19,792

archives said:
Why would they have to, and if they did, it would only be those already voting for them, especially at a free event, just like it was this week for Trump
Click to expand...

Why? Gosh, I don't know shit-for-brains! Maybe because by rallying your base is how you get elected? Some silly thing like that? Moron.

So this will be an admission that Democrats can't excite their base with their buffoonish tactics and laughably stupid agenda. Thank you.
 
archives said:
You serious?

Trump gets a free crowd close to twenty thousand, and she gets a crowd near twenty thousand who paid close to thirty dollars to get in, and you are using "sold out" as some kind of common denominator?
Click to expand...

Is Michelle running for office? Yes or no? If not, why do you stupidly think it is relevant?
 
Stretch said:
"Sure, and one you are sure to enjoy, didn't want to be accused of promoting "fake" news".............. per archives
you lose.....fake news! :laugh:
Click to expand...

I guess if one equates a crowd of twenty thousand to a free event with a similar crowd of twenty thousand to a paid event there ain't a whole lot of reasoning going on with the one doing the equating
 
archives said:
Of course he did, it was free, free in a southern city of over two and half million people with ruby red districts to the north, as I said, percentage wise, it would have more of an embarrassment if he didn't
Click to expand...

So Democrats are charging their constituents to come see them, and that is why they can't draw more than a few hundred? STFU you brain dead hack. :laugh:
 
Truth Detector said:
Is Michelle running for office? Yes or no? If not, why do you stupidly think it is relevant?
Click to expand...

Cause she got a bigger crowd to her paid events than Trump did to the free event you are getting all giddy about, and no, she ain't running, just speaking, which makes it even more embarrassing if you want to interpret crowd size as anything important
 
archives said:
Cause she got a bigger crowd to her paid events than Trump did to the free event you are getting all giddy about, and no, she ain't running, just speaking, which makes it even more embarrassing if you want to interpret crowd size as anything important
Click to expand...

That is why she and Obama are now the 1%'rs they got you all to run against. Those evil 1%'rs. They saw you all for what you are. Suckers.
 
archives said:
Cause she got a bigger crowd to her paid events than Trump did to the free event you are getting all giddy about, and no, she ain't running, just speaking, which makes it even more embarrassing if you want to interpret crowd size as anything important
Click to expand...

Are you willfully this big of a moron; or do you work at it? We are talking Presidential campaign rally's shit-for-brains. Not book events by someone who is NOT running. Apples and apples; focus dumbass. Can the Clowns on the Democratic side of the aisle draw crowds this large? It's a simple yes or no based on the FACTS asshole.
 
Truth Detector said:
LIE and LAME. What is with you liberal asshats and your propensity to lie and make shit up?

An estimated 300,000 to 600,000[1][2] people attended the public ceremony held on Friday, January 20, 2017
Click to expand...

it is true Trump paid inauguration goers like he did for his 2015 escalator ride with Melanie?
 
archives said:
Cause she got a bigger crowd to her paid events than Trump did to the free event you are getting all giddy about, and no, she ain't running, just speaking, which makes it even more embarrassing if you want to interpret crowd size as anything important
Click to expand...

Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
Why, it was free

Michelle Obama's book tour events matched or in some cases outdrew Trump's rally crowd,

"Sure, and one you are sure to enjoy, didn't want to be accused of promoting "fake" news".............. per archives
you lose.....fake news! :laugh:
 
Truth Detector said:
Are you willfully this big of a moron; or do you work at it? We are talking Presidential campaign rally's shit-for-brains. Not book events by someone who is NOT running. Apples and apples; focus dumbass. Can the Clowns on the Democratic side of the aisle draw crowds this large? It's a simple yes or no based on the FACTS asshole.
Click to expand...

Right, well if it was such a momentous event then why was it match or perhaps even bettered by an event that people had to actually pay to attend to see someone who is "NOT running"
 
archives said:
Cause she got a bigger crowd to her paid events than Trump did to the free event you are getting all giddy about, and no, she ain't running, just speaking, which makes it even more embarrassing if you want to interpret crowd size as anything important
Click to expand...
cite please
 
Stretch said:
Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
Why, it was free

Michelle Obama's book tour events matched or in some cases outdrew Trump's rally crowd,

"Sure, and one you are sure to enjoy, didn't want to be accused of promoting "fake" news".............. per archives
you lose.....fake news! :laugh:
Click to expand...

Ah, let me help you out there "stretch," the "fake" news was in reference to the source you asked for, the proof, and I gave you Murdoch's flagship, even you couldn't accuse it of "fake" in noting the size of Michelle's crowds

And the rest of your post is nonsensical
 
archives said:
Right, well if it was such a momentous event then why was it match or perhaps even bettered by an event that people had to actually pay to attend to see someone who is "NOT running"
Click to expand...
Do you believe her "rallies" will continue into the next yr.?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top