Ilhan Omar’s Shady Castle Starts to Crumble

I'll ask you AGAIN how can I do that when the person making the claim cant even tell us when the supposed crime took place?

...I don't even wait.
...when you're a star, ... You can do anything
... Grab 'em by the pussy. You can do anything


And then when a women says Trump 'grabbed her by the pussy and did not wait' Yakuda is absolutely shocked that during a jury trial where the jury hears all the arguments from both sides they FIND TRUMP RAPED HER, once all considerations are in.

What Trump did is labeling his intent and mode of operating. That IS admissible evidence for good reason. Not everything, but still good evidence.

Similar to if a bank robber wrote a book detailing his methods of sneaking into banks and robbing them and he was then arrested for a prior bank robbery where those means were used, those statements ALONE would not be enough to convict but they would play a great part in the evidence considered, along with the other considerations.
 
N
So you're suggesting had trump said that under oath the case would have been dismissed right then and there.
Not dismissed, but it would have made it more likely he would have won, there is a reason he refused the offer to deny it.
 
...I don't even wait.
...when you're a star, ... You can do anything
... Grab 'em by the pussy. You can do anything


And then when a women says Trump 'grabbed her by the pussy and did not wait' Yakuda is absolutely shocked that during a jury trial where the jury hears all the arguments from both sides they FIND TRUMP RAPED HER, once all considerations are in.

What Trump did is labeling his intent and mode of operating. That IS admissible evidence for good reason. Not everything, but still good evidence.

Similar to if a bank robber wrote a book detailing his methods of sneaking into banks and robbing them and he was then arrested for a prior bank robbery where those means were used, those statements ALONE would not be enough to convict but they would play a great part in the evidence considered, along with the other considerations.
Irrelevant unless you can prove he actually did it. The gold digging whore couldnt even tell us what year this supposed crime took place, you shit eating donkey fucker.

On top of that the filthy shit eating donkey fuckers in NY changed the statute of limitation law temporarily just so the slut could file the case. Youre a bigger idiot that jarod
 
N

Not dismissed, but it would have made it more likely he would have won, there is a reason he refused the offer to deny it.
I doubt especially in a state where they went to the lengths of changing the law so the whore could file the case. It wasnt his responsibility to prove his innocence. The filthy whore couldnt even tell us what year this supposed rape took place
 
I doubt especially in a state where they went to the lengths of changing the law so the whore could file the case. It wasnt his responsibility to prove his innocence. The filthy whore couldnt even tell us what year this supposed rape took place
Had he done so it's much more likely he would be millions richer. Humm, he loves money so much, there must be a reason he didn't testify?
 
Irrelevant unless you can prove he actually did it. The gold digging whore couldnt even tell us what year this supposed crime took place, you shit eating donkey fucker.

On top of that the filthy shit eating donkey fuckers in NY changed the statute of limitation law temporarily just so the slut could file the case. Youre a bigger idiot that jarod
They proved it to a jury.
 
  • Like
Reactions: QP!
Irrelevant unless you can prove he actually did it. The gold digging whore couldnt even tell us what year this supposed crime took place, you shit eating donkey fucker.

On top of that the filthy shit eating donkey fuckers in NY changed the statute of limitation law temporarily just so the slut could file the case. Youre a bigger idiot that jarod
"Irrelevent" to you due to TDS.

Not irrelevant to a jury of the rest of society.

You live in your world of TDS and think the rest of us have to as well and we do not.

Trump is a rapist and legally we can all say that anywhere anytime as a jury and Judge found him to be.
 
I doubt especially in a state where they went to the lengths of changing the law so the whore could file the case. It wasnt his responsibility to prove his innocence. The filthy whore couldnt even tell us what year this supposed rape took place
I think you know thats wrong.
 
I think you know thats wrong.
Yes I do think its wrong for a state legislature to temporarily manipulate its laws so the legal system can be used to punish their political opponent. Whats funniest of all is you really dont give a shit if trump raped the whore or not you just creamed your shorts because you can call him a "rapist" but we still have no idea when it took place. The thing is if he really did rape her he would have been convicted of rape in a criminal court.
 
Just a deflection off of Trump’s fuck ups for the magas, scapegoating an outspoken Black politician always works with ths base
She did this to herself, anchovies.
As “Guno” highlighted in another tread using MTG, “how is Trump’s push on Omar going to bring gas down?”

​

It won't. Besides, gas prices are ALREADY down, anchovies. This is about federal crimes, anchovies, not gas prices.
 
Back
Top