes of Putin and Little Rocket Man
Yeah, yeah, yeah, we know, the Democrats invaded the Capitol, Trump didn’t steal any classified documents, Trump didn’t ask Raffensperger to dig up 11,700 votes, the Big Lie ain’t a lie, and Elvis did lunch with Sasquatch in Vegas yesterdayShe lied about her citizenship.
She lied about her name.
She lied about her marriage.
She lied about registering as a candidate.
She is involved in welfare fraud.
Cliche fallacy.
...and...?
She isn't Biden.
Yet to come.
Possibly.she did.
You are describing Democrats again.
Not with trump. They assume everything he does is illegal they just havent caught him yet.
LOL Just ignore what the person wrote, thats a great argumentYeah, yeah, yeah, we know, the Democrats invaded the Capitol, Trump didn’t steal any classified documents, Trump didn’t ask Raffensperger to dig up 11,700 votes, the Big Lie ain’t a lie, and Elvis did lunch with Sasquatch in Vegas yesterday
Got anything or is the same lame bullshit all you got
She lied about her citizenship.
She lied about her name.
She lied about her marriage.
She lied about registering as a candidate.
She is involved in welfare fraud.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, we know, the Democrats invaded the Capitol,

Trump didn’t steal any classified documents,
Trump didn’t ask Raffensperger to dig up 11,700 votes,
the Big Lie ain’t a lie, and Elvis did lunch with Sasquatch in Vegas yesterday

Got anything or is the same lame bullshit all you got
Just say under oath you never did such a thing, ever. That is easy.
No, you are not, Pretender.You are expected to do so in civil court.
Not a proof, Pretender.Just say under oath you never did such a thing, ever. That is easy.
No such conviction, Kewpie. You are hallucinating again. Put down the bong....I don't even wait.
...when you're a star, ... You can do anything
... Grab 'em by the pussy. You can do anything
And then when a women says Trump 'grabbed her by the pussy and did not wait' Yakuda is absolutely shocked that during a jury trial where the jury hears all the arguments from both sides they FIND TRUMP RAPED HER, once all considerations are in.
Cliche fallacy.What Trump did is labeling his intent and mode of operating. That IS admissible evidence for good reason. Not everything, but still good evidence.
How do you know he's a bank robber, Kewpie?Similar to if a bank robber wrote a book detailing his methods of sneaking into banks and robbing them and he was then arrested for a prior bank robbery where those means were used, those statements ALONE would not be enough to convict but they would play a great part in the evidence considered, along with the other considerations.
It's beyond his pay grade.As Trump did. A deposition is under oath. You should take an elementary level class on basic law.
Seriously.
So you're suggesting had trump said that under oath the case would have been dismissed right then and there.
...I don't even wait.
...when you're a star, ... You can do anything
... Grab 'em by the pussy. You can do anything
The Democrats were outside rioting.Yeah, yeah, yeah, we know, the Democrats invaded the Capitol,
Correct. Biden did, though.Trump didn’t steal any classified documents,
Argument from randU fallacy. Also, not a crime.Trump didn’t ask Raffensperger to dig up 11,700 votes,
What 'big lie', anchovies?the Big Lie ain’t a lie,
Hey...it's Las Vegas!and Elvis did lunch with Sasquatch in Vegas yesterday
Inversion fallacy.Got anything or is the same lame bullshit all you got
No, dummy, the prosecution determines the charges and the jury determines the verdict.The judge defines the terms in a Jury Trial. What the Jury found, That "he forcefully inserted his fingers into her vagina against her will" is commonly referred to as Rape. Do you disagree with the Judge?>
I noticed, the Kewpie Doll Boy is not a serious poster.Notice how Kewpee lies? How he changes the quotes?
Communists are liars by nature.
Again, the President as the Executive is the ultimate arbiter as to what is classified or unclassified.Actually, the Congress makes the laws, so they are the ultimate arbiter. They have given some powers to the president, but none to ex-presidents.
Stupid as usual.Nor is this forum. We can say things about people without having to have them found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.