When did he do it?The judge defines the terms in a Jury Trial. What the Jury found, That "he forcefully inserted his fingers into her vagina against her will" is commonly referred to as Rape. Do you disagree with the Judge?>
You are expected to do so in civil court.I said its the best way especially since Im not expected to prove my own guilt or innocence
I'll ask you AGAIN how can I do that when the person making the claim cant even tell us when the supposed crime took place?You are expected to do so in civil court.
Just say under oath you never did such a thing, ever. That is easy.I'll ask you AGAIN how can I do that when the person making the claim cant even tell us when the supposed crime took place?
So you're suggesting had trump said that under oath the case would have been dismissed right then and there.Just say under oath you never did such a thing, ever. That is easy.
I'll ask you AGAIN how can I do that when the person making the claim cant even tell us when the supposed crime took place?
Not dismissed, but it would have made it more likely he would have won, there is a reason he refused the offer to deny it.So you're suggesting had trump said that under oath the case would have been dismissed right then and there.
Irrelevant unless you can prove he actually did it. The gold digging whore couldnt even tell us what year this supposed crime took place, you shit eating donkey fucker....I don't even wait.
...when you're a star, ... You can do anything
... Grab 'em by the pussy. You can do anything
And then when a women says Trump 'grabbed her by the pussy and did not wait' Yakuda is absolutely shocked that during a jury trial where the jury hears all the arguments from both sides they FIND TRUMP RAPED HER, once all considerations are in.
What Trump did is labeling his intent and mode of operating. That IS admissible evidence for good reason. Not everything, but still good evidence.
Similar to if a bank robber wrote a book detailing his methods of sneaking into banks and robbing them and he was then arrested for a prior bank robbery where those means were used, those statements ALONE would not be enough to convict but they would play a great part in the evidence considered, along with the other considerations.
I doubt especially in a state where they went to the lengths of changing the law so the whore could file the case. It wasnt his responsibility to prove his innocence. The filthy whore couldnt even tell us what year this supposed rape took placeN
Not dismissed, but it would have made it more likely he would have won, there is a reason he refused the offer to deny it.
Had he done so it's much more likely he would be millions richer. Humm, he loves money so much, there must be a reason he didn't testify?I doubt especially in a state where they went to the lengths of changing the law so the whore could file the case. It wasnt his responsibility to prove his innocence. The filthy whore couldnt even tell us what year this supposed rape took place
They proved it to a jury.Irrelevant unless you can prove he actually did it. The gold digging whore couldnt even tell us what year this supposed crime took place, you shit eating donkey fucker.
On top of that the filthy shit eating donkey fuckers in NY changed the statute of limitation law temporarily just so the slut could file the case. Youre a bigger idiot that jarod
"Irrelevent" to you due to TDS.Irrelevant unless you can prove he actually did it. The gold digging whore couldnt even tell us what year this supposed crime took place, you shit eating donkey fucker.
On top of that the filthy shit eating donkey fuckers in NY changed the statute of limitation law temporarily just so the slut could file the case. Youre a bigger idiot that jarod
I think you know thats wrong.I doubt especially in a state where they went to the lengths of changing the law so the whore could file the case. It wasnt his responsibility to prove his innocence. The filthy whore couldnt even tell us what year this supposed rape took place
Sure there is but to assume you know what it is is foolish but youre a leftist so ....Had he done so it's much more likely he would be millions richer. Humm, he loves money so much, there must be a reason he didn't testify?
And? AGAIN you're suggesting truth is only found in a court room and no jury has ever gotten wrong. That makes you even more stupid than I imagined and believe me I think youre profoundly retardedThey proved it to a jury.
Yes I do think its wrong for a state legislature to temporarily manipulate its laws so the legal system can be used to punish their political opponent. Whats funniest of all is you really dont give a shit if trump raped the whore or not you just creamed your shorts because you can call him a "rapist" but we still have no idea when it took place. The thing is if he really did rape her he would have been convicted of rape in a criminal court.I think you know thats wrong.
You cannot make any evidence just disappear, Doofan.We'll see. You assholes come up empty-handed so often, I am astonished you go through these theatrics. In any case, as I said, "We'll see."
...after serving time.Heres hoping this evil witch gets deported
She did this to herself, anchovies.Just a deflection off of Trump’s fuck ups for the magas, scapegoating an outspoken Black politician always works with ths base
It won't. Besides, gas prices are ALREADY down, anchovies. This is about federal crimes, anchovies, not gas prices.As “Guno” highlighted in another tread using MTG, “how is Trump’s push on Omar going to bring gas down?”