Appears some on the right has sunk to even lower levels

It is amazing how JPP liberals are idolizing a 16 year old kid. They are Hogg Struck. Little crushes on the Hoggster


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
Stretch said:
Again, we're back to calling him a kid. He wants to be thought of as all grown up and taken seriously. So, if you think he's presenting himself as a mature adult, then treat him as one. When an adult dishes it out, that same adult has to prepare to be served the dish as well.
Otherwise, no one should be taking him seriously. But, some ARE. Soooooo he needs to man up then.
Can't have it both ways.
Click to expand...

Newsflash .. he's 17 years old. Feel free to call him an adult because it fits the goofy narrative.

At 17, he can have it both ways.

Newsflash .. Laura Ingraham has apologized after losing a 3rd of her sponsors. Do you think she's taking him seriously?
 
Thing1 said:
She's sort of a classic bully, anyway. I agree that I don't know why this stood out from her usual sarcastic, say-nothing nastiness, but how she remains a popular figure on the right eludes me.

Though I thought her speech at the convention was actually pretty good. If she could stick to a more positive message, she'd be an articulate spokesperson for the right. But this kind of tweet and "shut up & dribble" is much more her m.o.
Click to expand...

I like Laura, I enjoy her sarcasm and wit. I like Ann Coulter for the same reasons. I don't listen to talk radio for the politics I can form my own opinions and don't need the input of others but I do enjoy the comical side of politics. So if that makes me a right winger in some eyes so be it.
 
archives said:
"over nothing," no, a national media figure using her podium to personally ridicule a kid, definitely something that needs to be critized
Click to expand...

Your opinion, and she has been criticized as far as I'm concerned it's over. The problem with the media is they will drag this crap on until a fresh scandal comes out. I don't understand why you think it accomplishes anything beating a dead horse.
 
"Appears some on the right has sunk to even lower levels

https://mobile.twitter.com/IngrahamA...21639458459648

How bad can an adult get that they feel the need to hate a teenager so much they mock him online for getting rejected from colleges? Anything to make a buck " a #1
Click to expand...
I understand the definitions are being blurred.
Perhaps deliberately.

None the less:
- "right"
- conservative, &
- Republican are sometimes used interchangeably.

And this case included, they are not synonyms.

There is nothing conservative about ignorant hatred, or gratuitous public insult.

Please do not use the word "conservative" as a synonym for Republican.
- Republicans are not conservatives, and
- to do so is an insult to conservatives, and conservatism.
"... the magnificently misnamed "neo-conservatives", are the most radical people in this town [Washington DC]" George Will / ABC-TV This Week July 16, 2006
Click to expand...
 
How sad that liberals resort to this fascist like behavior. She says something a bit sarcastic and libtards go after her livelihood. Truly fascist behavior.

The only thing I am saddened by is that Cruz’s bullets missed Hogg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
Stretch said:
Again, we're back to calling him a kid. He wants to be thought of as all grown up and taken seriously. So, if you think he's presenting himself as a mature adult, then treat him as one. When an adult dishes it out, that same adult has to prepare to be served the dish as well.
Otherwise, no one should be taking him seriously. But, some ARE. Soooooo he needs to man up then.
Can't have it both ways.
Click to expand...

This is an easy one, Stretch. It's okay - you can actually say that it's out of bounds to levy a personal attack against him and ridicule the idea that he was rejected by some colleges, and still support the 2nd amendment and advocate keeping the debate more on the level of discussing the actual issue.
 
blackascoal said:
Newsflash .. he's 17 years old. Feel free to call him an adult because it fits the goofy narrative.

At 17, he can have it both ways.

Newsflash .. Laura Ingraham has apologized after losing a 3rd of her sponsors. Do you think she's taking him seriously?
Click to expand...

OK, so you say he's a kid. Then adults should treat him like a kid and teach him some manners and decent language.
He's fine with that bad attitude and trash mouth thinking he's all grown up. But, when he gets smacked down (like what we as adults are supposed to do with obnoxious "kids") all of a sudden HE wants to run and hide behind the guise of BEING a kid. He's a real player.

Even with ANY "kid", they are either well raised and taught how to engage in polite civil conversations with adults or they are not.
Most people his age are not used to one on one conversations with adults. They have been glued to social media and forums where they never have to look a person in the eyes and master the art of conversation and intelligent debate. They think that the way they anonymously speak on tech gadgets is the you're supposed to speak in public with direct eye contact.

So, they get frustrated, lash out, scream obscenities and throw barricades through windows and the like if there is a remote chance that a speaker might have something to say that is different from their views. He's part of that generation.
 
Stretch said:
OK, so you say he's a kid. Then adults should treat him like a kid and teach him some manners and decent language.
He's fine with that bad attitude and trash mouth thinking he's all grown up. But, when he gets smacked down (like what we as adults are supposed to do with obnoxious "kids") all of a sudden HE wants to run and hide behind the guise of BEING a kid. He's a real player.

Even with ANY "kid", they are either well raised and taught how to engage in polite civil conversations with adults or they are not.
Most people his age are not used to one on one conversations with adults. They have been glued to social media and forums where they never have to look a person in the eyes and master the art of conversation and intelligent debate. They think that the way they anonymously speak on tech gadgets is the you're supposed to speak in public with direct eye contact.

So, they get frustrated, lash out, scream obscenities and throw barricades through windows and the like if there is a remote chance that a speaker might have something to say that is different from their views. He's part of that generation.
Click to expand...

I'm sure if the younger generation pays close attention to Trump, they'll learn proper, polite discourse.
 
Stretch said:
He thinks he's an adult when it suits him and a child when it suits him. Either way, he whines.
Click to expand...

I imagine that if you were at your church or favorite store or the park with your family, and someone started gunning down those around you -- you'd "whine" too. But more likely, you'd be happy for thoughts and prayers and hope that it never happened again because god-given gun rights.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
I imagine that if you were at your church or favorite store or the park with your family, and someone started gunning down those around you -- you'd "whine" too. But more likely, you'd be happy for thoughts and prayers and hope that it never happened again because god-given gun rights.
Click to expand...

Wouldn't be whining...I'd be running, crying and hiding.
 
Stretch said:
OK, so you say he's a kid. Then adults should treat him like a kid and teach him some manners and decent language.
He's fine with that bad attitude and trash mouth thinking he's all grown up. But, when he gets smacked down (like what we as adults are supposed to do with obnoxious "kids") all of a sudden HE wants to run and hide behind the guise of BEING a kid. He's a real player.

Even with ANY "kid", they are either well raised and taught how to engage in polite civil conversations with adults or they are not.
Most people his age are not used to one on one conversations with adults. They have been glued to social media and forums where they never have to look a person in the eyes and master the art of conversation and intelligent debate. They think that the way they anonymously speak on tech gadgets is the you're supposed to speak in public with direct eye contact.

So, they get frustrated, lash out, scream obscenities and throw barricades through windows and the like if there is a remote chance that a speaker might have something to say that is different from their views. He's part of that generation.
Click to expand...

:0) You support the biggest blowhard clown in the WH in American history. An immature buffoonish asshole of a man who is hated all over the planet .. and you're defending a crude and vile right-wing pundit who should have taken her own advice to LeBron James and just shut the fuck up before she ran her mouth and chased her sponsors away.

Now that your blowhard chickenshit heroes who attack everybody are getting their asses handed to them, suddenly you're looking for 'class.'

That's funny.
 
Stretch said:
Wouldn't be whining...I'd be running, crying and hiding.
Click to expand...

Which we all know that David and his fellow classmates did. Along with frantic texts to their moms and dads... for some, the very last "I love you" they ever sent.

But a week later -- what would you do then? Would you sit around passively accepting "thoughts and prayers," or would your inner warrior (assuming you have one) arise and go to battle to make sure that no other mom/kids/families ever had to go through what you did?

I'd be David.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top