Biden On Second Amendment

They were allowed to bear arms before that? (I know about the soldiers and others of course).

They were considered property before then..........so, as property, they didn't have rights..........I get that it's Semantics, but the legal ramifications and suppositions are very important in those regards
 
They were considered property before then..........so, as property, they didn't have rights..........I get that it's Semantics, but the legal ramifications and suppositions are very important in those regards

I have stated several times before that the Constitution was made for white men only.
 
I made the claim that they were considered property with no rights. you somehow imagined that this made them free and their rights were being denied...............

Um isn't that what I said?

The black people had no Second Amendment right at that time.
 
you said gun control laws were made to keep blacks from having guns. This was incorrect. Because they were considered property, they had no rights, therefore no gun control laws were needed

Oh now I think I understand. That isn't what I said. I just merely agreed with what Politifact said.

Laws at the time that limited firearm ownership were primarily racist, aimed at controlling Black people and Native Americans.

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/jun/25/joe-biden/joe-biden-gets-history-wrong-second-amendment-limi/
 
can they? no. that does not mean that it's constitutional..........you seem to forget that there's a difference, of course being a liberal, that makes you a dumbass needing government to tell you what you can and cannot do.

if you think you can go buy any arms of war you want, without any conditions, then you are even dumber than I first imagined.
 
"The Second Amendment, from the day it was passed, limited the type of people who could own a gun and what type of weapon you could own.”


As to the cannons? I have no clue where Biden got the notion from.

Actually Scalia, the right's and gun nuts hero on the Court, said the same thing at the end of his Majority Opinion in the Heller case, difference is he used bazooka and not cannon
 
is it a personal thing you are too stupid to understand basic concepts? and it makes you spew stupid shit and not believe the posts and facts of your betters?

it's quite obvious you don't understand basic concepts............you wish you were better, yet I believe the only person you're better than is evince
 
Actually Scalia, the right's and gun nuts hero on the Court, said the same thing at the end of his Majority Opinion in the Heller case, difference is he used bazooka and not cannon

I find it extremely amusing that as much as you idiots on the left hated scalia and celebrated his death, you hang your entire existence on this one single opinion of his ROFL

so typical
 
I find it extremely amusing that as much as you idiots on the left hated scalia and celebrated his death, you hang your entire existence on this one single opinion of his ROFL

so typical

do you ignore the fact fully auto machine guns have been banned from private ownership without special conditions for decades and decades? and scalia was writing along with the majority of how of course society has the right to control what kind of lethal weapons individuals can possess.
 
Anything joke Biden says must be taken with a grain of salt.

giant-grain-of-salt.png
 
Back
Top