1,000 black people through giant house party in Chicago!

Western Europeans are really obnoxious, and dumb, aren't they?
Bigotry. Insult fallacy.
You behave more like the Negroids than like us.
Racism. Insult fallacy.
I can't wait until you Individualists finally replace yourselves to extinction.
How the hell do you replace yourself to extinction???
Even the Negroids aren't dumb enough to replace themselves to extinction.
Nonsense statement.
Western Europeans are the Master DisgRACE.
Bigotry. Insult fallacy.
 
You will be replaced, because your'e a dumb race.
...deleted Holy Link...
For the first time, non-Hispanic white residents now make up less than half (49.9%) of the nation’s under age 15 population, newly released 2018 U.S. Census Bureau estimates show. The new data highlight the increasing racial diversity of the nation’s overall population, for which non-Hispanic whites now comprise only slightly more than three-fifths (60.4%) of all residents.

Bigotry. Racism. Insult fallacies. False authority fallacy.
 
Bigotry. Insult fallacy.

Racism. Insult fallacy.

How the hell do you replace yourself to extinction???

Nonsense statement.

Bigotry. Insult fallacy.

You replace your culture, heritage & race to extinction, by letting in 100's of millions of Third-World riff raffs, that's how.

The bigotry, it burns, LOL
You Politically correct lunatic Individualists sure are desperate & dumb
 
Why do Western Europeans share so many traits with Africans?
They are both people. They both have two arms, two legs, a head, and a body (in most cases).
Lower cephalic index more dolichocephalic skulls.
Racism.
False authority fallacy. Attempted proof by Holy Link.
Curlier hair, which is actually more prominent than you see in this map.
Racism.
False authority fallacy. Attempted proof by Holy Link. Obviously, you can't think for yourself. You keep quoting the arguments of others as your own. Typical arrogant student.
Bigger heads, but not bigger brains, AKA thicker skulls, just like Africans do.
Racism.
False authority fallacy.
Racism. False authority fallacies.
Racism. False authority fallacy.
Racism. False authority fallacy.
Even genetic PCA plots puts you closer to Maghrebians here, which the Maghreb is North-Africa.

https://i.imgur.com/5jbkEdu.png

Racism. False authority fallacy.

A compositional error is in and of itself a fallacy. It is the extension of a property of a class across the entire class or to the class itself. When the class is people, that is called 'bigotry'. When the property being extended is a genetic trait, that is called 'racism.'.

This is a disgusting fallacy. You are rife with it. Many or your posts are filled with hatred, racism, and bigotry. You try to justify it by bringing in the arguments of other racists and bigots.
Holy Links are not God. Don't treat them as God.
In addition, you cannot use any newspaper or Wikipedia as a proof or a source with me. I will not accept them. Wikipedia has too many articles that are incomplete, biased, badly written, or just plain wrong. I do not accept any quote from Wikipedia.

The essence of philosophy is to make your OWN reasoning for your arguments, not to steal the arguments of others as your own argument. All you show by quoting others all the time is that you can't think for yourself.
 
They are both people. They both have two arms, two legs, a head, and a body (in most cases).

Racism.

False authority fallacy. Attempted proof by Holy Link.

Racism.

False authority fallacy. Attempted proof by Holy Link. Obviously, you can't think for yourself. You keep quoting the arguments of others as your own. Typical arrogant student.

Racism.

False authority fallacy.

Racism. False authority fallacies.

Racism. False authority fallacy.

Racism. False authority fallacy.


Racism. False authority fallacy.

A compositional error is in and of itself a fallacy. It is the extension of a property of a class across the entire class or to the class itself. When the class is people, that is called 'bigotry'. When the property being extended is a genetic trait, that is called 'racism.'.

This is a disgusting fallacy. You are rife with it. Many or your posts are filled with hatred, racism, and bigotry. You try to justify it by bringing in the arguments of other racists and bigots.
Holy Links are not God. Don't treat them as God.
In addition, you cannot use any newspaper or Wikipedia as a proof or a source with me. I will not accept them. Wikipedia has too many articles that are incomplete, biased, badly written, or just plain wrong. I do not accept any quote from Wikipedia.

The essence of philosophy is to make your OWN reasoning for your arguments, not to steal the arguments of others as your own argument. All you show by quoting others all the time is that you can't think for yourself.

There's no evidence for Liberal arguments on "Race"

Blaming poverty on murder & crime doesn't work.

Prince George's County, Maryland is a high murder rate, majority Black, Middle class county.

https://www.livestories.com/statist...ge's-county-homicide-assault-deaths-mortality

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_George's_County,_Maryland

Hasidim Williamsburg Brooklyn has the lowest crime in Brooklyn, but the highest poverty rates in Brooklyn.

https://patch.com/new-york/ditmaspark/map-how-crime-ridden-your-brooklyn-neighborhood

http://blogs.reuters.com/events/2013/06/07/jewish-poverty/

Asians had the highest poverty rates in NYC but low crime.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/asian-american-poverty-nyc_n_58ff7f40e4b0c46f0782a5b6

Latinos had the lowest income rates in NYC but moderate to high crime.

https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/plannin...level/nyc-population/acs/acs_socio_05_nyc.pdf

Blacks were arguably in better shape, than all 3 above, in NYC, but had very high crime rates.

See NYPD stats below for crime stats.

https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/nypd/do...planning/year-end-2019-enforcement-report.pdf
 
How do you know? Were you there to watch them form?

https://anthropology.net/2008/05/08...ence-of-americans-found-in-monte-verde-chile/

Earliest known archaeological evidence of Americans found in Monte Verde, Chile
08
Thursday
May 2008
Posted by Kambiz Kamrani in Archaeology, Blog≈ 8 Comments
TagsArchaeology, chile, monte verde, peopling of the americas, radiocarbon dating
Monte Verde, Chile is a very interesting archaeological site. First discovered in 1976, the site is about 500 miles south of Santiago and has yielded artifacts of a small settlement of 20 to 30 people living in a dozen huts along a small creek. Aside from artifacts, a wide variety of midden has also been unearthed from the site indicating these people survived on extinct species of llama, gomphotheres, shellfish, vegetables and nuts.

In 1979, Tom Dillehay conducted radiocarbon dating of the bones and charcoal found at Monte Verde. The results were shocking at the time. The dating of the organic materials was at 14,000 years before the present.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kennewick_Man

The biological diversity among ancient skulls in the Americas complicated attempts to establish how closely Kennewick Man is related to any modern Native American tribes.[16] Skulls older than 8000 years old have been found to possess greater physical diversity than those of modern Native Americans. The origin of that diversity, whether from different lineages or local adaptation, is a matter of debate.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clovis_culture

The Clovis culture is a prehistoric Paleoamerican culture, named for distinct stone tools found in close association with Pleistocene fauna at Blackwater Locality No. 1 near Clovis, New Mexico, in the 1920s and 1930s. It appears around 11,500–11,000 uncalibrated RCYBP[1] at the end of the last glacial period, and is characterized by the manufacture of "Clovis points" and distinctive bone and ivory tools. Archaeologists' most precise determinations at present suggest this radiocarbon age is equal to roughly 13,200 to 12,900 calendar years ago. Clovis people are considered to be the ancestors of most of the indigenous cultures of the Americas.[2][3][4]
 
There's only so many customers, therefor there can only be so many businesses.
There are currently 328 million people in the United States and 7.594 billion people in the world. Source: latest census information.
Derp, derp, and with so many Big Corporations now, than ever, it's becoming that much harder to start a business.
Not at all. Big corporations (the word is not a proper noun, it is not capitalized) can easily become like dinosaurs, unable to maneuver in the markets. Some little guy will come along and shoot it's kneecaps off.

Microsoft did it to IBM and DEC. It was a startup. at the time. Amazon did it to Sears. It was a startup. Dupont did it to BASF. It was a startup. The Linux consortium is doing it to Microsoft It is a coalition of programmers. Toyota is doing it to General Motors and Ford. Tesla started as a small business and created the first practical electric car that ALL the motor companies are trying to emulate.

I started and run my own business, designing and building sensors for industrial, medical, and aerospace uses. Some of them have found their way into the entertainment industry. It is successful too.
My son and a friend of his started their own business, making visual media playback systems. They are doing well, cleaning the clock on their competition, and now have some dozen employees.

Another friend of mine started a company making video games. He is becoming successful at it.
Another is a successful aircraft mechanic. He is an expert with engines and aluminum repair. A real artist.
Another started a trucking company. He covers the northwest region pretty well now.
Another started a chain of Mexican restaurants. I've eaten at one of them. It's excellent food.

All of these are corporations, with the exception of the aircraft mechanic, who operates as a sole proprietor.

You're just whining. Typical arrogant student.
 
There are currently 328 million people in the United States and 7.594 billion people in the world. Source: latest census information.

Not at all. Big corporations (the word is not a proper noun, it is not capitalized) can easily become like dinosaurs, unable to maneuver in the markets. Some little guy will come along and shoot it's kneecaps off.

Microsoft did it to IBM and DEC. It was a startup. at the time. Amazon did it to Sears. It was a startup. Dupont did it to BASF. It was a startup. The Linux consortium is doing it to Microsoft It is a coalition of programmers. Toyota is doing it to General Motors and Ford. Tesla started as a small business and created the first practical electric car that ALL the motor companies are trying to emulate.

I started and run my own business, designing and building sensors for industrial, medical, and aerospace uses. Some of them have found their way into the entertainment industry. It is successful too.
My son and a friend of his started their own business, making visual media playback systems. They are doing well, cleaning the clock on their competition, and now have some dozen employees.

Another friend of mine started a company making video games. He is becoming successful at it.
Another is a successful aircraft mechanic. He is an expert with engines and aluminum repair. A real artist.
Another started a trucking company. He covers the northwest region pretty well now.
Another started a chain of Mexican restaurants. I've eaten at one of them. It's excellent food.

All of these are corporations, with the exception of the aircraft mechanic, who operates as a sole proprietor.

You're just whining. Typical arrogant student.

Everyone simply can't be a business owner, there's only so many customers.
(Rolls eyes)

It's amazing that those who champion Capitalism the most, seem to understand Capitalism the least.
 
Of course, there's Evolution, everything supports that.
Supporting evidence is not used in science. The Theory of Evolution is not science. It is a religion. All religions are based on some initial circular argument, with arguments extending from that. The Theory of Evolution is no exception.
That doesn't mean God isn't behind Evolution.
Correct.
Just because the Bible says, doesn't mean it's legit.
So you agree with me. You asked for supporting evidence. I gave it. Science does not use supporting evidence. Only religions do that.
Scientists will laugh at you as a fool, for believing the Bible before the Scientific record.
Science is not a recording. Science is a set of falsifiable theories. It is not even people at all. Science isn't scientists.

Science is agnostic about religion. It simply doesn't go there. it doesn't care if there is a god, gods, or not.

Since scientists are Christian, Buddhist, Sikh, atheist, Hindi, Shintoists, and many others, they believe their religions.
Many scientists are Christian. They believe the Bible. That includes Galileo, Newton, Faraday, Kepler, and Descartes, by the way.
 
Supporting evidence is not used in science. The Theory of Evolution is not science. It is a religion. All religions are based on some initial circular argument, with arguments extending from that. The Theory of Evolution is no exception.

Correct.

So you agree with me. You asked for supporting evidence. I gave it. Science does not use supporting evidence. Only religions do that.

Science is not a recording. Science is a set of falsifiable theories. It is not even people at all. Science isn't scientists.

Science is agnostic about religion. It simply doesn't go there. it doesn't care if there is a god, gods, or not.

I'm pretty sure Richard Lenski's E-Coli experiments PROVED evolution.

You are just desperate, and dumb, a typical Western Protestant dunderhead.
 
Out of all people to attack in this country, you decide to attack Eastern Euros & Polaks.

Just shows how desperate, dumb, and spiteful you are.

Why do you think that is, Witold?

Joke:
Witold and his friend Jakub are walking down a road. Jakub sees Witold is carrying a sack and asks "What's in the sack, Witold"?
Witold says, "Chickens."
Jakub says "If I correctly guess how many chickens are in there, can I have one of them?"
Witold says, "Heck, Jakub, if you guess correctly then you can have both of them!"
Jakub says "Three!"
 
What percentage of Doctors & Lawyers have no patients / clients?
Like 0.1%?
Unknown. However, most in elected government positions are lawyers. They have no clients.
You Western Europeans are sure dumb, but you make up for it by being severely desperate.
Bigotry. Argument of the stone fallacy. Insult fallacy. Bulverism fallacy.
Frantically flailing around for desperate, semantics, and tiny fractions which don't fit.
I just presented a rather large fraction. Care to dispute it?
Believe me, I hate you fckers.
I know. That's what is wrong with you. You hate. Your bigotry is hate. Your racism is hate.
 
Supporting evidence is not used in science. The Theory of Evolution is not science. It is a religion. All religions are based on some initial circular argument, with arguments extending from that. The Theory of Evolution is no exception.

Correct.

So you agree with me. You asked for supporting evidence. I gave it. Science does not use supporting evidence. Only religions do that.

Science is not a recording. Science is a set of falsifiable theories. It is not even people at all. Science isn't scientists.

Science is agnostic about religion. It simply doesn't go there. it doesn't care if there is a god, gods, or not.

Since scientists are Christian, Buddhist, Sikh, atheist, Hindi, Shintoists, and many others, they believe their religions.
Many scientists are Christian. They believe the Bible. That includes Galileo, Newton, Faraday, Kepler, and Descartes, by the way.

Awesome! I never knew a true blue science denier. So what do you do to keep the COVID-19 virus away? Kill a chicken? Sacrifice a lamb?

Obviously you refuse to be given any vaccinations for anything or follow any of the recommendations of medical scientists, doctors, etc.
 
Back
Top