Ahmaud Arbery shooting

[Concart]

There's no proof whatsoever that the sick sock knows "Brunswick very well."

His unverifiable claim is a weak anecdotal appeal to authority.

Same proof you have that I am a sock. But it didn't stop you, did it?

 

[Truth Detector]

The report says they chased him because they thought he was a burglar.

Not illegal.

Looks to me like two homos used their truck to block a jogger's path.

Again, all homos look alike? What is their distinguishing characteristic?

When he ran past the vehicle, I hear a shot fired from the homo standing in the back of the truck.

That wasn't in the video. Why lie about this? Did you read the report? It was consistent with what I saw in the video.

Then I see the homo driver jump out and attack a man attempting to flee after being shot at.

I didn't see that in the video posted. So homo's are bad people?

Then I see a struggle over a long gun.

I think you only see what you want to and not what actually happened.

 

[Legion]

He was unarmed.

Who told you the deceased was unarmed?

 

[Truth Detector]

I cannot understand why Bigdog is playing along with the liberal narrative.

...and acting all homophobic and shit.

 

[MAGA MAN]

No. The reaction across the board is outrage. Yawn.

Sure, that's why you said "even the Trumpettes".

 

[Legion]

Same proof you have that I am a sock. But it didn't stop you, did it?

I don't recall offering any proof that you are a sock. It's my opinion, nothing more.

 

[Truth Detector]

Contrary to leftwing memes, ... being a homo doesn't automatically make you "enlightened", and most homos do not look effeminate.

So you just know these two are bad homos because????

 

[Legion]

...and acting all homophobic and shit.

He's irrelevant, as are his spurious claims.

 

[Truth Detector]

Last night, I looked through the comments on a Fox News article about the murder and was surprised to see universal condemnation. I thought this was finally something we'd all be able to agree on. I should have known I'd see apologists here—this place really is a cesspool.

How am I being an apologist to murder? Be specific; but only AFTER you read the report and watch the video.

 

[Legion]

Sure, that's why you said "even the Trumpettes".

Ask him to prove his claims and see what happens.

 

[Earl]

Women use guns to defend themselves against an unarmed attacker. Men can do so also. If you are attacked, you are allowed to defend yourself.

 

[Truth Detector]

You aren't seeing apologists here. You're seeing people who are more concerned with due process and the rule of law than they are with virtue signaling.

I think JoeFromFargo is just your run-of-the-mill thread trolling leftist douchebag.

 

[Truth Detector]

I'm not going to engage your galactically stupid game of gotcha. But it was a cute try. The man was unarmed. Period. End of story.

Yet you attempt to do just that.

 

[Truth Detector]

No. The reaction across the board is outrage. Yawn.

Really? Apparently when you are a leftist douchebag, you make up your own version of reality too.

 

[Legion]

I think JoeFromFargo is just your run-of-the-mill thread trolling leftist douchebag.

I suspect there are several of them extant. I call upon the moderators to enforce the rule regarding multiple accounts.

 

[Earl]

Nope, but you just lied. Twice.

You admitted your post was wrong, moron.

Senility?

 

[Legion]

Who told you he wasn't. See, I can ask stupid questions too, troll.

If I'd claimed the deceased was armed, you'd have a point.

Since I didn't, you don't.

But you claimed the deceased was unarmed.

He was unarmed.

Who told you the deceased was unarmed?

 

[Bigdog]

So you just know these two are bad homos because????

Just my opinion, TD.

 

[Mott the Hoople]

I'm holding back here because I haven't seen the video and admittedly not all the facts get immediately released but it seems pretty f'ing clear these two armed dudes chased this unarmed guy, threatened him and it seems put him in an untenable position.

I'm a second amendment supporter but I do not support two people with guns threatening someone who is unarmed and then shooting that unarmed person by claiming they were attacked. I find it difficult to believe that would be legal under any laws either.

The second amendment has nothing to do with it. There are specific rules to open carry laws and it looks like these two idiots violated them.

Even if the kid was involved in a crime, and there’s been no published evidence he had, it’s still not appropriate to kill someone.

These two clowns should be in jail.

 

[Legion]

Women use guns to defend themselves against an unarmed attacker. Men can do so also. If you are attacked, you are allowed to defend yourself.

That's already been established.