you're right......go stand by that wall......we've decided to end yours......
who cares what you decided internet tough guy

you're right......go stand by that wall......we've decided to end yours......

No, it simply means you have been obstinate on these same talking points for a very long time now. Age does not reduce the argument of stone fallacy that you are making.
You are not discussing biology. You are discussing a definition of 'life'. Just because biologists have an opinion does not make it biology.
That they do, but science isn't involved in deciding the definition of 'life', oddly enough.
Quote Originally Posted by Gonzomin View Post
If you could remove a beginning fetus and insert it in a Christian's body, then you could argue it.
who cares what you decided internet tough guy![]()
you just wrecked your argument as a fertilized egg also isn't guaranteed to grow into a child.
compared to both the fetus and the birthed child, you remain the lesser......You acknowledged that this life isn't a child. It is something lesser. How much lesser is the question?
doctors slap babies when they are born................
???.....I'm not an internet tough guy......I'm just your intellectual and moral superior.......
it is certainly guaranteed not to grow into anything else EXCEPT a child......
compared to both the fetus and the birthed child, you remain the lesser......
30 percent grow into miscarriages. They are not life. many are born dead. Some are born without brains or spines. 120,000 babies a year have serious birth defects. Many do not survive and some that do are in terrible shape.
I'm just a blob of unthinking cells
Yes, yet so many on the left continue to pretend it isn't human, in order to justify ending its life. Saying it has nothing to do with abortion when it comes up constantly from idiots on the left is absurd.
Inversion fallacy. This is what YOU are doing. Science is simply a set of falsifiable theories. No more, no less.Once again the board idiot rushes in to proclaim what does and doesn't have to do with science.
No.Let me guess, you are going to start making up definitions again?
Which is why it has nothing to do with science.You are correct though, this isn't about a theory.
There is no such thing. Science is not 'fact'. 'Fact' does not mean Universal Truth. There is nothing genetic about any fact. Redefinition fallacies.It is a scientific genetic fact.
Sorry, pervert. It doesn't matter how much you baby killers sugar coat it, abortion is murder and Roe v Wade needs to go away.Nobody is denying a human embryo is a human embryo. Read Roe, they discuss all the important aspects in concluding upon a location to
state when a "person" vested with rights such that the state has a compelling interest to regulate and protect against the countervailing right to
privacy, which they acknowledged and protected also, and that included biological facts, historical treatment of the subject, religion in history
and criminal law.
I bet if righttard moron ACTUALLY BOTHERED TO READ ROE V WADE, they'd realize what a well thought out treatise it indeed is.
and yet Roe v Wade was so well thought out. lolits just a blob of unthinking cells