2nd Amendment right to carry openly in public affirmed

by the 9th circuit, no less.

A federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday that the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment protects a right to openly carry a gun in public for self-defense, rejecting a claim by Hawaii officials that the right only applies to guns kept at home.

The extent of the right to gun ownership protected by the Second Amendment is one of the most hotly contested debates in the United States, where life has been punctuated by a steady stream of mass shootings.

The ruling issued by a three-judge panel on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in San Francisco, came a year after the U.S. Supreme Court declined to rule either way on the carrying of guns in public.

Two of the three 9th Circuit judges voted to reverse a decision by the U.S. District Court in Hawaii that state officials did not infringe on the rights of George Young, the plaintiff, in twice denying him a permit to carry a gun outside.

“We do not take lightly the problem of gun violence,” Judge Diarmuid O’Scannlain wrote in Tuesday’s ruling. “But, for better or for worse, the Second Amendment does protect a right to carry a firearm in public for self-defense.”

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...ion=true&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter
 
More willful retards that don't really know liberals. When was the 2nd amendment on the table anyway? Seems this is just worthless blather trying to reaffirm egos.
 
I think it's silly anyone anywhere thinks anyone in power ever really wants the issue resolved. Kinda like abortion. Why would the power structure ever give up their Pavlovian control of public emotional incoherence? It's a tool they will never give up.
 
I wonder if liberals still love the Ninth Circuit.

All progressive liberals don't get the vapors over firearms.
I own a few myself.

I offered a proposal early on: Democrats should shut the fuck up over guns if Republicans will shut the fuck up over abortion.

Other than that, I stay out of the gun argument, one way or another.
 
Reading is FUNdamental, Triggered Lizard

More willful retards that don't really know liberals. When was the 2nd amendment on the table anyway? Seems this is just worthless blather trying to reaffirm egos.

by the 9th circuit, no less.

A federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday that the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment protects a right to openly carry a gun in public for self-defense, rejecting a claim by Hawaii officials that the right only applies to guns kept at home.

The extent of the right to gun ownership protected by the Second Amendment is one of the most hotly contested debates in the United States, where life has been punctuated by a steady stream of mass shootings.

The ruling issued by a three-judge panel on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in San Francisco, came a year after the U.S. Supreme Court declined to rule either way on the carrying of guns in public.

Two of the three 9th Circuit judges voted to reverse a decision by the U.S. District Court in Hawaii that state officials did not infringe on the rights of George Young, the plaintiff, in twice denying him a permit to carry a gun outside.

“We do not take lightly the problem of gun violence,” Judge Diarmuid O’Scannlain wrote in Tuesday’s ruling. “But, for better or for worse, the Second Amendment does protect a right to carry a firearm in public for self-defense.”

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...ion=true&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter

tumblr_oxtejnFq0J1wzvt9qo8_250.gif
 
All progressive liberals don't get the vapors over firearms.
I own a few myself.

I offered a proposal early on: Democrats should shut the fuck up over guns if Republicans will shut the fuck up over abortion.

Other than that, I stay out of the gun argument, one way or another.

The NRA nuts teach that liberals want the abolishment of gun rights. So they get them to believe all we liberal hunters, want this despite where we stand on guns. Just keep the friggen one man arsenal stuff out of the hands of the mentally ill. Is that so hard to compromise towards. They just give more slippery slope BS, like they give for all issues they demand a certain way on.
 
Last edited:
The NRA nuts teach that liberals want the abolishment of gun rights. So they get them to believe all we liberal hunters, want this despite where we stand on guns. Just keep the friggen one man arsenal stuff out of the hands of the mentally ill. Is that so hard to compromise to. They just give more slippery slope BS, like they give for all issues they demand a certain way on.

Think so?
 
I think it's silly anyone anywhere thinks anyone in power ever really wants the issue resolved. Kinda like abortion. Why would the power structure ever give up their Pavlovian control of public emotional incoherence? It's a tool they will never give up.

Think so? Is private gun ownership allowed in Communist or Socialist-controlled nations?
 
You might want to check into that for yourself shoog, for once. The Scadi's are quite fond of guns. And healthcare are it turns out.

How else do the Norwegian's, etc get all that reindeer sausage. I bet legion is daft enough to think they get it sourced from Santa.
 
Back
Top