4 People Died in Benghazi and Republicans had hearings for the next 4 years.

Concart said:
Who is permitting that? Do you really believe in Trumps dystopian urban landscape meme? I suppose you thought massive caravans were coming too, right? LOL at you.
Click to expand...

Wheeler Dealer and Jenny Durkin.

Missile caravans sound intriguing. Are they going to request asylum in American defense plants?
 
Bourbon said:
[h=1]We just hit 150,000 COVID-19 Deaths According to Worldometer[/h]https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

4 people died in Benghazi and Republicans had hearings for the next 4 years. That's 1 year for every person who died in the attack. The Democrats should have coronavirus hearings for the next decade at a minimum.

Also, we need criminal investigations and prosecutions.

These people need to see the inside of jail cells for what they've done to the American people.
Click to expand...

Democrats control the House. Why isn't Nancy having hearings?
 
Chaz said:
Would you say permitting people's livelihoods to be burned and looted is too nice?
Click to expand...

I was referring to politics and specifically elections.
The reason they aren't cracking down on rioters is because they're afraid of losing the black and brown vote.
 
the hearings weren't about people dying......the hearings were about why the Obama administration lied about how they died......remember when they claimed it was because of a YouTube video?......
 
StoneByStone said:
I was referring to politics and specifically elections.
The reason they aren't cracking down on rioters is because they're afraid of losing the black and brown vote.
Click to expand...

They're worried about harming white rioters because of the black and brown vote? Interesting...

Anyway, Dems haven't been particularly nice or honest about elections since they elected their first jackass in 1828.
 
Teflon Don said:
That was just priceless. You don't really believe that. You have to be trolling

Thank you so much for the laugh

When it comes to the word fascism, you use the word a lot but I don't think it means what you think it means.
Click to expand...

Voter repression ring a bell.? How about cutting people from the voting rolls? Maybe you heard of closing polling stations in black neighborhoods forcing the likely Dem voters to spend many hours in line?
 
Nordberg said:
Voter repression ring a bell.? How about cutting people from the voting rolls? Maybe you heard of closing polling stations in black neighborhoods forcing the likely Dem voters to spend many hours in line?
Click to expand...



How do republicans close polling stations in black neighborhoods run by democrats?

I can wait
 
Chaz said:
They're worried about harming white rioters because of the black and brown vote? Interesting...

Anyway, Dems haven't been particularly nice or honest about elections since they elected their first jackass in 1828.
Click to expand...

The white rioters are rioting in the name of BLM. So yeah, they're worried that cracking down on any BLM protesters would look bad. It's stupid, but there it is.

During the 19th century, the Democrats were the conservative party.
 
Hello archives,

archives said:
Bet anything it doesn’t happen

If Biden wins, he’ll focus on bringing the country back together rather than fueling further divisions, and meanwhile, Trump will be doing his best to agitate but his audience will be fading by the day till he will be where the likes of Sarah is today
Click to expand...

That would be the worst thing for our future. Yes, it is messy business, but shying away from the unpleasant never built a great nation. Biden could help it along but he may not be able to stop it. America needs closure. We must not leave that open wound to decency, to fester in our history.

We do this first, then the country can come back together. And it will set the stage for it because hatred won't just go away. It must be beaten back by doing the right thing. We need closure.The seething hatred of the extreme right needs a big fat reality check.

Their greatest idol needs to be busted.
 
StoneByStone said:
The white rioters are rioting in the name of BLM. So yeah, they're worried that cracking down on any BLM protesters would look bad. It's stupid, but there it is.

During the 19th century, the Democrats were the conservative party.
Click to expand...

Except they're just rioting because they think it advances Marxist revolution.

What was so particularly conservative about a bunch of traitors?
 
Hello Concart,

Concart said:
All of those things will go the way of Trump Airlines, Trump Steaks, Trump Wines, Trump Taj Mahal, Trump University, and Trump magazine. I can't wait to see the Trump Presidential library. Person, Man, Woman, Camera, TV. That's it.
Click to expand...

Let them have their library any way they want it. And let their be another library, hopefully not too far away, that tells a different story. The story of a president so bent on violating and defiling the powers of that office that it tested every possible means of oversight, checks or balances written into the Constitution.
 
Chaz said:
Destruction goes against Marxism?
Click to expand...

Yes. According to Marx, moving from Feudalism to Capitalism was good. The next step is Socialism, followed by the state withering away, which will finally give us Communism. At no point did he say we need to burn down all of the infrastructure and overthrow the government. Rather, we're supposed to use the government to enforce collective ownership of the means of production.

When Fox says something is "Marxist," they're using Marxism as a buzzword and ignoring its actual meaning. People to the same thing with terms like "Nazi" and "White Supremacist."
 
StoneByStone said:
Yes. According to Marx, moving from Feudalism to Capitalism was good. The next step is Socialism, followed by the state withering away, which will finally give us Communism. At no point did he say we need to burn down all of the infrastructure and overthrow the government. Rather, we're supposed to use the government to enforce collective ownership of the means of production.

When Fox says something is "Marxist," they're using Marxism as a buzzword and ignoring its actual meaning. People to the same thing with terms like "Nazi" and "White Supremacist."
Click to expand...

Marx called for violent revolution. That's why Marxist revolutions have always been violent.
 
Chaz said:
Marx called for violent revolution. That's why Marxist revolutions have always been violent.
Click to expand...

Marx believed in violence when necessary, but he didn't believe in destroying countries in order to implement Communism. And it's very debatable if many of the so-called Marxists, who ended up building Fascist states, were actually Marxist. The Bolsheviks ignored the election that voted for a Liberal Democracy and then made no effort to have collective ownership. The Bolsheviks were far closer to being Fascist than they were to being Marxist.

And really, how many of these BLM rioters do you think know anything about Marxism? They probably know less than the average Conservative.
 
StoneByStone said:
Marx believed in violence when necessary, but he didn't believe in destroying countries in order to implement Communism. And it's very debatable if many of the so-called Marxists, who ended up building Fascist states, were actually Marxist. The Bolsheviks ignored the election that voted for a Liberal Democracy and then made no effort to have collective ownership. The Bolsheviks were far closer to being Fascist than they were to being Marxist.

And really, how many of these BLM rioters do you think know anything about Marxism? They probably know less than the average Conservative.
Click to expand...

Building a fascist state and building a Marxist state are two separate affairs, even if they are both nightmares.

Just because they are ignorant, does not undo what they are working toward. How many retards wearing a Che t-shirt actually know much about the psychopath?
 
Chaz said:
Building a fascist state and building a Marxist state are two separate affairs, even if they are both nightmares.
Click to expand...

Sure, but the point is that all of the examples people use of how bad Marxism is weren't really Marxist states, they were Fascist states. Most of them even had State Capitalism. Even today's China is way more Capitalist than it is Communist.

Just because they are ignorant, does not undo what they are working toward. How many retards wearing a Che t-shirt actually know much about the psychopath?
Click to expand...

But the rioters aren't even calling themselves Marxists. They don't identify as Marxist, they're not practicing Marxism, so why should we call them Marxist?
IMO, it's just a buzzword that the Right uses to smear people and promote conspiracy theories.
 
StoneByStone said:
Sure, but the point is that all of the examples people use of how bad Marxism is weren't really Marxist states, they were Fascist states. Most of them even had State Capitalism. Even today's China is way more Capitalist than it is Communist.



But the rioters aren't even calling themselves Marxists. They don't identify as Marxist, they're not practicing Marxism, so why should we call them Marxist?
IMO, it's just a buzzword that the Right uses to smear people and promote conspiracy theories.
Click to expand...

Well, state controlled economies with state owned industries are definitely not examples of capitalism. They certainly are not closer to being capitalistic than anything else, either.

There have been BLM leaders and protestors who have self-labeled as Marxist. While some Antifa members profess anarchy, others profess Marxism.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top