AR-15 owner destroys his gun after Florida massacre

Yes. This is the type of stuff we’re seeing on the news. After they aired this I almost went and bought an AR myself just so I could make my own video to counter. I’d send it to @RobinMeade. Bet they wouldn’t show it though. :D
 
Last edited:

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk

Good...that evil ass tool needed destroyed.....look who its owner was, an idiot that bestows life upon inanimate objects. Now lets go sue the gun manufacturers because their tool was used in a crime. That could be what happened to General Motors...look how many lives their tools of convenience take each day of the year (and their tools are not even protected under the Bill of Rights). Just say'n. Kill the hell out those inanimate tools.....beat the evil out of them. That'll show'em. :palm:

If he has any more he want's to kill.....I know a good tool assassin. ;)
 
Now lets go sue the gun manufacturers because their tool was used in a crime. That could be what happened to General Motors...look how many lives their tools of convenience take each day of the year (and their tools are not even protected under the Bill of Rights).

Many americans are asking that. Why does congress give the car makers a pass even though their product kills far more americans than guns do?. Shouldn't we at least not let them sell cars that do TWICE THE LEGAL SPEED LIMIT??

We all know why this hypocrisy exists. The car makers are an enormous industry and have the money to buy congress.
 
Many americans are asking that. Why does congress give the car makers a pass even though their product kills far more americans than guns do?. Shouldn't we at least not let them sell cars that do TWICE THE LEGAL SPEED LIMIT??

We all know why this hypocrisy exists. The car makers are an enormous industry and have the money to buy congress.

DWI.gif
 
Many americans are asking that. Why does congress give the car makers a pass even though their product kills far more americans than guns do?. Shouldn't we at least not let them sell cars that do TWICE THE LEGAL SPEED LIMIT??

We all know why this hypocrisy exists. The car makers are an enormous industry and have the money to buy congress.

I don't think they are given a pass. Congress has passed numerous regulations on car safety (and MPG) and there are many lawsuits every year against car makers, tire makers, etc. for deaths and injuries.
 
The Left micro-focuses on the AR-15 to distract from the numerous failures of Fed. and State employees, and medical Professionals.

:palm:
 
Last edited:
Many americans are asking that. Why does congress give the car makers a pass even though their product kills far more americans than guns do?. Shouldn't we at least not let them sell cars that do TWICE THE LEGAL SPEED LIMIT??

We all know why this hypocrisy exists. The car makers are an enormous industry and have the money to buy congress.

^

There it is again, folks. The Forum Idiot tries to invoke the absurd car/gun comparison even though he's had his ass kicked on the topic numerous times.

I realize that's one definition of insanity, but I submit it's a symptom of massive stupidity. Let's toss in willful ignorance and you've got your trifecta!
 
^

There it is again, folks. The Forum Idiot tries to invoke the absurd car/gun comparison even though he's had his ass kicked on the topic numerous times.

I realize that's one definition of insanity, but I submit it's a symptom of massive stupidity. Let's toss in willful ignorance and you've got your trifecta!

He does 55mph in the Fast Lane to stop other people from speeding :palm:
 

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk

I don’t know who is a bigger fucking idiot cunt, the douche who did this or your dumbass for posting it here

Either way, both of you fuckers have shown yourselves to be ignorant about guns

1) His fucking premise was bullshit from the start. What makes him think his gun would be used? If it was properly locked up like all guns should be when not in use, it is a non issue

2) By doing what he did, he did not render that gun inoperable. All I would have to do is insert a magazine and it would shoot just fine

3) And this is the most important part, he likely committed a felony by shortening the barrel of that gun

This was nothing more than a symbolic virtue signaling piece of garbage by someone I suspect is not a believer in the 2nd Amendment and doesn’t understand guns.

Just like you you dumb fuck

Posting shit like this puts you in Deshtard/GayRod territory.

Stick to global warming you limey prick cocksucker
 
^

There it is again, folks. The Forum Idiot tries to invoke the absurd car/gun comparison even though he's had his ass kicked on the topic numerous times.

Aw, c'mon- everybody knows that US FREEDOM is the forum idiot.
 
I don’t know who is a bigger fucking idiot cunt, the douche who did this or your dumbass for posting it here

Either way, both of you fuckers have shown yourselves to be ignorant about guns

1) His fucking premise was bullshit from the start. What makes him think his gun would be used? If it was properly locked up like all guns should be when not in use, it is a non issue

2) By doing what he did, he did not render that gun inoperable. All I would have to do is insert a magazine and it would shoot just fine

3) And this is the most important part, he likely committed a felony by shortening the barrel of that gun

This was nothing more than a symbolic virtue signaling piece of garbage by someone I suspect is not a believer in the 2nd Amendment and doesn’t understand guns.

Just like you you dumb fuck

Posting shit like this puts you in Deshtard/GayRod territory.

Stick to global warming you limey prick cocksucker
Funnily enough cunt is the word which springs to mind when I think about you.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
Everybody has the right to destroy their own possessions but, like NFL supporters etc, destroying things you already bought and paid for affects nothing but your own pocket.
 
Back
Top