Another one of those “law biding good guys,”

[signalmankenneth]

I hope they throw the book at this dumb-ass, you have to be crazy to open up with a firearm on an interstate, you can hit and kill innocent drivers who were not even involved in this?!! A lot of us should not have guns, this is one of many that shouldn't?!!

 

[volsrock]

And the right’s solution, more guns, everybody should be packing, who knows, someone next to you on the highway might piss you off

Chicago and Minneapolis is full of black felons that are Saints

 

[leaningright]

https://www.westernjournal.com/pizz...HnhT__qVWlJWVX4s8FVhHdt5CgE2DAi4aWLkPXU79ZFME

The driver proceeded to shoot the would-be carjacker six times.

…

As of Jan. 28, 2022, there had already been 90 carjacking during the calendar year in Philadelphia, the Post reporterd. If that pace continued all year, the city would see over 1,000 carjackings.

 

[volsrock]

https://www.westernjournal.com/pizz...HnhT__qVWlJWVX4s8FVhHdt5CgE2DAi4aWLkPXU79ZFME

90 carjacking during the calendar year in Philadelphia, the Post reporterd. If that pace continued all year, the city would see over 1,000 carjackings.


99.8% are done by blacks

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Tell us again about how we should all carry guns everywhere, goobers.

when the shooting started, who was called? SOMEONE WITH A GUN!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[leaningright]

Same old spiel …

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing...a-gun-violence-prevention-task-force-meeting/

We talk like there’s no amendment that’s absolute. When the amendment was passed, it didn’t say anybody can own a gun and any kind of gun and any kind of weapon. You couldn’t buy a cannon in — when the — this — this amendment was passed. And so, no reason why you should be able to buy certain assault weapons. But that’s another issue.

…

But Congress needs to do its part too: pass universal background checks, ban assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, close loopholes, and keep out of the hands of domestic abusers — weapons, repeal the liability shield for gun manufacturers.

…

Why gun manufacturers? Because of the power of their lobbying ability. It’s got to end. End. They’ve got to be held responsible for the things that they do that are irresponsible.

 

[Nomad]

when the shooting started, who was called? SOMEONE WITH A GUN!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Not a trigger-happy, dumbass redneck civilian though.

They called a team of highly trained professional LEOs to handle the situation knowing that more shooting would be a last resort.

Note the difference.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Not a trigger-happy, dumbass redneck civilian though.

They called a team of highly trained professional LEOs to handle the situation knowing that more shooting would be a last resort.

Note the difference.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

how many times on this forum have we watched you and your lefty cohorts eviscerate police for killing unarmed people or innocent bystanders only to sit here now and watch you pull out the 'highly trained professional' bullshit...........

you idiots should really just come out of the anti gun closet and admit that you only want guns in the hands of your nazi enforcement agents and that you hate and despise civilians as completely incompetent morons who should do nothing but obey your dictates? seriously, it would make you look less like a retard if you just embraced honesty for once.

 

[leaningright]

Not a trigger-happy, dumb@#$ redneck civilian though.

They called a team of highly trained professional LEOs to handle the situation knowing that more shooting would be a last resort.

Note the difference.

And if LE is an hour away?

 

[Walt]

No limits!

You said that nuclear bombs are a "bit much." If no limit, then we can not ban foreign countries from giving nuclear weapons to American citizens. North Korea would no longer need to develop ICBMs, they could simply export nuclear weapons to the USA.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

So you do not believe in an absolute right to bear arms. So now the question is where do we place the limits?

this is a cute little trick pulled by lefties. Jarod does this alot with the whole 'no right is absolute' argument as he completely disregards the 5th Amendment. it falls right in to the hands of the 'all rights can be regulated' bullshit that people who are terrified of the freedom of others use because they need to 'control' the population so they feel safer in society

 

[LV426]

this is a cute little trick pulled by lefties. Jarod does this alot with the whole 'no right is absolute' argument as he completely disregards the 5th Amendment. it falls right in to the hands of the 'all rights can be regulated' bullshit that people who are terrified of the freedom of others use because they need to 'control' the population so they feel safer in society

Seems to me, the only terrified person is the one who is arming themselves like a doomsday cult because of supposed "government overreach" they're too afraid to articulate or confront.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Seems to me, the only terrified person is the one who is arming themselves like a doomsday cult because of supposed "government overreach" they're too afraid to articulate or confront.

I wonder why they are hesitant...............probably because of the cowardly leftists ready to report anyone they don't like to the FBI, hoping that 'government bullets' will rid them of those they are terrified of.

 

[Walt]

this is a cute little trick pulled by lefties. Jarod does this alot with the whole 'no right is absolute' argument as he completely disregards the 5th Amendment. it falls right in to the hands of the 'all rights can be regulated' bullshit that people who are terrified of the freedom of others use because they need to 'control' the population so they feel safer in society

The 5th Amendment places limits on itself. It does not say "you cannot be punished", it limits punishment to those who have first had due process of the law.

Conspiracy to a crime is not protected as free speech. There are reasonable limits on everything. So what are the reasonable limits to bear arms?

 

[SmarterthanYou]

The 5th Amendment places limits on itself. It does not say "you cannot be punished", it limits punishment to those who have first had due process of the law.

Conspiracy to a crime is not protected as free speech. There are reasonable limits on everything. So what are the reasonable limits to bear arms?

it says 'shall not be infringed'..........that would imply that the federal government has no power or authority over the arms of the people.............taking your 'reasonable limits' argument to imply that the people should be outgunned by the government is not only incorrect, but it's also hyperbolic. The framers were very clear during the ratification debates on WHY the feds can't touch our right to bear arms. Now, 'reasonable', might be looked at as the citizenry having the same access to any weapon that the government would use upon the citizenry, but then we'd have to deal with 'right fighters', like yourself, saying that limits accepted means that all rights can be regulated. If that's the path you feel you want to take to limit any right you don't like, then i'm taking the absolute path and I want fucking nukes. However, if you actually want to be logical about it, then lets deal specifically with what weapons the government would ACTUALLY use against us.

 

[LV426]

I wonder why they are hesitan

I don't...they're pussies who talk a big game but never back any of it up with muscle because it's a better grift that way.

probably because of the cowardly leftists ready to report anyone they don't like to the FBI

So let me get this straight...the armed-to-the-teeth ammosexuals are afraid of "cowardly" leftists reporting people to the FBI?

What would the leftists report to the FBI?

hoping that 'government bullets' will rid them of those they are terrified of.

What are you talking about?

 

[SmarterthanYou]

I don't...they're pussies who talk a big game but never back any of it up with muscle because it's a better grift that way.

you puffed your chest out way too much there. did your bra break?

So let me get this straight...the armed-to-the-teeth ammosexuals are afraid of "cowardly" leftists reporting people to the FBI?

you, like most other leftists including dutch uncle, do this alot......you purposefully misconstrue a statement and try to make it look like you're smart..........but you're not.

What would the leftists report to the FBI?

ask dutch uncle

What are you talking about?

talk to your deranged lunatic lefty evince about that

 

[LV426]

you puffed your chest out way too much there. did your bra break?

I'm not the one posturing that I'll take up arms against imagined government overreach, and then never following through on that promise.

 

[LV426]

you, like most other leftists including dutch uncle, do this alot......you purposefully misconstrue a statement and try to make it look like you're smart..........but you're not.

If we're misconstruing it, then you have nothing to fear from it.

 

[LV426]

ask dutch uncle

Well, I've reported several people on JPP to the FBI, including you...and the reason I did that was because you made an explicit, overt threat.

I warned you that would happen.

I warn everyone that I will never hesitate to report violent threats to the FBI.

But again, if all that is misconstrued, then you have nothing to fear and no justification for arming yourself like David Koresh.