Anatta was right - NYT confirms Deep State White House coup attempt is real

Thing1 said:
One of my favorite things for the past decade+ has been the repeated attempts by the right to give "credit" to Democrats and the left for Bush's war - completely forgetting how right after Saddam's statue fell, they were tripping over themselves calling the Dems traitors, terrorist-sympathizers and repeatedly saying they were on the "wrong side of history."

Bush made the decision to invade Iraq. Iraq will always be his war.
Click to expand...

Going into Iraq and verifying Sadaam didn't have WMD's was the right thing to do.
We didn't go in because he had WMD's, we went in to verify that he didn't.
And it is fact that he did have WMD's., that's not speculation, unless you think the Kurds gassed themselves.

Post 911 was a different time, and you would be hard pressed to find anyone except the skirt wearers that didn't want Bush to go in. At the time.

The left has since then tried to make Iraq out to be some kind of proof that republicans are hawkish to a triggered fault.

and he was given months and months and many chances to prove he had gotten rid of them, he chose to stand on his soap box and yell "look at me look at me" with the wrong guy in charge over here.
Now what Bush did after it was verified no WMD's is a different story. Poor planning and kid gloves, bad ideas.

now back on topic, Deep state is hard at work, but the tree they are barking up is dead. theres no leaves.
 
Getin the ring said:
Going into Iraq and verifying Sadaam didn't have WMD's was the right thing to do.
We didn't go in because he had WMD's, we went in to verify that he didn't.
And it is fact that he did have WMD's., that's not speculation, unless you think the Kurds gassed themselves.

Post 911 was a different time, and you would be hard pressed to find anyone except the skirt wearers that didn't want Bush to go in. At the time.

The left has since then tried to make Iraq out to be some kind of proof that republicans are hawkish to a triggered fault.

and he was given months and months and many chances to prove he had gotten rid of them, he chose to stand on his soap box and yell "look at me look at me" with the wrong guy in charge over here.
Now what Bush did after it was verified no WMD's is a different story. Poor planning and kid gloves, bad ideas.

now back on topic, Deep state is hard at work, but the tree they are barking up is dead. theres no leaves.
Click to expand...

the GOP hemorrhaged because of the mistakes of Bush.

We don't want to be an Empire policing the world. Why can't conservatives learn a lesson? Sheer arrogance is the only thing I can come up with, which isn't conservative at all.
 
Getin the ring said:
Going into Iraq and verifying Sadaam didn't have WMD's was the right thing to do.
We didn't go in because he had WMD's, we went in to verify that he didn't.
And it is fact that he did have WMD's., that's not speculation, unless you think the Kurds gassed themselves.

Post 911 was a different time, and you would be hard pressed to find anyone except the skirt wearers that didn't want Bush to go in. At the time.

The left has since then tried to make Iraq out to be some kind of proof that republicans are hawkish to a triggered fault.

and he was given months and months and many chances to prove he had gotten rid of them, he chose to stand on his soap box and yell "look at me look at me" with the wrong guy in charge over here.
Now what Bush did after it was verified no WMD's is a different story. Poor planning and kid gloves, bad ideas.

now back on topic, Deep state is hard at work, but the tree they are barking up is dead. theres no leaves.
Click to expand...

Not good enough.

You were wrong about Iraq and are too stubborn to admit it. That's why war is a last resort - because when you commit, you open a Pandora's Box of negative outcomes.

Funny to see you refer to Trump as a "skirt wearer." And lame of you to characterize those who don't want to unnecessarily put our military in harm's way that way.
 
anatta said:
The only real proof we have is the Mueller indictments on the Internet Security Agency,nd that was just a Russian troll farm.
Click to expand...

Right...a troll farm that was directed by the FSB, which was acting on Putin's orders to benefit Trump in the election. We know because that's what Putin said.
 
anatta said:
no shit. but he was in charge of the investigation, and the ensuing pig circus.
Click to expand...

No, Comey was in charge of the investigation because Comey was head of the FBI. Firing Comey allowed Trump to install a puppet in the FBI who would then fire Strzok. This is how conspiracies and cover ups work, dude.
 
Darth Omar said:
Let me get this straight.

This newest effort to ‘stop Trump’ came at the cost of the NYT revealing that there is, in fact, a Deep State that is aligned against a duly elected president.

Comrade Anatta has indeed been vindicated lol.
Click to expand...
The problem with your gotcha is that it is within his own administration, senior at that, that Trump appointed.
 
Getin the ring said:
So Russia interfered in the 2016 election?
Who was president? I believe it was the Kenyan
Who was head of the FBI? Mueller, and then followed by Comey at election time
Who was head of the National Intelligence agency? Clapper
Who was head of the CIA? Brennan
Click to expand...

All of whom were investigating these attacks, and all of whom produced an intelligence report that Trump was given in January 2017 that showed proof Putin personally ordered the attacks. And we know he did it to help Trump because that's what he said himself.

So yeah, the attacks happened during Obama because Trump was running for President while Obama was President.

Putin ordered the attacks himself, Comey was investigating it, then Trump fired Comey to stop the investigation.
 
LV426 said:
No, Comey was in charge of the investigation because Comey was head of the FBI. Firing Comey allowed Trump to install a puppet in the FBI who would then fire Strzok. This is how conspiracies and cover ups work, dude.
Click to expand...

then invited Russian spys to the oval office and bragged the investigation would no longer go after him
 
Getin the ring said:
And please answer the retarded question, it would let us all give you the benefit of the doubt, like we have a special needs student at work that we all let them vent.
because some of the things you say are just really juvenile.
Click to expand...

When this shit comes to a head, people like you will delete these accounts and create new ones that try to pass yourselves off as non-Trump supporters.

No one's going to buy it, by the way.
 
Grumpy said:
OH NO, NO, NO! Saddam was a threat to his neighbors which in turn was a direct threat to the US's security. No Bush did the right thing it was after the hostilities that he fucked up.
Click to expand...

He wasn't a threat to his neighbors.

Bush lied to you, lied to Congress, lied to the American people so he could get his Iraq War.
 
evince said:
the dutch have it on tape idiot



the dutch hacked into the building the Russian troll farm used


got control of their security cameras


taped and listened to them for years idiot


they heard and saw it all


the people talked to each other about what they were doing


the dutch got to know the peoples kids birthdays and what they ate for lunch


ITS ALL ON TAPE


the orders they received from the kremlin


the papers on their desks

EVERYFUCKINGTHING



the republican party is dead


your shits are placing a dead in the water party over country
Click to expand...

The great Conservative re-branding will commence soon. All Conservative posters on these boards will either delete their accounts and create new ones, or they'll just lie and pretend they never supported Trump.
 
"Anatta was right"

He sure the fuck is......a racist "right" wing nut job who doesn't know jack shit.
 
Thing1 said:
Re: the bolded - guess you still haven't learned.

Here's the deal: war is a last resort, always. And only when there is an immediate threat to our national security.

Iraq was a war of choice, unnecessary for our national security, and a blunder of historic proportions. Anyone who still tries to justify that invasion should recuse themselves from discussion of any foreign policy going forward.
Click to expand...

The Iraq War was the worst foreign policy blunder since Vietnam.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top