97/72/43 - Approval numbers of the SOTU speech.

Bigdog said:
His tweeting and transparency ... got him elected to the highest office in the land.

If his name was Joe Biden ... the Left would just giggle about his tweets and call it a gaffe.
Click to expand...

People don't like his tweets; because it bypasses the ability of the MSM to put their spin on what they want people to believe he did, before they can put their spin on it and tell everyone what they want people to believe he said.

:truestory:
 
Thing1 said:
Joy Reid doesn't speak for liberals everywhere.

It's such a lazy thing to say "liberals hate America." There are military people & intel operatives who are liberal who put their lives on the line all of the time for America. There are liberals who commit their entire lives to improving other lives in America.

Liberals didn't run on a slogan that America wasn't great.
Click to expand...

But even liberals don't believe that those you mentioned are TRUE LIBERALS and the left only wants to use them as "tokens", to be paraded around in an effort to get the public to believe that liberals really stand for those things.
 
J Craft said:
Yes, and if he had never tweeted the media would have destroyed him. Like I said, he's damned if he does he's damned if he don't. The liberal media proved without a shadow of a doubt during the Bush years they don't behave towards a conservative president as they demand we behave towards a liberal one.

Their hypocrisy knows no bounds. If it weren't for a double standard, liberals would have no standard at all.
Click to expand...

EXACTLY!!

When's the last time you heard a liberal mention or even refer to Cindy Sheehan!
<rhetorical question>

:facepalm:
 
Right said:
No, you misinterpret. Link up to the exact quote that you are claiming and I'll illustrate how.
Click to expand...

Your games are pretty boring. Spicer said it in a news conference - I'm sure you're familiar w/ it, and forgot it in the context of this discussion. You follow politics closely enough where you know that's what he said, though.

I'm not interested in your spin on it, but explain it however you want. Pretty minor point overall. I don't much care - you had asked why anyone would care about tweets, and that's certainly a reason.
 
Thing1 said:
Your games are pretty boring. Spicer said it in a news conference - I'm sure you're familiar w/ it, and forgot it in the context of this discussion. You follow politics closely enough where you know that's what he said, though.

I'm not interested in your spin on it, but explain it however you want. Pretty minor point overall. I don't much care - you had asked why anyone would care about tweets, and that's certainly a reason.
Click to expand...

Spicer doesn't set White House policy.
 
Right said:
Spicer doesn't set White House policy.
Click to expand...

That's it? That's your cover?

He was spokesman for the WH. So, you're essentially saying he lied. Regardless, when the spokesman for the WH says that they're official statements, it's logical to conclude that they would draw some interest from the populace.
 
Thing1 said:
That's it? That's your cover?

He was spokesman for the WH. So, you're essentially saying he lied. Regardless, when the spokesman for the WH says that they're official statements, it's logical to conclude that they would draw some interest from the populace.
Click to expand...

He didn't lie; he was simply incorrect. Jumping on the "lie" thing is very unbecoming. Probably one of the reasons Grind dedicated an emoton just to you.

:thing1:
 
Superfreak said:
AND AGAIN... your 'fact checks' did not check what HE SAID. They spun it into something else and then rated it 'false'. That is the problem with your 'fact checkers'. They are blatantly misrepresenting what he said.

They did the same damn thing with the third one....""Our massive tax cuts provide tremendous relief for the middle class and small businesses."
The tax bill does benefit Americans with modest incomes initially, but the wealthy take a disproportionate share."

Look at what Trump stated. It is 100% true. he did not state what proportion they got, just that they would benefit greatly. Which they will. The so-called fact checker then distorted the comment into some proportionate argument.

Bottom line... your 'fact checkers' blatantly twisted what was said into completely different discussions so that they could proclaim trump 'false'
Click to expand...

1. Quote exactly what he said about tax cuts that differs from what I posted. His own words.

2. You're ignoring the other half-truths and falsehoods, why is that?

3. trump also stated his SOTU had the largest number of watchers in history. Another big fat lie. Explain that.
https://twitter.com/x/status/959034299222843394


But according to the numbers, that's simply not true.


According to Nielsen, 45.6 million people watched Trump give his address on Tuesday. That's significantly less than the 51.7 million viewers President George W. Bush enjoyed for his first State of the Union in 2002, and the 62 million viewers he garnered for his second. And it's less than the 48 million people who watched Barack Obama’s first State of the Union eight years ago.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/do...nion-had-largest-viewership-history-s-n843661

​
 
Royal Highness said:
my post was almost a direct quote from msnbc host joy reid, who made it explicit she's against the values of church, family, police, miliary and the national anthem. Liberals are anti-american and always have been. They hate capitalism, they hate free speech, they hate white people.
Click to expand...

^ The above is just one example of the hyperbole that undercuts your boastful claim to being one of the most influential political thinkers and deep-level theorists in the modern era.
 
Bigdog said:
His tweeting and transparency ... got him elected to the highest office in the land.

If his name was Joe Biden ... the Left would just giggle about his tweets and call it a gaffe.
Click to expand...

Transparency? I'll take that under consideration after he releases his tax forms.
 
christiefan915 said:
^ The above is just one example of the hyperbole that undercuts your boastful claim to being one of the most influential political thinkers and deep-level theorists in the modern era.
Click to expand...

christie you are so retarded for you to even begin to grasp the intricacies of my deep level analysis would be like a monkey trying to understand calculus. Go sit in the corner, dummy. :shamecube:
 
Royal Highness said:
christie you are so retarded for you to even begin to grasp the intricacies of my deep level analysis would be like a monkey trying to understand calculus. Go sit in the corner, dummy. :shamecube:
Click to expand...

Your claim that liberals hate America, coupled with your unquestioning acceptance of every screwball conspiracy theory out there, tells me just how shallow your so-called analysis is.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top