AL LAW, MEN 50+ or having fathered 3 biological kids--MANDATORY VASECTOMIES....

Bigdog said:
Hey. I don't know why you raped your father. I don't really care. Other rapists do so because they are horny. Psychologists are usually people who need psychological help.

Anyway, I'm sure it was just because you wanted to bust a nut.
Click to expand...
You hurt with your words. Did your mother come?
 
Centerleftfl said:
Uh oh, lawmakers are coming after 'your' MANHOOD now. It was one thing when it was the 'girls', now it's serious! Not to worry, a 'GIRL' introduced it. A DEMOCRAT. Besides the ONLY way this would ever even make it to conference, and it likely would--if it was RACE specific.


[FONT=&]Ted Cruz takes aim at Alabama vasectomy bill: 'Yikes'

[FONT=&]BY ARIS FOLLEY - 02/16/20 07:23 PM EST[/FONT] 2,755
[/FONT]

​
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) took aim at legislation recently introduced in Alabama by a state representative that would, if passed, make it mandatory for certain men to get vasectomies – a bill that comes in response to legislation passed last year that seeks to ban abortion in the state.

“Yikes,” Cruz wrote in response to the bill on Twitter on Sunday morning. “A government big enough to give you everything is big enough to take everything...literally!”

Cruz was referring to legislation introduced by Alabama state Rep. Rolanda Hollis (D) last week that would, if passed, require men over the age of 50 in the state to get vasectomies as well as men who have had at least three biological children. [FONT=&][FONT=&][FONT=&]
Cruz’s tweet, which has racked up over 14,000 likes in hours, received even more comments from critics who felt his response proved Hollis’ point behind the measure.

[/FONT]​[/FONT][/FONT][FONT=&]“Under existing law, there are no restrictions on the reproductive rights of men,” a synopsis for Hollis' [/FONT]bill states[FONT=&]. "This bill would require a man to undergo a vasectomy within one month of his 50th birthday or the birth of his third biological child, whichever comes first."[/FONT][FONT=&]In an interview with AL.com last week, Hollis said that the legislation comes in response to a law passed in the state last year that seeks to make abortion illegal almost all case, including in instances of rape or incest. The bill has not yet taken effect after being blocked in court.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]“The vasectomy bill is to help with the reproductive system, and yes, it is to neutralize the abortion ban bill ... it always takes two to tango," she told the outlet.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]“We can’t put all the responsibility on women. Men need to be responsible also,” she also said...[/FONT]


https://thehill.com/homenews/senate...bama-bill-requiring-men-get-vasectomies-at-50
Click to expand...

WHAT AN ASININE, BARABARIC BILL. MAYBE WE SHOULD JSUT KILL THE FEMALE CHILDREN. LIKE YOUR RED CHINESE HEROES, HUH?
 
CFM said:
Can you explain why someone already receiving social welfare handouts to feed their kids, whatever number that may be, would think having another one makes things more affordable?
Click to expand...

They get more Aid to dependent children,and food stamps.
 
evince said:
its your party and trumpy who want to starve and leave bleeding on the street people without money


they cut all help programs with fucking glee

even the ones FEEDING Hungry pregnant women and children

that is the abortion plan the republicans love


starve the hungry pregnant woman until she spontaneously aborts
Click to expand...

Can you ever post anything without lying? That's a rhetorical question. Trump never cut any programs for pregnant women or children so shut the fuck up you stupid fucking bitch.
 
countryboy said:
Can you ever post anything without lying? That's a rhetorical question. Trump never cut any programs for pregnant women or children so shut the fuck up you stupid fucking bitch.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure she's ever posted anything that is not full of incoherent raging lies....maybe back in the "day"...not lately...
 
CFM said:
Can you explain why someone already receiving social welfare handouts to feed their kids, whatever number that may be, would think having another one makes things more affordable?
Click to expand...

Don't bother anyone who bring Nazi-ism into the conversation has already lost!
 
Wolverine said:
I understand, the communities she comes from are the ones with the biggest problem!
Click to expand...

It's clear why she was elected. Demographics explains it all:

Alabama House of Representatives District 58
Current incumbent Rolanda Hollis Democratic Party
Population 37,443
Race: 19% White, 0.2% American Indian or Alaska Native, 1% Two or More Races, 0.4% Asian, 1.5% Other, 77.9% Black, 0% Pacific Islander[1]
Voting age 73.5% age 18 and over

Approximately 35 - 36,000 people of which 29,000 are black. 30.5% of them are on food stamps.
 
Centerleftfl said:
Yeah right, let's have another one. We'll be rich.
Click to expand...

Perhaps you can explain why someone already using social welfare to feed their kids, whatever number that may be, thinks it will be more affordable if they have another.

The problem is what they're getting is what someone else earned.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top