it depends on how much exposure he thinks he'll get from the press.
Press will say it's all political on part of the SC and help cover up -true
"Barr taps Durham as special counsel, pushing probe into Biden era"
- Thread starter archives
- Start date
Press will say it's all political on part of the SC and help cover up -true
Darth Omar
Russian asset
That’s your theory and you’re sticking to it lol?
Yes, because it’s true.
Darth Omar
Russian asset
Barr is Trump’s stooge except when he’s not?
Barr is Trump’s lackey, I have no idea why he turned on Trump. I think self preservation/interest is some of it.
Darth Omar
Russian asset
Like I said, you’re sticking to your theory lol.
BartenderElite
Verified User
It's definitely self-preservation. Even Barr can see what's happening.
Darth Omar
Russian asset
Two votes for the theory lol.
Certainly is out of the blue, when was the last time a lame duck Administration appointed a Special Council on the way out? Especially one that has already been at it for “around ... for 18 months,” six more and he will top the length of Mueller, and to date has one minor case. And a Special Prosecutor is more than just a change in status
Durham doesn’t have anything, if he did, Barr would have least telegraphed it before the election, the “October surprise,” this is 100% politically motivated,
The “point of insulating him,” easy,” politics, Barr appeases Trump and gives Trump plus the demagogues innuendo material, it is 100% political motivated, motivated by a bitter and vengeful individual
Darth Omar
Russian asset
Think Clinesmith was a man on an island and acting alone when he altered the documents pertaining to the FISA warrant on Page?
He had something against Page and wanted to see him harassed? Or was it at the direction of someone else?
How many times was the report suppose to be released and then it was delayed. I remember three. It’s like you said, they didn’t find anything Horowitz hadn’t already found.
Tranquillus in Exile
New member
And that would show there was a politically-motivated conspiracy to spy on Trump? That was why Barr started this thing - to indulge Trump's fantasies.
I think they'll need quite a lot more than FISA abuses to prove that.
FISA abuses have been happening for a long time. It’s no conspiracy against Trump.
Darth Omar
Russian asset
Makes no sense because Barr is being inconsistent.
Barr could have appeased Trump by hinting at some election dirt and he didn’t. It’s more plausible that Durham hasn’t shown all his cards yet. It’s a different investigation than Mullet’s. No leaks, no pointless lying to investigators charges.
Some of you are a little too sure Durham has nothing. Put it this way: he either has nothing or some shit is going to go down.
rofl. the fact he "turned on Trump" shows he not a lackey..your logic is piss poor awful
OMG.
so now you dismiss using Steele dossier ( when the FBI knew it was fake) for FISAs as no big deal
you do realize how many are involved in preparing and signing off on FISAs?
Ulike Comey Durham is waiting till afetr the election - DoJ policy.
And you ignore the fact Durham now has SC status -why is this now? just because?
In September, Barr discussed the timing of the Durham probe during an interview with Townhall.
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katie...usses-durhams-impact-on-the-election-n2576165
"You need strong evidence of intent, it seems to me, before you can charge that kind of crime so developing that evidence is a time consuming process. Most of the people who are mouthing off about 'well why aren't these people already indicted,' they don't understand the criminal justice process. People get lawyers, sometimes they won't talk to you. Even if they talk to you they'll say they'll take the fifth and you have to get documents and frequently fight over documents and fight over things in court so the investigation is a cumbersome process. It's not something that can be done quickly," Barr said.
"I've said that there are sort of two missions, I see it. One is to get to the bottom of what happened and get the facts out about that and we are going to do that and you know, try to be careful about that, that we don't do anything that would unduly interfere with the election," Barr said. "And then there's the issue of whether someone crossed the line. In the course of these, in my view, unjustified and horrible abuse of power, actually cross the line and committed a federal offense and I can't really say anything about the status of that investigation except that it's continuing and we'll be careful about not bringing indictments in a way that can be viewed as interfering with the [2016] election."
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katie...usses-durhams-impact-on-the-election-n2576165
"You need strong evidence of intent, it seems to me, before you can charge that kind of crime so developing that evidence is a time consuming process. Most of the people who are mouthing off about 'well why aren't these people already indicted,' they don't understand the criminal justice process. People get lawyers, sometimes they won't talk to you. Even if they talk to you they'll say they'll take the fifth and you have to get documents and frequently fight over documents and fight over things in court so the investigation is a cumbersome process. It's not something that can be done quickly," Barr said.
"I've said that there are sort of two missions, I see it. One is to get to the bottom of what happened and get the facts out about that and we are going to do that and you know, try to be careful about that, that we don't do anything that would unduly interfere with the election," Barr said. "And then there's the issue of whether someone crossed the line. In the course of these, in my view, unjustified and horrible abuse of power, actually cross the line and committed a federal offense and I can't really say anything about the status of that investigation except that it's continuing and we'll be careful about not bringing indictments in a way that can be viewed as interfering with the [2016] election."