Billionaire Tax

I'm all for taxing the rich?!! They contribute nothing to the country, but take everything?!!

Image_richmans_tax.jpg

income-inequality-720.jpg
 
If most Americans want this, why can't we have it?

Because it's illegal?

How can you tax someone for something they actually haven't earned as income?

Example: Some gazillionaire has say $50 million in stock in a company they started. The stock grew in worth from $10 million to where it is now. No different from you and me owing a home and it appreciated in value.
Now, if the government comes and says to that person, you made $40 million and we're taking $20 million in taxes on your earnings even though those are only on paper, they're taxing unearned wealth.
Worse, the gazillionaire decides that taking that hit is too much and unfair. So, he dumps the stock at a loss, say for $10 million causing a panic in the market and the company to crash economically. This results in his declaring a loss on it and no tax paid. Then, in the next tax cycle he buys back the stock for $10 million, recovers the company's position only to do it again in a year to avoid the taxes...

The people who think this law will work are fools. The gazillionaires are not stupid. They got where they are by being smart. They'll figure a way around an onerous tax and fuck the government out of that money to the harm of the economy--but to their benefit.

The Left is full of idiots for thinking otherwise.
 
sometimes the stupidity in people who want to take things from others because they have no chance at acquiring it themselves is mind numbing.........like those of the mindset in the OP.......
 
I'm all for taxing the rich?!! They contribute nothing to the country, but take everything?!!

Image_richmans_tax.jpg

income-inequality-720.jpg

I’m so intrigued by this. So if you start a small business and it does really well you are now bad and have contributed nothing? If you’re a doctor and help save lives and are well compensated for it you’ve now done nothing? If you create a technology that brings services to underserved areas and make a lot of money you’ve contributed nothing to society?
 
I’m so intrigued by this. So if you start a small business and it does really well you are now bad and have contributed nothing? If you’re a doctor and help save lives and are well compensated for it you’ve now done nothing? If you create a technology that brings services to underserved areas and make a lot of money you’ve contributed nothing to society?

the woke plan is to ensure that nobody has any more wealth than anyone else.........or like churchill said about socialism........the equal sharing of misery
 
I'm all for taxing the rich?!! They contribute nothing to the country, but take everything?!!

Image_richmans_tax.jpg

income-inequality-720.jpg


contribute nothing??


How many people do Musk and Bezos employ? Over 1 million?

More than you? How many people do u give a paycheck so they can put food on the table?

Bezo gave a $10 billion gift to help fight climate change. Maybe more than all Americans combined!

What about you?
 
Last edited:
sometimes the stupidity in people who want to take things from others because they have no chance at acquiring it themselves is mind numbing.........like those of the mindset in the OP.......

Well here the Democrats are proposing to tax things people haven't yet earned because they think they can. It'd be like them saying, We calculated your potential lifetime earnings and you owe $10,000 in taxes this year because of what we calculated you will earn... It doesn't make a bit of difference that this year you only earned $10,000. Based on their estimate of your future earnings you get to pay a 100% tax on your income...
 
Hello cawacko,

I’m so intrigued by this. So if you start a small business and it does really well you are now bad and have contributed nothing? If you’re a doctor and help save lives and are well compensated for it you’ve now done nothing? If you create a technology that brings services to underserved areas and make a lot of money you’ve contributed nothing to society?

It would be nice if all those under-served areas did get served. I recently saw that the Bronx has almost no internet.

Capitalism is famous for this. Food deserts.

It wasn't until a Democrat decided we needed to do something that the Tennessee Valley got electricity. And it happened not because of capitalism but because of taxing the rich more and government.
 
Hello cawacko,



It would be nice if all those under-served areas did get served. I recently saw that the Bronx has almost no internet.

Capitalism is famous for this. Food deserts.

Likely 90% of the street people are on the internet, using their phones.

Internet access is a mostly fake problem.
 
Hello cawacko,



It would be nice if all those under-served areas did get served. I recently saw that the Bronx has almost no internet.

Capitalism is famous for this. Food deserts.

It wasn't until a Democrat decided we needed to do something that the Tennessee Valley got electricity. And it happened not because of capitalism but because of taxing the rich more and government.

Did u have internet in 1988? People can live without it


TVA receives no taxpayer funding its a for-profit company.

Sounds like capitalism to me
 
Last edited:
they say there are 700 billionaires......they say they have $4.6T.......Joe and Nancy want to spend $5.6T of it......byebye billionaires.....
 
Hello Flash,

The poll didn't say.

More than they currently pay.

And that view cuts across party lines.

I have seen experiments where question was asked "should the wealthy pay more taxes than they do now?" Most answered in the affirmative. Then, they were asked "what percent of their income should they pay?"

Most answered in the 10-25% range--less than they currently pay.
 
Hello Flash,

I have seen experiments where question was asked "should the wealthy pay more taxes than they do now?" Most answered in the affirmative. Then, they were asked "what percent of their income should they pay?"

Most answered in the 10-25% range--less than they currently pay.

Warren Buffett pays less than his secretary.

That's because most of his income is capital gains.
 
Back
Top