WTF?Why are people trying to make excuses either way?
have you ever done a police shooting to see if it was righteous
WTF?Why are people trying to make excuses either way?
"I see" said the blind man to the deaf telephone operator thru the disconnected phone lineI am deaf so it means nothing. But thanks for conceding.
WTF?
have you ever done a police shooting to see if it was righteous
no, bye.I am sorry but can you be more clearer?
"I see" said the blind man to the deaf telephone operator thru the disconnected phone line
No rioting, that is.
This is a legit troll.
He must have an X-Ray Vision eyes behind his head,
glad you have a sense of humor. that's severely lacking these days.I've seen better deaf and blind jokes but that'll do.![]()
He disarmed a police officer and then pointed the weapon directly at the officer, if that's not a good shoot then nothing is.
glad you have a sense of humor. that's severely lacking these days.
I sell infomercial junk you see on TV over the phone. it's an inside joke for us operators
Disarmed his taser? That's the same thing as disarming a BB gun.
He disarmed a police officer and then pointed the weapon directly at the officer, if that's not a good shoot then nothing is.
No it's not you literal fucking retard as the taser would have incapacitated the officer allowing the perp to take his service pistol which is likely.as he has already disarmed him of his taser.
Police are authorized to use one level higher of force IE if they use passive resistance police can go hands on, if they use fists police can use tasers and batons, if they use tasers and batons police can use pistols. This was the textbook definition of a good shoot.
What do you think that the cop has to allow himself to get taped and become helpless at the mercy of a violent suspect? Catch bullets communist faggot.
lol. no cluePerhaps you can answer me this one: why are there Braille on drive thru ATMs?
He didn't just take the officer's taser, he allegedly fired said taser at the officer. If this is true, deadly force was completely justified.
Police officers are allowed to use elevated force if the suspect fights with fists they can use tasers if they fight with tasers or clubs they can use deadly force. The suspect could have incapacitated the officer and taken his service weapon as he had already disarmed him of his taser that would seem likely.

This is a textbook good shot, it was an armed suspect that fired on police.
Listen you little fucking moron police don't use proportional force they use the next level of force, if the suspect uses fists they can use tasers and batons, if the suspect uses non-lethal weapons they can use lethal weapons as the non-lethals can incapacitate the officer allowing the perp to take their service pistol which this perp likely would have done as he had already disarmed the officer of his taser. This is a textbook good shoot you communist little faggot.