And a hearty Sieg Heil to you too, geek....
You follow the moral code of Pol Pot and have the respect for law of Idi Amin...
5400 emails concern anyone?
- Thread starter Lionfish
- Start date
And a hearty Sieg Heil to you too, geek....
You follow the moral code of Pol Pot and have the respect for law of Idi Amin...
His contemporary, old man Nifty posted this:
Originally Posted by Earl View Post
Tell us more about your admiration for Mao, as you posted.
Nifty posted:
"He had only 45 million people killed.
i suppose that was a good effort,
but we need to take out 74,000,000 trumpanzees.
I'm not exactly sure of what that's the equivalent in people."
Nice people, these far left Democratic Socialist loons.
Let’s see.
The right says they have 5400 emails, but can’t produce them.
The right says $20 million went to Joe, but they can’t produce any bank records.
The right says they have whistleblowers, but they don’t seem to exist or are international arms dealers with warrants.
Is seems very much like a Trumpism. “Next week”. “In three weeks”.
LOL
The right says they have 5400 emails, but can’t produce them.
The right says $20 million went to Joe, but they can’t produce any bank records.
The right says they have whistleblowers, but they don’t seem to exist or are international arms dealers with warrants.
Is seems very much like a Trumpism. “Next week”. “In three weeks”.
LOL
"The National Archives and Records Administration has confirmed that it is in possession of nearly 5,400 emails, electronic records, and documents containing pseudonyms President Biden used as vice president.
Legal non-profit Southeastern Legal Foundation filed a Freedom of Information Act request in June 2022 for the records. Those included emails containing the names Robin Ware, Robert L. Peters and JRB Ware, pseudonyms Biden used while serving in the Obama administration, according to House Republicans investigating Hunter Biden’s overseas business dealings.
On Monday, the legal organization sued NARA to obtain the records, which it alleges could reveal that Biden shared confidential government knowledge with his son."
I expect Rep. Comer's House Committee already has them.
Legal non-profit Southeastern Legal Foundation filed a Freedom of Information Act request in June 2022 for the records. Those included emails containing the names Robin Ware, Robert L. Peters and JRB Ware, pseudonyms Biden used while serving in the Obama administration, according to House Republicans investigating Hunter Biden’s overseas business dealings.
On Monday, the legal organization sued NARA to obtain the records, which it alleges could reveal that Biden shared confidential government knowledge with his son."
I expect Rep. Comer's House Committee already has them.
Last edited:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hunter-biden-tony-bobulinski-former-business-partner-grand-jury/
dear shit stain - we have whistleblowers wiling to go under oath, what we also have is a weaponized DOJ that refused to police democrats - and you shit stains that just want to win elections.
"Weiss' decision not to bring Bobulinski is the latest indication that prosecutors investigating Hunter Biden may have avoided investigating allegations about his father, President Joe Biden."
NiftyNiblick
1960s Chick Magnet
You lowlifes can't stop playing "Jenga" with cow pies.
If piling up lots of shit were an impressive achievement, Vandy Boy,
you'd actually have a chance to become impressive.
True, and it will be the way the democrats kick him out of the 2024 race. Somehow, he will be told it is over for him, and if he resists they will have to hold a general open primary which also eliminates Heels Up Harris from the ticket. This was set up months ago when Brandon was on one of his many 'vacations' and Newsome was "visiting" the White House at that same time. I suspect obama is in this up to his fetlocks. The hard part for the democrats will be telling Bernie Sanders he will not be on the ticket. That greedy old bastard will hang on until the last minute creating more disruption. I say all this will be done by next spring, smarter people than me say it will happen in the next 60 days.
Now, If the republicans can also get Trump to throw his support to a real candidate, things could get interesting.
As another poster says,
Buckle up!
That article said nothing. Here’s your whistleblower:
“ CBS News reached out to Walker via LinkedIn, email and text message but there was no response.” Is he dead? Did Hillary kill him? LOL
derp derp goes the shit stains
Weiss refused to bring in a material witness - and is now the special prosecutor.
ROFL
You should take a night school class on the basics of criminal law.
Seriously, you are more ignorant of the most basic tenets of law than any other person on this board. You literally have zero grasp of the fundamentals of jurisprudence.
Direct witness testimony based on first-hand experience is not "hearsay," sparky.
{[FONT="]Hearsay[/FONT][FONT="] is an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of whatever it asserts, which is then offered in [/FONT]evidence[FONT="] to prove the truth of the matter. The problem with hearsay is that when the person being quoted is not present, it becomes impossible to establish credibility. As a result, hearsay evidence is generally not [/FONT]admissible[FONT="] in court. However, there are exceptions to the hearsay rule, which are explained below.}
[/FONT]hearsay | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute (cornell.edu)
Says the clown who doesn't even grasp the concept of "hearsay evidence..."
Again?
You ignored it the last 50 times.
The issues isn't evidence, it's integrity - you have none.
The OP linked the evidence of the emails - you ignored it.
You've been linked to the bank record dozens of times, you just lie and ignore.
Trump is a narcissist and would rather burn this country to the ground than throw his support behind a younger more viable candidate
"I was in the room and am testifying under oath."
You are a moron. You are dishonest and have not even a tiny bit of legal knowledge.
I'm a fucking Logistician, and know VASTLY more about the law than you.
Geeko Sportivo
Verified User
Well thank you for your professional opinion!
A lawyer who doesn't know the meaning of "hearsay?"
Totally believable...
Fake lawyer
He may not have a choice