Ilhan Omar plays the sympathy card.

T. A. Gardner

Serial Thread Killer
Seems Omar, having been raided by the FBI and under serious criminal investigation, is now playing the sympathy card with lies and half truths.

First, she's claiming she's getting "death threats." These are a serious federal crime that gets investigated (18 U.S. Code § 115) yet no such investigations have come to light. Next, she claims she's "scared" to live in Washington DC due to the FBI raid and these supposed threats.

Now, given that she's used false flag tactics in the past, such as the "attack" on her by an under flunky using a syringe of vinegar, it is almost certain her latest round of whining claims are also completely false--and in the case of the "death threats" potentially a crime in itself. But she is getting attention from the Left in the MSM over it.


 
Dumb bitch shouldn't have married her brother. She is crooked as hell.

That said, I would be very surprised if she is every prosecuted or does time in jail or is even sent back home. She surely will keep being re-elected since she represents muslime central.
 
Seems Omar, having been raided by the FBI and under serious criminal investigation, is now playing the sympathy card with lies and half truths.

First, she's claiming she's getting "death threats." These are a serious federal crime that gets investigated (18 U.S. Code § 115) yet no such investigations have come to light. Next, she claims she's "scared" to live in Washington DC due to the FBI raid and these supposed threats.

Now, given that she's used false flag tactics in the past, such as the "attack" on her by an under flunky using a syringe of vinegar, it is almost certain her latest round of whining claims are also completely false--and in the case of the "death threats" potentially a crime in itself. But she is getting attention from the Left in the MSM over it.


Kind of a nothing burger of a post.
The plot thickens.
 
Seems Omar, having been raided by the FBI and under serious criminal investigation, is now playing the sympathy card with lies and half truths.

First, she's claiming she's getting "death threats." These are a serious federal crime that gets investigated (18 U.S. Code § 115) yet no such investigations have come to light. Next, she claims she's "scared" to live in Washington DC due to the FBI raid and these supposed threats.

Now, given that she's used false flag tactics in the past, such as the "attack" on her by an under flunky using a syringe of vinegar, it is almost certain her latest round of whining claims are also completely false--and in the case of the "death threats" potentially a crime in itself. But she is getting attention from the Left in the MSM over it.


Here is a simple question for you, why now?

The DOJ always had a precedent that they didn’t go public with anything they were doing close to an upcoming election, so why now? If they had just case why wait till next month?

Answer is obvious, and says a lot about the case
 
Here is a simple question for you, why now?

The DOJ always had a precedent that they didn’t go public with anything they were doing close to an upcoming election, so why now? If they had just case why wait till next month?

Answer is obvious, and says a lot about the case
When Biden was in office, the Democrats were not about to go after one of their own. The big time Somali fraudsters in Minnesota were funneling some of their fraud money to Democrat politicians there. Same thing. The Democrats weren't going to look very hard, if at all, for fraud if it meant turning off the campaign money spigot.
 
When Biden was in office, the Democrats were not about to go after one of their own. The big time Somali fraudsters in Minnesota were funneling some of their fraud money to Democrat politicians there. Same thing. The Democrats weren't going to look very hard, if at all, for fraud if it meant turning off the campaign money spigot.
So to return to the post’s question, why now? Why is Trump breaking a DOJ precedent in airing activities so close to an election?
 
So to return to the post’s question, why now? Why is Trump breaking a DOJ precedent in airing activities so close to an election?
Are you accusing the liberal Federal Judge who approved the search warrant of bias, Anchovies?

He could have denied the search warrant.

Yes, only U.S. citizens can serve in the U.S. Congress, whether they are native-born or naturalized citizens.

Do we want non-citizens serving in Congress?
 
Are you accusing the liberal Federal Judge who approved the search warrant of bias, Anchovies?

He could have denied the search warrant.

Yes, only U.S. citizens can serve in the U.S. Congress, whether they are native-born or naturalized citizens.

Do we want non-citizens serving in Congress?
No I am asking why Trump’s DOJ is making their case publicly now breaking the DOJ’s long standing precedent of waiting till after elections? Why take it to the Judge now? If they have a case why not wait a few weeks till after the elections?

You know the answer but can’t admit it
 
No I am asking why Trump’s DOJ is making their case publicly now breaking the DOJ’s long standing precedent of waiting till after elections? Why take it to the Judge now? If they have a case why not wait a few weeks till after the elections?

You know the answer but can’t admit it
Poor anchovies. Omar's district is filled with somalis living in subsidized housing. Ballot harvesting heaven. She has a spot for life unless........
 
No I am asking why Trump’s DOJ is making their case publicly now breaking the DOJ’s long standing precedent of waiting till after elections? Why take it to the Judge now? If they have a case why not wait a few weeks till after the elections?

You know the answer but can’t admit it
I would think that the liberal Federal Judge made a decision that it was somewhat important that a non-citizen of the US not participate in making laws for actual American citizens, Anchovies.
 
Poor anchovies. Omar's district is filled with somalis living in subsidized housing. Ballot harvesting heaven. She has a spot for life unless........
Based on analyses of U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) data, research published by the Center for Immigration Studies estimates that 81 percent of Somali-headed households in Minnesota receive some form of means-tested welfare or public assistance (such as food stamps/SNAP, Medicaid, or cash welfare).

One would think that the far left loons would not want to import a group of people who can not support themselves.

It’s their tax money, too.
 
So to return to the post’s question, why now? Why is Trump breaking a DOJ precedent in airing activities so close to an election?
In this case it is one of non-government timing. The whole Somali fraud, welfare fraud, Medicare fraud, etc., was brought the public's attention by people like Nick Shirley who put it on front street. The Democrats running the states where this was going on rampantly were doing nothing about it. Trump and his administration stepped in and started charging the fraudsters. The Democrats, not wanting to look stupider than they already do, jumped on the bandwagon to at least make a visible attempt to do something about the worst of it.

Think about that. In California, the Democrat response to open fraud there was to pass a bill making it illegal for people like Nick Shirley to do independent investigation of it! How more blatant can the Democrats be than passing a bill to make fraud, which apparently is highly beneficial to them politically, impossible to detect and investigate?

That's why it is happening now. This didn't start last month. It started last year and gained momentum. Now it's an election year issue as well.
 
I would think that the liberal Federal Judge made a decision that it was somewhat important that a non-citizen of the US not participate in making laws for actual American citizens, Anchovies.
Judges have no say in when cases are brought and do not make DoJ follow their own policy, so you need to try again.
 
In this case it is one of non-government timing. The whole Somali fraud, welfare fraud, Medicare fraud, etc., was brought the public's attention by people like Nick Shirley who put it on front street. The Democrats running the states where this was going on rampantly were doing nothing about it. Trump and his administration stepped in and started charging the fraudsters. The Democrats, not wanting to look stupider than they already do, jumped on the bandwagon to at least make a visible attempt to do something about the worst of it.

Think about that. In California, the Democrat response to open fraud there was to pass a bill making it illegal for people like Nick Shirley to do independent investigation of it! How more blatant can the Democrats be than passing a bill to make fraud, which apparently is highly beneficial to them politically, impossible to detect and investigate?

That's why it is happening now. This didn't start last month. It started last year and gained momentum. Now it's an election year issue as well.
In MN Somali fraud was discovered in 2018. The attorney general and democrat governor turned their back. That was Somali run day care scam. Later to be $150 million in stolen taxpayer cash. These people are nasty.
 
Back
Top