A primer and discussion of the 14th Amendment, Section 1.

Do you realize how triggered you sound. We are talking the 14th amendment are we not? Is Section 1325 in Title 8 of the United States Code in the Constitution?

What is the point of your whiny outbursts and emotional babbling here? Did someone NOT receive due process?

Who is not getting due process?

WHAT IS YOUR POINT and the cause of all your EMOTIONAL ANGST?

giphy.gif
 

"The Immigration and Nationality Act ('INA') authorizes the Attorney General to grant asylum if an alien is unable or unwilling to return to their country of origin because she has suffered past persecution or has a well-founded fear of future persecution on account of 'race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.'"[1]
The United States is obliged to recognize valid claims for asylum under the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol. As defined by these agreements, a refugee is a person who is outside their country of nationality (or place of habitual residence if stateless) who, owing to a fear of persecution on account of a protected ground, is unable or unwilling to avail himself of the protection of the state. Protected grounds include race, nationality, religion, political opinion and membership of a particular social group. The signatories to these agreements are further obliged not to return or "refoul" refugees to the place where they would face persecution.
This commitment was codified and expanded with the passing of the Refugee Act of 1980 by the United States Congress. Besides reiterating the definitions of the 1951 Convention and its Protocol, the Refugee Act provided for the establishment of an Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to help refugees begin their lives in the U.S. The structure and procedures evolved and by 2004, federal handling of refugee affairs was led by the Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration (PRM) of the U.S. Department of State, working with the ORR at HHS. Asylum claims are mainly the responsibility of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).






hmmm lets see the actual laws of this nation

or


what some diarrhea pools on the internets say



wow that was easy
 
Trump is suggesting that we should deport people without a hearing. That would be denying those people due process.

Why do they need a hearing? How is that not giving them due process? Are you telling me that the minute someone steps onto American soil ILLEGALLY, they are automatically granted the right to an attorney and a court hearing? Why?

The 14th was also called the "reconstruction amendment" Alternative Title: “Citizen rights not to be abridged” I still can't find ILLEGALS anywhere in there.
 
Illegals (non-citizens) have the right, by immigration law, to be arrested and deported.

If they don't like this process, don't break our immigration laws.

Stay in your own country, we determine who can and can not enter. Why? because it's our country, not theirs.
 
Is an "Illegal" a person, because if so, then an "Illegal" is included in the clear meaning of "ALL PEOPLE". Fucking idiot.

Not what the 14th amendment was intended for snowflake. I know you want to scream and stomp your little feet in a fit of TDS anger; but the 14th had NOTHING to do with ILLEGALS having rights. NADA. Maybe if we say it a thousand more times, like we have over Russian collusion, you would finally start to actually comprehend the OBVIOUS.
 
Illegals (non-citizens) have the right, by immigration law, to be arrested and deported.

If they don't like this process, don't break our immigration laws.

Stay in your own country, we determine who can and can not enter. Why? because it's our country, not theirs.

go move to that country you are imagining
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asylum..._United_States
"The Immigration and Nationality Act ('INA') authorizes the Attorney General to grant asylum if an alien is unable or unwilling to return to their country of origin because she has suffered past persecution or has a well-founded fear of future persecution on account of 'race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.'"[1]
The United States is obliged to recognize valid claims for asylum under the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol. As defined by these agreements, a refugee is a person who is outside their country of nationality (or place of habitual residence if stateless) who, owing to a fear of persecution on account of a protected ground, is unable or unwilling to avail himself of the protection of the state. Protected grounds include race, nationality, religion, political opinion and membership of a particular social group. The signatories to these agreements are further obliged not to return or "refoul" refugees to the place where they would face persecution.
This commitment was codified and expanded with the passing of the Refugee Act of 1980 by the United States Congress. Besides reiterating the definitions of the 1951 Convention and its Protocol, the Refugee Act provided for the establishment of an Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to help refugees begin their lives in the U.S. The structure and procedures evolved and by 2004, federal handling of refugee affairs was led by the Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration (PRM) of the U.S. Department of State, working with the ORR at HHS. Asylum claims are mainly the responsibility of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
 
Illegals (non-citizens) have the right, by immigration law, to be arrested and deported.

If they don't like this process, don't break our immigration laws.

Stay in your own country, we determine who can and can not enter. Why? because it's our country, not theirs.
 
Illegals (non-citizens) have the right, by immigration law, to be arrested and deported.

If they don't like this process, don't break our immigration laws.

Stay in your own country, we determine who can and can not enter. Why? because it's our country, not theirs.

Who decides they are immigrants, illegals?
 
hmmmmm



ass miners on the internets


or


facts ?




mouthpoop all day long bot hole boys


the only voters stupid enough to keep voting republican don't come to places like this and STAY republicans



too many facts being aired here
 
I know why it was passed, it was passed because of DEMOCRAT Southerners propensity to refuse citizenship to certain classes of people and use that lack of citizenship to discriminate against them. The Amendment defined citizenship and then PROHIBITED taking certain rights from NON-CITIZENS (ANY PEOPLE) ever again.

The Amendment prohibits our government from taking anything from ALL PEOPLE without due process of law.

FTFY
 
It clearly states All persons born or naturalized in the United States I didn't see any qualification for people who come here ILLEGALLY, did you?

Yes...is there something about "ANY" you don't understand? That's a pretty significant qualification but think about it. Why shouldn't all people in our nation, regardless of their legal status, have the right to due process and equal protection before the law? It would be uncivilized not too.

If we remove that protection of the 14th amendment you could commit and number of transgression or crimes against those persons and they would have no protections or right to due process? That's just stupid. That's like saying it would be ok to murder or rape an illegal alien and they would have no recourse under the law? It would also make doing business within the US for non citizens extremely risky. Who in their right mind would come to the US to make a business investment if they have no rights to dues process and equal protection under that law. That would be just crazy.

So the qualification in the 14th ammendment doesn't not extend all US Citizens rights to anyone....just the right to due process and equal protection under that law. Which is how a civilized society should behave. Some rights are universal human rights.
 
Back
Top