"Impersonating another voter is a very serious crime"

Uncensored2008 said:
Sure he did Peewee.
Click to expand...
Working Without Authorization: Instead of going to school on his student visa, Musk worked on his startup, which later became Zip2. Under U.S. law, failing to maintain course enrollment invalidated his student status, and dropping out to operate a business without proper work authorization was a violation of immigration rules.
 
AProudLefty said:
Working Without Authorization: Instead of going to school on his student visa, Musk worked on his startup, which later became Zip2. Under U.S. law, failing to maintain course enrollment invalidated his student status, and dropping out to operate a business without proper work authorization was a violation of immigration rules.
Click to expand...

Sure Peewee - he married his brother too.
 
Lionfish said:

Voting Without a Traditional Address​

Yes, you can vote by providing an address where you sleep, but there are specific requirements you must meet.

To register and vote using the address where you sleep, you need to have a registered voter from your precinct vouch for you. This process involves:

  • Vouching: A registered voter must accompany you to the polling place and sign an oath confirming your address.
  • Description of Residence: You must describe where you sleep as your voting residence. This could be a specific location, such as a park or shelter.
Here are the key points to remember:

  • Registered Voter: The person vouching for you must be a registered voter in your precinct.
  • Polling Place: You will need to go to your designated polling place on Election Day.
  • Identification: While you may not need a traditional address, you might still need to provide some form of identification.
This process ensures that even those without a permanent address can participate in elections, maintaining their right to vote.
Click to expand...
:lolup:​
So you don't even bother to deny that these people still have to provide identification proving who they are, per the two sources I gave you.
 
Lionfish said:
I think we agree.
A registered voter can vouch for up to eight additional people.
Those people need to give a residential address within that precinct. A city park is accepted.
They are given a ballot, and it is counted.


I have already stated, if O'Keefe is found guilty, he should receive the maximum penalty.
Click to expand...
Both the registered voter and the person they are vouching for have to sign an oath. The majority of people are honest and don't commit crimes. The same can't be said is true of Trump or O'Keefe since both have committed crimes. If you want to get 800 illegal votes you need to find 100 registered voters to vouch for those people.
Lionfish said:
Not applicable to this conversation.

Perhaps this will help,

minnesotastatewire.com

Minnesota allows registered voters to ‘vouch’ for up to eight Election Day registrants lacking proof of residence - Minnesota State Wire

A longstanding Minnesota election law allows a registered voter to accompany up to eight people to a polling place on Election Day and "vouch" that they reside in the same precinct, enabling those individuals to register to vote even if they do not have documents proving their current address.
minnesotastatewire.com
Click to expand...
And you completely ignored the bolded part I posted which shows they both have to sign an oath. Then you ignore the fact that the person still have to present ID or their SS #. It's just the ID doesn't have to have their current address on it which is why they are being vouched for.
 
Last edited:
Uncensored2008 said:
Exposing the fraud of "vouching" for people voting - no ID with faces hidden. No idea who is voting - but that's what democrats want - election fraud is vital to gaining absolute power for the party.
Click to expand...
Except that didn't happen. WIth no ID and his face hidden, O'Keefe never actually registered to vote. O'Keefe went to multiple precincts and never once was registered. That would mean you are arguing that the system actually works.
Uncensored2008 said:
Exposing fraud and embarrassing the party led to lawfare and yet another assault on first amendment freedom of the press by the party.
Click to expand...
Exposing fraud? You mean like Trump's fraud? Or O'Keefe's fraud? Identity theft is fraud. Falsifying business records is fraud.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Except that didn't happen. WIth no ID and his face hidden, O'Keefe never actually registered to vote.
Click to expand...

Then your Gestapo prosecutor has no case and is just pulling a political stunt.

Poor Richard Saunders said:
O'Keefe went to multiple precincts and never once was registered.
Click to expand...

Then the lawfare against him is politically motivated with no basis in law.

But we all knew this already.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top