10 Steps To Fix What Trump Has Broken

[Tbird19482]

Inversion fallacy.
You cannot blame the economic depressions under Obama/Biden and again under Biden/Obama on Bush, Tball.

So show us a link saying we were even in a depression under Obama.
YOU have been telling this lie for OVER a year and STILL CAN NOT show any proof to back it up.
YOU are nothing but a LYING POS.

 

[Lestat Angel]

So show us a link saying we were even in a depression under Obama.
YOU have been telling this lie for OVER a year and STILL CAN NOT show any proof to back it up.
YOU are nothing but a LYING POS.

Elon fixed most of the usaid laundering. Just look at that shit for the faggotcratic laundering directly paying rioters and national enrmies.

 

[Into the Night]

Annual real GDP growth never reached 3.0% in any single year of the Obama presidency.

GDP is quite meaningless here, since it includes government spending.

The economic depression under Obama/Biden lasted nine years and saw the dollar devalued by over 50%. $2 gas becomes $4 gas. $700 gold becomes $1500 gold. A number of businesses were curtailed or even destroyed, putting people out of work, as the defaulted loans unwound.

Trump ended that depression, but the damage to the dollar was already done.

Another economic depression was started by Democrats as part of the Covid Hoax. This economic depression during Biden/Obama lasted five years and saw the dollar devalued by another 33%. Many businesses were destroyed as well, putting a lot of people out of work.

The recovery from the fanny may and freddy mac debacle started under the Clinton's was the slowest post-WWII expansion, burdened by excessive regulation, high national debt, and weak growth.

The debacle lasted far beyond the Clintons, eventually resulting in house flipping bubble that resulted in the crash. Instead of letting the loans unwind naturally, Obama interfered with it, preventing normal recovery, and causing the economic depression to last nine years.

So many bank bailouts under joebama's first two terms.

That was the interference.

Could have eased mortgages instead of putting everyone on the street who got suckered by dirtbag banks.

The mortgages were gone. The banks making these loans were left holding the empty sack. Letting the loans unwind naturally would have cause some banks to fail, but this means someone competent will buy it and possibly run it better than the last losers.

And then there was chrysler that sank.

Heh. Some would say that was not a great loss. That's also when GM became Government Motors though. Sure a long ways from the 50's Chevy's and the Big and Small block engines!

Yeah, maybe you can change your failures by posting an emoji....

Usually it's just posting insults.

 

[Lestat Angel]

Also doesn't look like snl is getting any americana subsidies this term worthless boring bastards.

 

[Into the Night]

Here' my take on Reich's superficial idiocy:

By "commandment:"

1. Why limit just the Supreme Court if you are going to do that? Let's slap term limits on Congress. Say, 3 terms for the House and 2 for the Senate. Seems fair to me. Keeps congress critters from becoming entrenched for life.

Requires a constitutional amendment. Not easy to do.

2. This one is vague. What constitutes a "conflict of interest?" Why limit this to the executive branch? Congress is the biggest violator of this one.

A good argument.

3. So, congressional review of everything a president does hum? Why not eliminate the President and just let Congress run--ruin--everything instead?

4. Independent voter redistricting commissions? Some states already have those. How are they working out? Reich is just mad that they don't draw the districts to favor his party.

States voting rights have nothing to do with federal election rules for federal elections.

5. Why restore the voting rights act? It lets the federal government meddle endlessly in state voting rights. Eliminating majority Black / Hispanic / minority voting districts cut out specifically to give some minority better chances at being elected sounds like a good idea. Let's do that!

Yeah. Racism in voting is always a good idea!

6. Media monopolies or near monopolies? There are already laws about monopolies. How about we require media to have a balance of Democrat / Republican, Leftist and Conservative journalists in every news room instead? Sort of a new "Fairness Act." That's something the Democrats want isn't it?

Question: Why is there only one monopolies commission?

7. So, if Congress does this in legislation, then what? On scientific research shouldn't be politized does that mean cutting funding for stuff like the Green / Environmentalist agenda goes away?

Science is not a research, study, or government funding.

8. Confiscate wealth? Are you nucking futs? What happens when the wealthy move or switch assets to prevent it? Inheritance taxes? Ever hear of living trusts and LLC's? Same thing different day. People will just change their way of doing stuff to avoid onerous taxes. They always have and always will.

That they do.

9. So, a few high population states are all that matter now? The compact between states to allocate their electors on the basis of the national popular vote is probably illegal. It means voters in a state that voted for candidate X in the majority but were in the minority nationally, are disenfranchised of their votes because the state is giving them to candidate Y on the basis of people's votes in other states.

Democrats want to eliminate the Electoral College and convert to electing a President by popular vote (popular election fraud?), giving many States NO say in who the President shall be. This of course requires a constitutional amendment. Don't think this will happen.

10. Good luck with that! Public financing of campaigns has never been popular. Besides it is probably illegal. Using my, your, tax dollars to support candidates and issues I or you disagree with is both illegal and immoral. Unions already lost that fight with using their dues for political purposes.

Nothing illegal about financing a campaign, unless it's tax dollars doing it. Unions lost that fight because Congress made laws against it, certainly within their authority.

 

[Into the Night]

I NEVER said it was. I said it was Obama that got us out of the DEEP recession , almost depression Bush got us into.

Inversion fallacy. You cannot blame the economic depression during Obama/Biden and again during Biden/Obama on Bush.

Obama's Final Numbers - FactCheck.org

The numbers are nearly all in now. What they show about what really happened during the eight years that Barack Obama was president is sometimes different from what politicians claimed.

www.factcheck.org

There is no such thing as a 'fact check'. Go learn what 'fact' means, Tball.

it is a FACT 10 out of the last 11 Recessions we had were started under Republican Presidents

Not a fact. Argument. Go learn what 'fact' means, Tball. It does NOT mean Universal Truth.
Inversion fallacy. You cannot blame the economic depressions under Obama/Biden or under Biden/Obama on Republican Presidents. 'Recession' is a meaningless buzzword.

were 10 of the last 11 resessions started under Republican Presidents - Bing

Intelligent search from Bing makes it easier to quickly find what you’re looking for and rewards you.

www.bing.com

Yet another quote from yet another Democrat propaganda center. 'Recession' is a meaningless buzzword.

Since World War II, the clearest tally in mainstream reporting and institutional summaries is that 11 post‑war recessions have been dated by the National Bureau of Economic Research, and 10 of those began while a Republican occupied the White House and one began under a Democrat (10 Republican, 1 Democratic) [1][

'Mainstream' is code for Democrat propaganda.
'Recession' is a meaningless buzzword.
Inversion fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

So show us a link saying we were even in a depression under Obama.
YOU have been telling this lie for OVER a year and STILL CAN NOT show any proof to back it up.
YOU are nothing but a LYING POS.

RQAA

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Nothing illegal about financing a campaign, unless it's tax dollars doing it. Unions lost that fight because Congress made laws against it, certainly within their authority.

Unions lost their ability to frivolously use dues for political causes in Beck v. Communications Workers of America. Congress later codified what the Supreme Court had already ordered into law.

Public financing of political campaigns is using tax dollars to support politicians and political causes. It is wrong and illegal because it amounts to the same thing the Supreme Court ruled on in Beck.

 

[Tbird19482]

RQAA

So show us a link saying we were even in a depression under Obama.
YOU have been telling this lie for OVER a year and STILL CAN NOT show any proof to back it up.
YOU are nothing but a LYING POS.

 

[Into the Night]

Unions lost their ability to frivolously use dues for political causes in Beck v. Communications Workers of America. Congress later codified what the Supreme Court had already ordered into law.

The Supreme Court has no authority to make law. Only Congress does.

Public financing of political campaigns is using tax dollars to support politicians and political causes. It is wrong and illegal because it amounts to the same thing the Supreme Court ruled on in Beck.

Union dues are not taxes.
However, you are correct that using tax dollars to fund campaigns is wrong and illegal (and unconstitutional, as it violates Article I, $6,9 and Article II, $2.

 

[Into the Night]

So show us a link saying we were even in a depression under Obama.
YOU have been telling this lie for OVER a year and STILL CAN NOT show any proof to back it up.
YOU are nothing but a LYING POS.

RQAA

 

[Tbird19482]

RQAA

So show us a link saying we were even in a depression under Obama.
YOU have been telling this lie for OVER a year and STILL CAN NOT show any proof to back it up.
YOU are nothing but a LYING POS.

 

[Crepitus]

Try to keep up on your own FAGGOT im too busy being ratio'd on the one site that zealously protects gay rapists, to then hand-hold turd-humping idiots as tho i should need or want to.

K thx go die.

Oh look, the tRumpling called me a faggot! Whatever shall I do?


You're such a dumbass, can't even come up with an original insult'

 

[Crepitus]

You gay rapist faggots would be a mop-head by now. World wide. The proof in that you're too fucking dumb to recognize it.

 

[Matt Dillon]

Both ex-president Joe Biden and ex-president Bill Clinton were better president, BY FAR, than that oaf now in the Oval Office.

Please provide 2 examples, because just like Stevie Wonder, I'm not seeing it.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Oh look, the tRumpling called me a faggot! Whatever shall I do?


You're such a dumbass, can't even come up with an original insult'

View attachment 96845

 

[Matt Dillon]

Biden was more of a staffer's meat puppet. He wasn't even a half way capable organized crime boss. All that those faggots were able to kill was a little ukraine girl and a guy trying to talk faggots out of being faggots.

Remember folks, faggots and biden's can only kill you if you try to talk to them


(From their bragging)
View attachment 96840

^The left cannot meme.
The "Prove Me Wrong" guy is Stephen Crowder, not Charlie Kirk.

 

[Lestat Angel]

Oh look, the tRumpling called me a faggot! Whatever shall I do?


You're such a dumbass, can't even come up with an original insult'

Oh please we both know, not only from your reaction, that ONLY being called a faggot is what bothers you most.

Fag

 

[Crepitus]

Oh please we both know, not only from your reaction, that ONLY being called a faggot is what bothers you most.

Fag

Sure kid, sure, SMH.

 

[Lestat Angel]

^The left cannot meme.
The "Prove Me Wrong" guy is Stephen Crowder, not Charlie Kirk.

For weeks into his death NAZI was all they could say about kirk. Sometimes "white supremacist." Guy was none of that and they probably still have residual programming to this effect.