are vehicles really necessary to a modern society?

[SmarterthanYou]

According to State law in Texas:

Yes, Officers will enforce that law. You are BS'ing again.

so you foolishly believe that all cops everywhere are robots who will enforce all laws that are on the books, regardless of any other circumstance???? ROFL, please don't be that stupid

 

[Legion]

do we not have a basic right to travel freely?

Might makes right.

 

[In the Night]

I was given a citation for no license in dallas..........the cop didn't show up for the court date.
I was not given a citation for the bedford incident....the cop 'asked' me not to do it again.


actually have never been stopped on my bike. both times were in a cage...........go figure.

The State law of Arizona states:
Driving without a valid license is considered a Class 1 Misdemeanor. In Arizona, a Class 1 Misdemeanor has a maximum penalty of a $2,500 fine and six months in jail.

You're BS'ing again.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

The State law of Arizona states:
Driving without a valid license is considered a Class 1 Misdemeanor. In Arizona, a Class 1 Misdemeanor has a maximum penalty of a $2,500 fine and six months in jail.

You're BS'ing again.

why are you bringing up arizona?????

are you reaching because you don't want to be wrong?

 

[In the Night]

I know that, but it appears that many people here do not

do we not have a basic right to travel freely?

No.

You do not have the right to travel on private property without the owner's consent. You do not have the right to travel on public property without the owner's consent (which comes from the government representing the people, constructed and defined by it's constitution).

 

[In the Night]

why do you find that hard to believe? is it your contention that mere mortals are incapable of doing 'complex' things like stitching up a wound?

If you want to maim yourself that's your business.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

No.

You do not have the right to travel on private property without the owner's consent. You do not have the right to travel on public property without the owner's consent (which comes from the government representing the people, constructed and defined by it's constitution).

first, you're splitting hairs about the private property shit. secondly, are you seriously trying to state that a person needs the permission of the government to walk on a public sidewalk or the side of a street/highway???????

 

[SmarterthanYou]

If you want to maim yourself that's your business.

you're not answering the question. why do you find it impossible to believe that an average person can stitch a wound????

 

[In the Night]

I used to think that you were capable of long term vision.....apparently not

Bulverism fallacy.

why would i want you to be afraid of me?

Contextomy fallacy.

and why do you think i'm afraid of everyone else?

Because you stated so.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Bulverism fallacy.

Contextomy fallacy.

let me guess, you're going to refuse to answer questions and cite bullshit fallacy theories as a smokescreen of how intelligent you want everyone to believe you are......

Because you stated so.

cite please

 

[domer76]

I see vehicles backed up to the loading docks of my local stores. Unloading massive amounts of goods that people are desperate for. SmarterthanYou wipes his ass with oak leaves.

 

[In the Night]

so you've been a closet liberal calling yourself a libertarian all this time, who knew

Contextomy fallacy.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

I see vehicles backed up to the loading docks of my local stores. Unloading massive amounts of goods that people are desperate for. SmarterthanYou wipes his ass with oak leaves.

 

[In the Night]

first, you're splitting hairs about the private property shit. secondly, are you seriously trying to state that a person needs the permission of the government to walk on a public sidewalk or the side of a street/highway???????

No, I'm not. It is YOU trying to split hairs. Yes. They must walk on a public sidewalk or on the side of the street or highway according to the laws set forth by the government of that jurisdiction. The authority for those laws stem from the constitution of that jurisdiction.

 

[In the Night]

you're not answering the question. why do you find it impossible to believe that an average person can stitch a wound????

If you want to maim yourself that's your business.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

No, I'm not. It is YOU trying to split hairs. Yes. They must walk on a public sidewalk or on the side of the street or highway according to the laws set forth by the government of that jurisdiction. The authority for those laws stem from the constitution of that jurisdiction.

simple question, is there a right to travel freely? yes or no

 

[SmarterthanYou]

If you want to maim yourself that's your business.

so you won't answer the question, got it.

 

[In the Night]

let me guess, you're going to refuse to answer questions

Already did. RQAA.

and cite bullshit fallacy theories

A fallacy is not a theory. Redefinition fallacy.

as a smokescreen of how intelligent you want everyone to believe you are......

Bulverism fallacy.

cite please

If you want to deny what you said, then, stop saying it.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Already did. RQAA.

A fallacy is not a theory. Redefinition fallacy.

Bulverism fallacy.

i'll accept your concession of failure

If you want to deny what you said, then, stop saying it.

prove I said it. show us the words. cite the post showing what you claim. its that or I can throw you on the heap of useless idiots to join domer, legion, and CFM

 

[gfm7175]

you know, one statement that i remember hearing about a drivers license debate was 'shoe leather'.........meaning you have a constitutional right to WALK wherever you want to........what do you think that means?

No. You cannot just walk anywhere you want to.