An Indian from a shit hole country
- Thread starter AProudLefty
- Start date
You cannot create a geometrically perfect, idealized Euclidean circle in real life. Microscopic imperfections in the printing surface medium, imperfections in the drafting tools, atomic sized or pixelated imperfections in a digital representation.
In real life, errors can be arbitrarily minimized but never eliminated.
The geometrically perfect, idealized Euclidean circle only exists in the mind as an abstract mathematical object.
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
we could revolutionize construction with compasses with Lazer cutters on the tips.
oh wait.
this was the khazar trick to end tartarian construction.
I see it now.
oh wait.
this was the khazar trick to end tartarian construction.
I see it now.
Compasses are drafting tools, and all physical tools have small margins of error that can be minimized but never completely eliminated. The paper surface itself introduces tiny imperfections. Euclidean geometric space is perfectly and ideally flat.
The geometrically perfect, idealized Euclidean circle only exists in the mind as an abstract mathematical object.
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
may you all receive the gift of discernment.
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
I could make percect circles in stone with a compass with lazer cutters on it.
Are compass circles 'perfect'?
No, circles drawn with a real physical compass are not mathematically perfect. [1]Why Physical Compass Circles Fall Short
- Mechanical Play: The hinge or joint in a real compass can flex, wobble, or slip slightly while rotating.
- Pencil Lead Width: The graphite tip has thickness, meaning the drawn line has width rather than being an infinitely thin geometric curve.
- Pivot Slip: The metal needle point can wiggle, enlarge the center hole, or shift off its exact starting coordinate.
- Surface Irregularities: Variations in the paper texture or the underlying desk surface cause microscopic bumps in the line
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
AI lies.
we know this.
they are perfect.
I could make perfect circles in stone with a compass with Lazer pointers on it.
All physical tools, drawing surfaces, and physical mediums introduce tiny margins of error which cannot be entirely eliminated.
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
I disagree.
we should switch to using drafting tool with Lazer cutters in the field and cut out the errors of decimality altogether.
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
this is how a god with Lazer beam eyes would build things.
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
dammit paw.
jews are trying to steal the perfection of pure and basic geometry again.
jews are trying to steal the perfection of pure and basic geometry again.
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
the Lazer light bending is how all the high end chips are made now.
very precise light bending through different thin metal emulsions.
very precise light bending through different thin metal emulsions.
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
light bending and etching techniques.
To summarize the litany of things you got wrong in this thread:
1) A geometrically perfect, idealized Euclidean circle does not exist, and cannot be created in the real world.
2) Pi does not have some finite value we can represent as a quantity.
3) There are an uncountable infinite amount of numbers between 3.14 and 3.15.
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
This a mix of wrongness and distractions.
Thanks.
Wut?