5400 emails concern anyone?

[Jarod]

well yes, when her campaign started the "Russian collusion" hoax it was an attempt to win an election by fraud......but to be fair, she hid her classified documents in a closet in Colorado on a hard drive not in a bathroom......(by the way, she was never a president so she could never have declassified them)......

I understand about her having never been president, but actually she was SOS, so maybe she was actually allowed to have them. My understanding is that classified documents were emailed to her, she never asked for them or likely even knew she had them. There is no proof the "Russia hoax" was a hoax or that it came from her. You should read the Mueller report.

 

[Earl]

I understand about her having never been president, but actually she was SOS, so maybe she was actually allowed to have them. My understanding is that classified documents were emailed to her, she never asked for them or likely even knew she had them. There is no proof the "Russia hoax" was a hoax or that it came from her. You should read the Mueller report.

Nonsense.

The Federal Records Act requires agencies hold onto official communications, including all work-related emails, and government employees cannot destroy or remove relevant records.

FOIA is designed to "improve public access to agency records and information."
The NARA regulations dictate how records should be created and maintained. They stress that materials must be maintained "by the agency," that they should be "readily found" and that the records must "make possible a proper scrutiny by the Congress."
Section 1924 of Title 18 has to do with deletion and retention of classified documents. "Knowingly" removing or housing classified information at an "unauthorized location" is subject to a fine or a year in prison.
The Federal Records Act

Clinton did not use an official government email account while serving as the country's top diplomat. Instead, she used a private email account and kept all of her emails on a private server in her home. The server has been wiped clean, according to the Republican-led Benghazi committee.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

you need to stop wasting your time posting on a politics board.....there is no purpose to it when you refuse to read political news......

You should stop relying on far right news sources and start reading the actual documents released by Congress.

Or do you not understand what an original source is?

 

[Jarod]

Nonsense.

The Federal Records Act requires agencies hold onto official communications, including all work-related emails, and government employees cannot destroy or remove relevant records.

FOIA is designed to "improve public access to agency records and information."
The NARA regulations dictate how records should be created and maintained. They stress that materials must be maintained "by the agency," that they should be "readily found" and that the records must "make possible a proper scrutiny by the Congress."
Section 1924 of Title 18 has to do with deletion and retention of classified documents. "Knowingly" removing or housing classified information at an "unauthorized location" is subject to a fine or a year in prison.
The Federal Records Act

Clinton did not use an official government email account while serving as the country's top diplomat. Instead, she used a private email account and kept all of her emails on a private server in her home. The server has been wiped clean, according to the Republican-led Benghazi committee.

Again, there is no evidence she knew a few of the emails sent to her contained Classified info, and she did not cause those emails to be sent to her. Big difference than the Trump case.

 

[TOP]

You should stop relying on far right news sources and start reading the actual documents released by Congress.

Or do you not understand what an original source is?

What information is being released about the Biden's that isn't based on fact? What are you claiming not to be true about Joe's connection with Hunter?

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

What information is being released about the Biden's that isn't based on fact? What are you claiming not to be true about Joe's connection with Hunter?

The claim that Joe Biden received money in a quid pro quo is not based on facts. There is no evidence of Joe Biden getting one cent in the information that has been released. There is no evidence of members of the Biden family getting $20,000,000 since Devon Archer is not a member of the Biden family.

I have already offered to bet that no evidence will ever be presented of Joe Biden getting $20,000,000. Uncensored appears to want to not pay off after admitting he lost.

 

[TOP]

The claim that Joe Biden received money in a quid pro quo is not based on facts. There is no evidence of Joe Biden getting one cent in the information that has been released. There is no evidence of members of the Biden family getting $20,000,000 since Devon Archer is not a member of the Biden family.

I have already offered to bet that no evidence will ever be presented of Joe Biden getting $20,000,000. Uncensored appears to want to not pay off after admitting he lost.

So everything else that's been presented is true? We definitely know that he is aware of what Hunter's doing and has been involved in some way the entire time... all Hunter has to do is identify the bank accounts that belong to the Biden family member but are not specifically labeled... odd that everyone else's name is on them correct?

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

So everything else that's been presented is true? We definitely know that he is aware of what Hunter's doing and has been involved in some way the entire time... all Hunter has to do is identify the bank accounts that belong to the Biden family member but are not specifically labeled... odd that everyone else's name is on them correct?

So you jump right to a lie.
What evidence do you have of Joe Biden being involved in any way with Hunter's businesses?

 

[T. A. Gardner]

“Likely” is not a fact. LOL

There's no "likely" involved in Joe Biden having lied about having no knowledge or participation in his son's business dealings. It's 100% clear he both knew and participated. Witnesses say so. Documentation says so. Photographs say so. The evidence is overwhelming on that. Joe Biden participated. The question on the table is to what degree, and did he profit from it? What evidence is available, and it's not complete--yet--indicates that he was directly involved, and did profit from it.

That means Joe Biden was doing quid pro quo deals, taking bribes, doing shakedowns of foreign businesses and governments, as well as accepting payola from them in return for political favors.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

So everything else that's been presented is true? We definitely know that he is aware of what Hunter's doing and has been involved in some way the entire time... all Hunter has to do is identify the bank accounts that belong to the Biden family member but are not specifically labeled... odd that everyone else's name is on them correct?

Yes, everything presented to date is true because we now have multiple independent sources that corroborate that evidence. There is no question that Hunter and his business partners, along with the Biden family were involved in a massive scheme to solicit and take bribes and payola from foreign nationals, corporations, and governments in return for political favors. The money laundering scheme has been laid bare in general, and the details of individual transactions--some known already--are forthcoming as more bank records are acquired.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

The claim that Joe Biden received money in a quid pro quo is not based on facts. There is no evidence of Joe Biden getting one cent in the information that has been released. There is no evidence of members of the Biden family getting $20,000,000 since Devon Archer is not a member of the Biden family.

I have already offered to bet that no evidence will ever be presented of Joe Biden getting $20,000,000. Uncensored appears to want to not pay off after admitting he lost.

This is false. There are already both bank records, and SAR's the banks turned in that show Devon Archer received millions into accounts he owned from parties known 100% to be dealing with Hunter Biden. That money was then transferred in whole to accounts Hunter Biden or LLC's Hunter Biden had established where it was then disbursed to other Hunter Biden LLC's and then to Biden family members. That chain has been completely documented.

In other cases, it is documented in full that money from foreign nationals and corporations went to Hunter Biden owned accounts in foreign banks, then from there followed the same kind of paper trail to the Biden family.

That is all 100% true and already documented and known.

 

[Lionfish]

Sweet Jesus, the lefties here are living in denial. God bless them for their blind faith. After Brandon is forced/drops out of the race, they will then see the light.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Again, there is no evidence she knew a few of the emails sent to her contained Classified info, and she did not cause those emails to be sent to her. Big difference than the Trump case.

That the Hildabeast was doing all of her official government business on a private e-mail server she controlled was illegal in itself. That ANY classified information or documents were sent to it or through it is illegal, PERIOD. The Hildabeast was guilty of multiple federal crimes in operating that server.

On classified documents:

The person that sent them to that server is guilty of mishandling classified documents.
The person receiving them did not immediately tell officials about them is guilty of mishandling classified documents.
The person owning the server is guilty of mishandling those documents that were stored on that server.
The person owning the server is guilty of allowing copies of data on the server to be made and taken outside government control (yes, several thumb drives existed including ones the Hildabeast's lawyer turned in to the government)
That the server was hacked several times and this was not reported, adds to the severity of the crime.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Shokin was an ASSET to Burisma. He was doing nothing to investigate them. That event has been explained to you idiots, uncountable times. No quid pro quo.

What had to happen? What the fuck does that even mean?

Burisma knew he wanted to investigate them. They knew it would eventually happen. They wanted that stopped before it did. You, not I are the idiot here. Do you even know who replaced Shokin? Do you know the circumstances that were required to allow that to even happen?

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

This is false. There are already both bank records, and SAR's the banks turned in that show Devon Archer received millions into accounts he owned from parties known 100% to be dealing with Hunter Biden. That money was then transferred in whole to accounts Hunter Biden or LLC's Hunter Biden had established where it was then disbursed to other Hunter Biden LLC's and then to Biden family members. That chain has been completely documented.

In other cases, it is documented in full that money from foreign nationals and corporations went to Hunter Biden owned accounts in foreign banks, then from there followed the same kind of paper trail to the Biden family.

That is all 100% true and already documented and known.

You seem to think Joe is spelled "H", "U", "N", "T", "E", "R." It's not.

And as I have shown, since I am the only one to link to the bank records released by Congress, not one cent went to Joe Biden in those bank records. Devon Archer is not a Biden family member. Hallie Biden is not Joe Biden. Nothing I said was false. Your allegations are what is false.

If it is illegal for family members to get money then we should be looking at the $20,000,000 per year that Jared will be making for managing $2 billion in Saudi money.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

You seem to think Joe is spelled "H", "U", "N", "T", "E", "R." It's not.

And as I have shown, since I am the only one to link to the bank records released by Congress, not one cent went to Joe Biden in those bank records. Devon Archer is not a Biden family member. Hallie Biden is not Joe Biden. Nothing I said was false. Your allegations are what is false.

If it is illegal for family members to get money then we should be looking at the $20,000,000 per year that Jared will be making for managing $2 billion in Saudi money.

So far. I say in the next 6 months, there will be evidence Joe was involved and took money. Everything is pointing that way.

As for the last, a tu quoque fallacy doesn't change anything about what I just wrote.

 

[Nordberg]

So far. I say in the next 6 months, there will be evidence Joe was involved and took money. Everything is pointing that way.

As for the last, a tu quoque fallacy doesn't change anything about what I just wrote.

Another 6 months to the next sure thing. Maybe a year? Could be never. You believe because you want to. Sure thing after sure thing go up in smoke, but you will buy the next one. Is this Kraken no. 25?

 

[Lionfish]

Another 6 months to the next sure thing. Maybe a year? Could be never. You believe because you want to. Sure thing after sure thing go up in smoke, but you will buy the next one. Is this Kraken no. 25?

No Nordy, Kraken #25 is the number of times the malcontent lefties have tried to get rid of Trump.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

That the Hildabeast was doing all of her official government business on a private e-mail server she controlled was illegal in itself. That ANY classified information or documents were sent to it or through it is illegal, PERIOD. The Hildabeast was guilty of multiple federal crimes in operating that server.

On classified documents:

The person that sent them to that server is guilty of mishandling classified documents.
The person receiving them did not immediately tell officials about them is guilty of mishandling classified documents.
The person owning the server is guilty of mishandling those documents that were stored on that server.
The person owning the server is guilty of allowing copies of data on the server to be made and taken outside government control (yes, several thumb drives existed including ones the Hildabeast's lawyer turned in to the government)
That the server was hacked several times and this was not reported, adds to the severity of the crime.

ROFLMAO.
The upside down world you live sounds crazy.

It was not a crime to conduct official government business on a non government email service. There were regulations to capture such email in that anyone that did so was supposed to turn them over. Jared, Ivanka and several others used non governmental email to send government emails. I don't see you calling them criminals.

On classified documents:
The law states that the person has to knowingly or willfully perform that action to be a crime.
You have to prove the person sending them knew it was classified.
You have to prove the person receiving them knew it was classified. No documents were found that were clearly marked as classified on the server.
The person owning the server would have to know that documents were classified.
The person owning the server would have to know that the documents were classified.
No evidence was found of the server ever being hacked.

You haven't proven any crime. You have only proven you don't know the law or how the US justice system works.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

So far. I say in the next 6 months, there will be evidence Joe was involved and took money. Everything is pointing that way.

Cite one piece of evidence pointing that way. Lack of evidence is not evidence or a trend. There is no evidence anywhere of Joe Biden getting money from Ukraine. There is nothing pointing that way that is actual evidence. All we have are RW fools claiming something exists when it clearly doesn't.

As for the last, a tu quoque fallacy doesn't change anything about what I just wrote.

It proves you are hypocritical beyond belief.