Ilhan Omar’s Shady Castle Starts to Crumble

So why are all your fellow Red Hat Club comrades getting all giddy thinking she is already guilty of something?
She lied about her citizenship.
She lied about her name.
She lied about her marriage.
She lied about registering as a candidate.
She is involved in welfare fraud.

Apples and Oranges,
Cliche fallacy.
she isn’t President,
...and...?
nor caught red handed with secret document,
She isn't Biden.
found guilty by a jury of fraud,
Yet to come.
nor attempted to fix an election
Possibly.she did.
And cracks anyone up how you maga are so eager to label anyone you agree with as socialist commies when it is Messiah who kisses the asses of the likes of Putin and Little Rocket Man
You are describing Democrats again.
 
She lied about her citizenship.
She lied about her name.
She lied about her marriage.
She lied about registering as a candidate.
She is involved in welfare fraud.


Cliche fallacy.

...and...?

She isn't Biden.

Yet to come.

Possibly.she did.

You are describing Democrats again.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, we know, the Democrats invaded the Capitol, Trump didn’t steal any classified documents, Trump didn’t ask Raffensperger to dig up 11,700 votes, the Big Lie ain’t a lie, and Elvis did lunch with Sasquatch in Vegas yesterday

Got anything or is the same lame bullshit all you got
 
Not with trump. They assume everything he does is illegal they just havent caught him yet.

Nah, they view opposition to the party to be a "crime." The nonsense they make up is just an excuse to neutralize an enemy of the party/

democrats are Maoist/Stalinists who oppose the rule of law. Political crimes are the ONLY crimes they recognize.
 
Yeah, yeah, yeah, we know, the Democrats invaded the Capitol, Trump didn’t steal any classified documents, Trump didn’t ask Raffensperger to dig up 11,700 votes, the Big Lie ain’t a lie, and Elvis did lunch with Sasquatch in Vegas yesterday

Got anything or is the same lame bullshit all you got
LOL Just ignore what the person wrote, thats a great argument
 
Yeah, yeah, yeah, we know, the Democrats invaded the Capitol,

Indeed you have - many times. Most recently you sent men to invade the womens restrooms.

1793041108638.png

But that's (D)iffrent.

Trump didn’t steal any classified documents,

True - but Joe Biden did - and sold them to Communist China. You supported Biden engaging in espionage against America.

Trump didn’t ask Raffensperger to dig up 11,700 votes,

True, that was a blatant lie by you Communists.

You're election deniers, so you make up these sorts of lies constantly.

the Big Lie ain’t a lie, and Elvis did lunch with Sasquatch in Vegas yesterday

No doubt you believe that.

1793040966209.png

Got anything or is the same lame bullshit all you got

Your lying points are stale - long since debunked. But you lie for your party - it's your way.
 
...I don't even wait.
...when you're a star, ... You can do anything
... Grab 'em by the pussy. You can do anything


And then when a women says Trump 'grabbed her by the pussy and did not wait' Yakuda is absolutely shocked that during a jury trial where the jury hears all the arguments from both sides they FIND TRUMP RAPED HER, once all considerations are in.
No such conviction, Kewpie. You are hallucinating again. Put down the bong.
What Trump did is labeling his intent and mode of operating. That IS admissible evidence for good reason. Not everything, but still good evidence.
Cliche fallacy.
Similar to if a bank robber wrote a book detailing his methods of sneaking into banks and robbing them and he was then arrested for a prior bank robbery where those means were used, those statements ALONE would not be enough to convict but they would play a great part in the evidence considered, along with the other considerations.
How do you know he's a bank robber, Kewpie?
 
Yeah, yeah, yeah, we know, the Democrats invaded the Capitol,
The Democrats were outside rioting.
Trump didn’t steal any classified documents,
Correct. Biden did, though.
Trump didn’t ask Raffensperger to dig up 11,700 votes,
Argument from randU fallacy. Also, not a crime.
the Big Lie ain’t a lie,
What 'big lie', anchovies?
and Elvis did lunch with Sasquatch in Vegas yesterday
Hey...it's Las Vegas!
Got anything or is the same lame bullshit all you got
Inversion fallacy.
 
The judge defines the terms in a Jury Trial. What the Jury found, That "he forcefully inserted his fingers into her vagina against her will" is commonly referred to as Rape. Do you disagree with the Judge?>
No, dummy, the prosecution determines the charges and the jury determines the verdict.

There was no rape charge and no rape conviction.

I posted the verification…have a teenager explain it.

You’ve been duped again because you are a dupe.
 
Back
Top