72% want witnesses

[CFM]

Had lots of them in the House investigation.

To the point that Democrats claimed they had overwhelming proof.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Had lots of them in the House investigation.

But-but-but, Congress wants the Senate to do what they couldn't.

 

[Celticguy]

To the point that Democrats claimed they had overwhelming proof.

Exactly

 

[Jarod]

1) Trump gave the money to Ukraine.
2) He gave it within the time assigned to dispense it.
3) He gave it even though Ukraine did not investigate the Biden Burisma scandal.
4) He gave it even though Ukraine did not announce an investigation into Burisma and the Bidens
5) Ukraine did not even perceive that Trump had held up any money until Politico wrote it a month later.

An attempt at a crime is a crime. An attempt is impeachable, no matter how inept the president is. If Trump* was worried about corruption, why did he release the money?

 

[CFM]

An attempt at a crime is a crime. An attempt is impeachable, no matter how inept the president is. If Trump* was worried about corruption, why did he release the money?

Nope.

https://bongino.com/flashback-seven-times-the-gao-said-the-obama-administration-broke-federal-law/

Where were you when these 7 crimes were committed calling for impeachment?

 

[Stretch]

Had lots of them in the House investigation.

Yup. And, it was fun watching them all end up proving the case for the Reps instead of the Dims...big league boomerang. Loved it.

 

[Celticguy]

But-but-but, Congress wants the Senate to do what they couldn't.

What power does the Senate have that the house does not ?

 

[Jerry Mathers]

Wouldn't that imply the Democrats aren't aware that their motivation is political?

they haven't evolved up to awareness yet.

 

[CFM]

they haven't evolved up to awareness yet.

They're aware of what they're doing and it's definitely motivated by politics.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

What power does the Senate have that the house does not ?

Evidently Congress feels that the Senate can get the proof that they couldn't, regarding witnesses that the Congress failed to subpoena.

 

[Stretch]

The House failed to go through proper channels to "get" Bolton.

 

[Mason Melchizedek]

Are you saying the House decided to impeach without having any witnesses?

Evidence!

 

[Celticguy]

Evidently Congress feels that the Senate can get the proof that they couldn't, regarding witnesses that the Congress failed to subpoena.

By magic ?
Exec privilege applies equally.

 

[Mason Melchizedek]

What power does the Senate have that the house does not ?

The power to convict the guilty piece of shit!

 

[USFREEDOM911]

The power to convict the guilty piece of shit!

INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY

 

[countryboy]

The power to convict the guilty piece of shit!

Entry #2,347 of the Vapid Responses Handbook, Revised Edition.

 

[Celticguy]

The power to convict the guilty piece of shit!

Or not but to stay on topic (as the rules here require) they are no different as regards executive privilege.

 

[Grokmaster]

What power does the Senate have that the house does not ?

To try the impeachment case; ratify treaties; approve all Exec. Branch appointments..(incl. and esp. judicial) , etc.

 

[CFM]

Evidence!

The Democrats claim they have overwhelming evidence. Wouldn't that mean they already called witnesses during the inquiry?

 

[Walt]

How about Old Joe and No Experience Hunter?

Remember Bush put Hunter Biden on the Board of Directors of Amtrak. He has a lot more experience with international business than trump does.