A 9-year-old boy shot his older sister to death over a video game controller, sheriff

SmarterthanYou said:
can you copy and paste that part of the decision, please? thanks.
Click to expand...

Heller v DC

1. The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. Pp. 2–53.

... ramblings about precedent and historical connotation

2. Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons. Pp. 54–56.
 
BodyDouble said:
Aah! The old, "I now strongly suspect I am talking to a fake sfotware progran." <<<(I C&P'd that even though you spelled software and program wrong.) Didn't you say something like Russian bot earlier? And the gibberish you posted before I didn't even bother to respond to as it looked like gibberish to me and I don't deal with gibberish. I deal in facts and you deal in maybe's and might be's. If you want to take your ball and go home and ignore me then be my guest. Come back when you have solid facts...if you can.
Click to expand...

Hello everyone else,

I am placing this poster on my permanent Ignore List because he failed the test for being a human.

Here is how you can tell.

Write something very simple which requires an answer.

Except when you write it, spell it so badly that no spell checker can possibly decipher what you're saying. And maybe break some multi-syllable words into separate words. But make it so that if someone tries to pronounce it: 'eggs actly thu waaay U roat it,' they can figure out what it says. No computer program can do that ... YET.

If there is no response, a put-down, a shove-off, a diversion, etc, you have been talking to a bot. Guess who does that to the USA?

I now believe that BodyDouble is a Russian Bot.
 
PoliTalker said:
Hello everyone else,

I am placing this poster on my permanent Ignore List because he failed the test for being a human.

Here is how you can tell.

Write something very simple which requires an answer.

Except when you write it, spell it so badly that no spell checker can possibly decipher what you're saying. But make it so that if someone tries to pronounce it: 'eggs actly thu waaay U roat it,' they can figure out what it says. No computer program can do that ... YET.

If there is no response, a put-down, a shove-off, a diversion, etc, you have been talking to a bot. Guess who does that to the USA?

I now believe that BodyDouble is a Russian Bot.
Click to expand...

creative insults also out them

they are not programed to respond to them


you are catching on


Good
 
PoliTalker said:
Hello everyone else,

I am placing this poster on my permanent Ignore List because he failed the test for being a human.

Here is how you can tell.

Write something very simple which requires an answer.

Except when you write it, spell it so badly that no spell checker can possibly decipher what you're saying. But make it so that if someone tries to pronounce it: 'eggs actly thu waaay U roat it,' they can figure out what it says. No computer program can do that ... YET.

If there is no response, a put-down, a shove-off, a diversion, etc, you have been talking to a bot. Guess who does that to the USA?

I now believe that BodyDouble is a Russian Bot.
Click to expand...

You may as well add me to your ever growing list too since you disagree with my beliefs. It's what liberals do when they have no legitimate argument.
 
PoliTalker said:
Hello everyone else,

I am placing this poster on my permanent Ignore List because he failed the test for being a human.

Here is how you can tell.

Write something very simple which requires an answer.

Except when you write it, spell it so badly that no spell checker can possibly decipher what you're saying. And maybe break some multi-syllable words into separate words. But make it so that if someone tries to pronounce it: 'eggs actly thu waaay U roat it,' they can figure out what it says. No computer program can do that ... YET.

If there is no response, a put-down, a shove-off, a diversion, etc, you have been talking to a bot. Guess who does that to the USA?

I now believe that BodyDouble is a Russian Bot.
Click to expand...

LMFAO! Whatever floats your boat. Try taking the tin foil off of your head and understand that others don't buy the stuff you make up. Sorry that you can't deal with facts and truth when someone challenges what you post.
 
Hello RB 60,

RB 60 said:
You may as well add me to your ever growing list too since you disagree with my beliefs.
Click to expand...

I don't put people on Ignore for having different beliefs. I debate them!

RB 60 said:
It's what liberals do when they have no legitimate argument.
Click to expand...

That's incorrect because I am liberal and I don't do that.

Here's the thing. You don't have to stereotype the other side. It really is not a good idea. It can prevent you from better understanding. It can actually limit your ability to grasp the big picture. You may want to listen to what I am about to say, because I think you will realize it is correct.

There are probably no two liberals alike. Or conservatives, for that matter. People are people. There's good ones and bad ones on both sides.

You probably know both liberals and conservatives among the people in your life. Everybody's got problems. Everybody has some success and failure in their life. Nobody's perfect. Each individual is unique. Every person has their own perception of the world. Depending on the influences in their life, and the issues which are important to them, that will determine their position on the political spectrum. It's not just A or B. It's not even all along one spectrum. It's three dimensional, four dimensional. There's people all over the place with their own unique collection of views. And they change. There's very little you can say that people who share political views have in common besides the views they share.

Don't you know any nice people who are liberals in real life? Maybe you know somebody nice and you don't know they are really a liberal.

You and I could become familiar sparing partners here if you don't intend on making it personal or telling me off. I'm looking for people who can engage in civil discourse. What your beliefs are not a criteria for that. Actually I end up in more conversations with conservatives than liberals because I don't find cause to dispel incorrect statements by liberals as frequently as I do for conservatives.

So what do you say?

Wanna go at it?

Your intellect against mine?

Pick a Topic.

Or just sit back and contemplate a higher level of understanding and mutual respect among Americans. I presume you are an American. Are you? I am.
 
RB 60 said:
You may as well add me to your ever growing list too since you disagree with my beliefs. It's what liberals do when they have no legitimate argument.
Click to expand...

I'm a liberal you rat shit bag


I have NEVER banned anyone from anything fuckfart


I have argued with people here for over a decade


and it was I who was proven correct in the end huh
 
PoliTalker said:
Hello RB 60,



I don't put people on Ignore for having different beliefs. I debate them!



That's incorrect because I am liberal and I don't do that.

Here's the thing. You don't have to stereotype the other side. It really is not a good idea. It can prevent you from better understanding. It can actually limit your ability to grasp the big picture. You may want to listen to what I am about to say, because I think you will realize it is correct.

There are probably no two liberals alike. Or conservatives, for that matter. People are people. There's good ones and bad ones on both sides.

You probably know both liberals and conservatives among the people in your life. Everybody's got problems. Everybody has some success and failure in their life. Nobody's perfect. Each individual is unique. Every person has their own perception of the world. Depending on the influences in their life, and the issues which are important to them, that will determine their position on the political spectrum. It's not just A or B. It's not even all along one spectrum. It's three dimensional, four dimensional. There's people all over the place with their own unique collection of views. And they change. There's very little you can say that people who share political views have in common besides the views they share.

Don't you know any nice people who are liberals in real life? Maybe you know somebody nice and you don't know they are really a liberal.

You and I could become familiar sparing partners here if you don't intend on making it personal or telling me off. I'm looking for people who can engage in civil discourse. What your beliefs are not a criteria for that. Actually I end up in more conversations with conservatives than liberals because I don't find cause to dispel incorrect statements by liberals as frequently as I do for conservatives.

So what do you say?

Wanna go at it?

Your intellect against mine?

Pick a Topic.

Or just sit back and contemplate a higher level of understanding and mutual respect among Americans. I presume you are an American. Are you? I am.
Click to expand...
Is this guy for real?

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
smb said:
Except my "claim" is backed by law.

Strict Liability https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/Abnormally_dangerous_activity

In tort law, an activity that (1) is not of common usage, and (2) creates a foreseeable and highly significant risk of physical harm even when reasonable care is exercised by all actors. See Restatement (Third) of Torts § 20(b) (2009). A person who is found by a court to have carried on an abnormally dangerous activity will be subject to strict liability for physical harm resulting from that activity. See id. § 20(a) (2009).

As you can see all elements of strict liability are met to hold gun manufacturers accountable. Or would be had not the NRA paid Congress to make so they are not.
Click to expand...

They are held accountable you stupid liar.

Why aren't you claiming knife manufacturers should be liable for deaths caused by stabbing?
 
smb said:
Except my "claim" is backed by law.

Strict Liability https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/Abnormally_dangerous_activity

In tort law, an activity that (1) is not of common usage, and (2) creates a foreseeable and highly significant risk of physical harm even when reasonable care is exercised by all actors. See Restatement (Third) of Torts § 20(b) (2009). A person who is found by a court to have carried on an abnormally dangerous activity will be subject to strict liability for physical harm resulting from that activity. See id. § 20(a) (2009).

As you can see all elements of strict liability are met to hold gun manufacturers accountable. Or would be had not the NRA paid Congress to make so they are not.
Click to expand...

Btw stupid, that is not product liability

:rofl2:
 
PoliTalker said:
Hello BodyDouble,



You just don't like the numbers because they do not support your position. It's based on solid data from the CDC. CDC - Causes of Death by Age for 2016 You can't refute my math; so now you're dictating how my posts should be comprised. That is the diversionary tactic of an unsupportable position.

Sounds like I'm talking to a Russian bot.

Wutz tew en tew

Ansaar thu humon veri-phikashun qweschun ore whee argh dunn
Click to expand...

I thought you wanted civil discourse and threatened to place on ignore those who insult you and yet here you are insulting another member.
 
smb said:
You obviously don't know what is meant by the terms qualified immunity and absolute immunity as they do not protect government employees who acting outside the normal scope of their duties. Which includes illegal activity and abuse. Again fucking idiotic.
Click to expand...

So are murderers :pke:

And stop lying that gun manufacturers have zero liability.
 
PoliTalker said:
Hello BodyDouble,



They most certainly do. It requires more than one click. First go to

CDC - Causes of Death by Age for 2016.

Then, for each age group, click each time on 'Unintential,' 'Homicide,' and 'Suicide.' Total the results for 'Firearms' and 'Drowning.'

You did not reply to my coded message which only a live breathing human could possibly answer.

I now strongly suspect I am talking to a fake sfotware progran.

You failed the test. One more chance:

Wutz tew en tew

Ansaar thu above humon veri-phikashun qweschun ore whee arrrrr dunn

It is very simple if you just try to say the above. Eye will place U on eegnoor unless the proper responze is givan.

Eye don't talk 2 rooski baughts hoo kant reeeed fonetikaly
Click to expand...

More insults....
 
Yaya said:
So are murderers :pke:

And stop lying that gun manufacturers have zero liability.
Click to expand...

Where did I say they have zero liability. I said they are immune from strict liability thanks to Congress being paid by the NRA. The only liability they have is if the there gun malfunctions. Why are you lying about what I have said?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top